The Uighurs, a minority Muslim group in China's westernmost province of Xinjiang, are embroiled in a violent protest. So far, 156 protesters on both sides have died and more than 1,000 have been injured.
Coming on the heels of the recent Iran election protests, the events in Xinjiang draw a comparison between the two, particularly in the two groups' efforts to use media and their governments' subsequent technological crackdown.
This protest was provoked by the killing of two Uighurs by a mob of Chinese co-workers in a toy factory, fueled by rumors that the two men sexually harassed Han Chinese women. The fight occurred against a backdrop of heightened tensions, as the Uighurs have been pushed out of their province by a growing population of Han Chinese. Hans once made up only 5 percent of Xinjiang's population -- they now represent 40 percent of the region's populous.
Read on »
In Thursday's editorial pages, the Times focuses on the continuing fallout from this week's controversial election in Iran.
The editorial board comes down hard on the Islamic republic, dismissing its absurd allegations that the United States is behind the current unrest, and blasting the Iranian government for its efforts to squelch coverage.
While it's true that the U.S. may have urged Twitter to keep its global network functioning, or opened its Voice of America site to video and messages from Iran, those were efforts at the margin. The real Iranian fight is internal. Until now, elections in Iran have given legitimacy to the religious government, but this time the vote is widely believed to have been stolen, and that has divided the country's ruling elite along with its citizens. Today's conflict is between factions in the religious elite.
On the Op-Ed page, Judith Lewis gives a shout-out to a sometimes intriguing, often annoying medium that did allow some information to get out: Twitter.
It's important not to get carried away here. There is no revolution being Twitterized, as some have reported, only a possible desire for one. There is certainly no direct line from Twitter to democracy. But Twitter is, by its very nature and architecture, destined to at least democratize information: Google and Yahoo executives can help Chinese authorities censor and rout out opponents with only minor public relations damage. But if Twitter betrays its base of millions, it ceases to exist.
See Lewis' previous op-eds for the Times here.
Also, writing from Iran, UC San Diego professor Babak Rahimi -- who has also studied the role of new media on Iranian politics -- compares this revolution to the one in 1979, which overthrew democracy and established the Islamic republic. This one, he says, is different:
This time, the protesters seek a more democratic state, transparent in structure and accountable only to its citizens.
But we're not only about Iran; we're also thinking about the Uighurs. The editorial board looks at the resettlement of Guantanamo detainees and argues that the best way to get recalcitrant Europeans to open up their countries to Uighers and others who can't be returned to their homes is for the U.S. to set the example:
Obama seemed to make such a commitment in a speech last month in which he reminded nervous members of Congress that hundreds of convicted terrorists are already held in "supermax" prisons from which no one has escaped. The president mustn't waver from that position.
The board also calls for an increase in Community College fees, and columnist Meghan Daum tries to get Barack Obama to light up.
Photo: AP / Getty Images

Post updated at 11:41 a.m.
Well, this proves once and for all that China's got us by the, uh, short sales.
California's Legislature has devoted loads of elaborate calligraphy, high-quality paper stock and legislative floor time to praising everyone from the former head of the prison guards union (the group that keeps on giving -- to politicians), to Japanese Americans interned during World War II, to the Girl Scouts and to the Rose Bowl-winning USC Trojans.
But when it came to a resolution honoring the Dalai Lama, who's usually a slam-dunk for winning hearts and minds in the free world, the Democrats flinched.
I don't think it was because a Republican sponsored the resolution honoring Tibetans' spiritual and temporal leader, on the 50th anniversary of his escape during the Chinese crackdown on Tibet. My excellent colleague Eric Bailey, in his story about this, quoted the resolution's sponsor, San Luis Obispo Republican Assemblyman Sam Blakeslee, as saying that people from the Chinese consulate in San Francisco had worked the halls lobbying against the measure.
Blakeslee had a copy of the letter from the consul general warning that the resolution could damage U.S.-Chinese relations, that Tibet never had been an independent country anyway, and that China had in fact liberated Tibet from "feudal serfdom and theocratic rule."
