Advertisement

Opinion: Announcing the winners of our Opinion L.A. News Quiz

Share

This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

It was a hard-fought battle, and one of the results just leads us to another question, but we have winners in the limerick and caption portions of our Opinion L.A. news quiz.

Limerick honors go to Seattle’s Gus Hellthaler, who broke out his quill and composed an interesting sprung-rhythm take on the Anthony Pellicano case:

Advertisement

P.I. Pellicano was in the clutchOf Stars, illegal taps, and such.All was revealed in court, for sooth:That you can always telesleuth,You just can’t tell them too much.

Competition was fierce in our caption contest, but L.J. Williamson of Granada Hills takes home the gold with the following:


Medical marijuana cured my glaucoma. God bless America.

Finally, our trivia survey draw a majority of wrong answers, leading to an exciting Family Feud-style final round.

The question: ‘If elected, John McCain would be the nation’s second president to have been a prisoner of war. Who was the first?’

The answers:

George Washington
John Adams
Andrew Jackson

To find out not only which of these answers is correct but, more importantly, which one the survey says is correct, keep reading...

Here are the percentages:

George Washington 55%
John Adams 9%
Andrew Jackson 36%

Many of you agreed with reader Michele Kerr, who wrote, ‘George Washington was a prisoner of war in 1754. I’m pretty sure it was when he was forced to surrender at Fort Necessity, as it was the only time he ever surrendered.’ However, while Michele is correct on the year, the place and the surrender of the fort, Washington himself was never a prisoner. Andrew Jackson is the correct answer.

Washington and his troops were allowed to abandon the fort and march home under the Fort Necessity surrender terms. Here’s the story as recounted in that Cadillac of First-Presidential vehicles, Washington Irving’s biography of George Washington:

Early in the morning of the 3d, while Washington and his men were working on the fort, a sentinel came in wounded and bleeding, having been fired upon. Scouts brought word shortly afterwards that the French were in force, about four miles off. Washington drew up his men on level ground outside of the works, to await their attack. About 11 o’clock there was a firing of musketry from among trees on rising ground, but so distant as to do no harm; suspecting this to be a stratagem designed to draw his men into the woods, he ordered them to keep quiet, and refrain from firing until the foe should show themselves, and draw near. The firing was kept up, but still under cover. He now fell back with his men into the trenches, ordering them to fire whenever they could get sight of an enemy. In this way there was skirmishing throughout the day; the French and Indians advancing as near as the covert of the woods would permit, which in the nearest place was sixty yards, but never into open sight. In the meanwhile the rain fell in torrents; the harassed and jaded troops were half drowned in their trenches, and many of their muskets were rendered unfit for use. About eight at night the French requested a parley. Washington hesitated. It might be a stratagem to gain admittance for a spy into the fort. The request was repeated, with the addition that an officer might be sent to treat with them, under their parole for his safety. Unfortunately the Chevalier de Peyrouney, engineer of the regiment, and the only one who could speak French correctly, was wounded and disabled. Washington had to send, therefore, his ancient swordsman and interpreter, Jacob Van Braam. The captain returned twice with separate terms, in which the garrison was required to surrender; both were rejected. He returned a third time, with written articles of capitulation. They were in French. As no implements for writing were at hand, Van Braam undertook to translate them by word of mouth. A candle was brought, and held close to the paper while he read. The rain fell in torrents; it was difficult to keep the light from being extinguished. The captain rendered the capitulation, article by article, in mongrel English, while Washington and his officers stood listening, endeavoring to disentangle the meaning. One article stipulated that on surrendering the fort they should leave all their military stores, munitions, and artillery in possession of the French. This was objected to, and was readily modified. The main articles, as Washington and his officers understood them, were, that they should be allowed to return to the settlements without molestation from French or Indians. That they should march out of the fort with the honors of war, drums beating and colors flying, and with all their effects and military stores excepting the artillery, which should be destroyed. That they should be allowed to deposit their effects in some secret place, and leave a guard to protect them until they could send horses to bring them away; their horses having been nearly all killed or lost during the action. That they should give their word of honor not to attempt any buildings or improvements on the lands of his most Christian Majesty, for the space of a year. That the prisoners taken in the skirmish of Jumonville should be restored, and until their delivery Captain Van Braam and Captain Stobo should remain with the French as hostages. [Footnote: Horace Walpole, in a flippant notice of this capitulation, says: ‘The French have tied up the hands of an excellent fanfaron, a Major Washington, whom they took and engaged not to serve for one year.’ (Correspondence, vol. iii., p. 73.) Walpole, at this early date, seems to have considered Washington a perfect fire-eater.] The next morning accordingly, Washington and his men marched out of their forlorn fortress with the honors of war, bearing with them their regimental colors, but leaving behind a large flag, too cumbrous to be transported. Scarcely had they begun their march, however, when, in defiance of the terms of capitulation, they were beset by a large body of Indians, allies of the French, who began plundering the baggage, and committing other irregularities. Seeing that the French did not, or could not, prevent them, and that all the baggage which could not be transported on the shoulders of his troops would fall into the hands of these savages, Washington ordered it to be destroyed, as well as the artillery, gunpowder, and other military stores. All this detained him until ten o’clock, when he set out on his melancholy march. He had not proceeded above a mile when two or three of the wounded men were reported to be missing. He immediately detached a few men back in quest of them, and continued on until three miles from Fort Necessity, where he encamped for the night, and was rejoined by the stragglers. In this affair, out of the Virginia regiment, consisting of three hundred and five men, officers included, twelve had been killed, and forty-three wounded. The number killed and wounded in Captain Mackay’s company is not known. The loss of the French and Indians is supposed to have been much greater. In the following days’ march the troops seemed jaded and disheartened; they were encumbered and delayed by the wounded; provisions were scanty, and they had seventy weary miles to accomplish before they could meet with supplies. Washington, however, encouraged them by his own steadfast and cheerful demeanor, and by sharing all their toils and privations; and at length conducted them in safety to Wills’ Creek, where they found ample provisions in the military magazines. Leaving them here to recover their strength, he proceeded with Captain Mackay to Williamsburg, to make his military report to the governor. A copy of the capitulation was subsequently laid before the Virginia House of Burgesses, with explanations. Notwithstanding the unfortunate result of the campaign, the conduct of Washington and his officers was properly appreciated, and they received a vote of thanks for their bravery, and gallant defence of their country. Three hundred pistoles (nearly eleven hundred dollars) also were voted to be distributed among the privates who had been in action.

Advertisement

Thanks to everybody who participated, and to all readers, commenters and other partipants at Opinion L.A.

Advertisement