The Dalai Lama is a figure who has something for both sides: He's a man of peace and he opposes Communist China in Tibet, for starters. President George W. Bush, Sen. (now Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have all praised him.
So what's the Democrats' problem? Why did they cry "uncle" and knuckle under? They did, you know -- they said the matter needed further study, and sent the resolution off to the graveyard of the Rules Committee. How much further study, one wonders -- another 50 years?
Over the last decade or two, the U.S. has mired itself deeper into debt. This is partly because of the laissez-faire regulatory approach that's now got us foundering on the financial rocks, and partly because, as liberal writer Barbara Ehrenreich observed, credit cards (also financed to a big extent by China) are what working Americans were given instead of pay raises. A Harvard economist calculated that between the 1970s and 2004, the average American worker's income fell by 16%. To keep paying the bills, Americans resorted to plastic.
Along with all the other financial follies of the moment, we now see another consequence to being beholden to China: California Democrats in days of yore would have fallen all over themselves to honor so powerful a figure. Now, the richest state in supposedly the most powerful nation in the world is too afraid of the consequences of a piece of paper that could rile a rising superpower. And it punted.
What a sad state.
*Update: Here's the Democrats' explanation for what happened: Bay Area Assemblywoman Fiona Ma said the new administration should be left alone to set its course on international relations with China. A sensible point, and yet the Legislature has, in years past, had no problem passing symbolic legislation about other nations' human rights issues, countries like Ethiopia, Turkey, Laos and Thailand. And last year, the Legislature passed a resolution very similar to the one it "disappeared" into the Rules Committee now.
Credit: AP / Ashwini Bhatia
The Times endorses candidates today for the four contested seats on the Los Angeles Community College District: Angela J. Reddock, Kelly Candaele, Jozef Essavi and Kurt S. Lowry. The editorial board also offers kudos to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for projecting a "nonconfrontational foreign policy" during her Asia tour, her first official trip overseas.
Over on the Op-Ed Page, Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid bemoans the concessions being made in Islamabad toward the Taliban, which is negotiating a deal that might allow the Swat Valley region to impose Islamic law -- a deal that Rashid calls "an unmistakable defeat in the country's losing battle against Islamic extremism."
Also, columnist Jonah Goldberg sees Barack Obama morphing into someone who resembles George W. Bush -- now that he has taken office, Obama is turning out to be a good deal more centrist than liberals or conservatives expected. "It's early yet, but I think we're seeing with Obama what happened with Bush," Goldberg concludes. "The chess master is really just a man who's figuring it out as he goes along. Sometimes he'll be right; other times, horribly wrong. But whether he's right or wrong, left-wing or centrist, liberalism will likely mean whatever Barack Obama says it means."
Finallly, oceanographer William Patzert and water board member Timothy F. Brick point out that higher temperatures are reducing mountain runoff even as other traditional sources of water for Southern California are in severe distress, leading to only one possible outcome: higher water prices and more rationing. That's something Californians are going to have to get used to.
Photo: Residents of Pakistan's Swat valley gathering to listen to an Islamic political party leader.
Credit: EPA / Rashid Iqbal
Columnist Jonah Goldberg gangs up on the Gang of Three today, blasting the "centrist" Republicans led by Sen. Arlen Specter who are approving President Obama's stimulus plan after cutting $100 million from the package. This paragraph pretty much sums up Goldberg's feelings on the matter:
Now, to be honest, I think President Obama's stimulus bill is a monstrosity, a bloated behemoth unleashed on America with staggering dishonesty. The centrist "improvements" are like throwing a new coat of paint on a condemned building.
"The architect" Karl Rove, meanwhile, defends government secrecy and the need for presidential administrations to control media leaks, in excerpts from a speech he delivered last week at Loyola Marymount University. And Nina Hachigian, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, gives Secretary of State Hillary Clinton a checklist of things to discuss with Chinese leaders when she visits Beijing next week: the economy, nuclear proliferation, climate change and pandemic disease.
Over on the Editorial Page, the board bemoans Israel's shift to the right, which is likely to signal a retreat from peacemaking efforts. The increasing hostility and retrenchment by both sides only make peace more elusive and decrease the chances that Israel ever will be secure.
We also take note of Friday's accidental disclosure of the names and badge numbers of hundreds of Los Angeles Police Department officers accused of racial profiling over the last year. The police union has for years been bullying politicians to prevent the release of such information, claiming it would lead to irresponsible actions by the media and put officers' lives in danger -- yet no such problems have emerged. It's time to publicly disclose police misconduct proceedings as a matter of course, not accident. And we argue that cutting back mail service to five days a week instead of six, as the U.S. Postal Service is proposing, wouldn't be such a bad thing if it saves snail mail from extinction.
* Photo of Karl Rove by Gerald Herbert / AP
The Times editorial page celebrates the opening of the latest Fisher guest house for the families of wounded American military men and women, this one next to the Veterans Administration's West Los Angeles medical center. It’s the nation’s 43rd, but the first in L.A. It’s a terrific project, started in 1990 when New York developer Zachary Fisher and his wife decided to build "comfort homes" next to military hospitals to give relatives a free place to stay when family members went in for treatment.
Backed by tens of millions of dollars in private donations and a sprinkling of government funding, the foundation has built Fisher Houses at the major Defense Department medical centers. The main task now is to do the same for VA hospitals, dozens of which have asked for at least one home. The foundation has broken ground on six additional houses and is developing plans for eight or nine more, with a total price tag of nearly $70 million.
Also on the editorial page, the Times looks at the Obama version of the "faith-based initiative" and is not cheered. The new president’s program fails to make a clear statement that faith-based services that accept federal money may not discriminate in hiring on the basis of religion.
The page also calls for bilateral talks with China to reduce that nation’s burgeoning contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
On the Op-Ed side, Marjorie Miller continues her series on Mideast Talking Points, this time talking with Israelis and Palestinians about the state of the conflict and the prospects for peace. In the paper, Miller speaks with Uzi Dayan, retired Israeli major, general and member of the Likud Party; Efraim Halevy, former Israeli Mossad chief and head of the Shasha Center for Strategic Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem; Salam Fayyad, Palestinian Authority prime minister; and Sari Nusseibeh, president of Al Quds University in Jerusalem. Online, she adds Uri Dromi, former spokesman for Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin; Ahmed Yousef, Hamas spokesman in Gaza; and Khalil Shikaki, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research.
And columnist Gregory Rodriguez examines the legacy of mistrust in Africa that persists in the wake of the slave trade, hundreds of years later. He cites work by economists Nathan Nunn and Leonard Wantchekon, who find that slavery still causes people in Africa to mistrust not just outsiders, but each other. So what's the first stage in healing? The media and early childhood education, Wantchekon suggests, could help eradicate mistrustful preconceptions.
Illustration by Anthony Russo, for the Times
 A scene from a 9/11 memorial ceremony today in New York City. (AP Photo/Chris Hondros, Pool)
On the seventh anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Times' editorial board asks a question with no easy answer: Should we consider our conflict with terrorists a war or a police action?
Preventing another attack on the homeland isn't a war, it's a security challenge. It's not so much a question of "winning" this conflict, which will be with us until the Islamic extremism movement fades away, as it is deciding when it ceases to be a so-called war on terror and becomes a fight against terrorism.
Today also happens to be the 35th anniversary of the coup led by Chilean army General Augusto Pinochet, which overthrew the country's elected socialist leader, Salvador Allende. Former dissident Heraldo Muñoz, now Chile's ambassador to the United Nations, offers an even-handed appraisal of Pinochet's legacy as a free-market reformer, as well as the U.S. role in his rise to power: The real economic miracle occurred after Pinochet, between 1990 and 2007, when his reforms were legitimized and improved through democratic debate and consensus. Successive governments also made many of those reforms more palatable with heavy social investment to help those left behind during the Pinochet era. As a result, growth rates almost doubled those of the preceding three decades, and poverty was cut by more than half.
Also in Op-Ed land, scholar Timothy Garton Ash warns of a "new world disorder" that is proving to be more of a global political phenomenon than Islamofascism -- and no less a challenge to the U.S. and other liberal democratic nations. Finally, bringing the focus back to domestic affairs, columnist Rosa Brooks writes about the economic advantages of beauty, real or surgically obtained. (Yes, she does work Sarah Palin into her column. She can't help herself.)
(For a balanced and thought-provoking debate over various Palin-related topics, check out this week's Dust-Up between Reason magazine's Katherine Mangu-Ward and blogger/author Amanda Marcotte.)
Elsewhere on the editorial page, the board calls for a public debate over the schools' role in promoting the arts and other social goods, and it urges L.A. city and county officials to step up preparations for the digital TV transition.
Coming back from a recent visit to Iraq, scholars Shawn
Brimley and Colin Kahl warn that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki is
endangering the recent progress made by cracking down on the U.S.-financed
Sunni forces called the Sons of Iraq:
During our trip, a common theme among U.S. military
commanders, intelligence officers, diplomats and Iraqi political leaders we
spoke with was the growing hubris of Maliki and his closest advisors. Recent
government successes in Basra, Sadr City and Mosul seem to have convinced Maliki's inner
circle that Iraq's army does not need American help as much as it used to. A newly emboldened prime
minister is now moving out aggressively against his adversaries, including the
Sons of Iraq.
Columnist Jonah
Goldberg takes a break from his weekly critiques of Barack Obama's fitness
for the presidency, opining instead on how the choice of Joe Biden reveals the
emptiness of Obama's "new politics." And James Kirchick, an assistant editor of the New Republic, laments how Jonathan Crutchley, the openly gay founder of a dating site for gay men, was hounded by his customers for having donated to John McCain's campaign.
Over on the left-hand page, the editorial board implored the Hollywood studios to resume negotiations with the Screen Actors Guild, and it called on state lawmakers to pass a bill clarifying workers' rights under state law to bring gender-discrimination claims against their employers. Finally, it reflected on the return China earned from its $41 billion investment in the Olympics. For starters, there was a bounty of gold medals. Yet what planners in Beijing miscalculated is that no matter how well
you teach performers to smile, the strain behind the lips is still
detectable. The near-hysterical drive by Chinese leaders to put on the
biggest, most spectacular sporting event ever, and to engineer a
generation of Chinese medalists regardless of the financial or human
costs, is rather more disconcerting to the outside world than
convincing.
Anxious cartoon by Scott Stantis, USA Today.
Tuesday's letter writers sound off on Times coverage of tensions between Russia and Georgia, John Edwards' affair, Sacramento lobbyists and why some people don't love Paris in the summer.
Olympics fan Lisa Bock, of Santa Monica, takes issue with Bill Plaschke's review of the Beijing opening ceremonies, writing: The heat must have gone to Bill Plaschke’s head when he wrote his critique of the Beijing opening ceremony...Plaschke’s statement that "this show lacked real smiles, true laughter, visible heart" did not describe the ceremony I watched.
Maybe he had a bad seat.
*Photo: Michael Czerwonka/EPA
Presidential hopeful John McCain is the star of Monday's Letters to the Editor, as readers react to his plans to promote nuclear power (and to the editorial board's take on them) and to a report about his advisor, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Writes Kim Monson, of San Pedro:
If he gets his economic advice from people like Phil "Americans are whiners" Gramm and Carly "there is no job that is America's God-given right anymore" Fiorina, then corporate elitism will be alive and well in a McCain administration.
USC's outspoken dean of architecture, Saturday shutdowns at the DMV, militant animal rights activists and a busy shrink, too.
*Photo: Mary Altaffer/Associated Press
|
|
What is Opinion L.A.?