Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Is there really 'something' about Gingrich?

Newt Gingrich in Florida

Serves me right, really, for trying to get my news by just scanning headlines.

There it was on The Times' homepage Wednesday: "Pelosi, Gingrich trade shots again."

Wow, I thought: So the two former House speakers have been throwing back Jägermeister?

Maybe Newt Gingrich is a miracle worker. I mean, I know he appeared with Pelosi in a 2008 ad in which they urged action on global warming. But who knew they were drinking buddies?

Uh, no. Turns out Pelosi was asked about Gingrich's presidential prospects in an interview this week with CNN's John King. Her response: 

"He's not going to be president of the United States," Pelosi said. "This is -- that's not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it. It isn't going to happen."

Asked how she could be so sure, Pelosi said: "There's something I know."

Naturally, inquiring minds wanted to know what that "something" was. Including Gingrich:

"Who knows? Who knows?" Gingrich chuckled [when asked about the Democratic leader’s suggestion by NBC’s Ann Curry on Wednesday]. “She lives in a San Francisco environment of very strange fantasies and very strange understandings of reality. I have no idea what’s in Nancy Pelosi’s head. If she knows something, I have a simple challenge: Spit it out; tell us what it is. I have no idea what she’s talking about."

And then Pelosi's office, asked to clarify, pointed reporters to the four-part House ethics report on the former speaker.

Aw, c'mon, congresswoman. You imply there's a "January surprise" or somesuch coming, and that's all you've got?

It's fine for TMZ to tease, but ... 

Seriously, there are plenty of reasons to not vote for Gingrich. But as Jonah Goldberg argued in Tuesday's Opinion pages,  "conventional weapons are useless against Newtzilla …. Everything bad about Gingrich -- the flip-flops, the wives, the ego -- is known. Once voters have convinced themselves they can overlook that stuff, it's hard to change their minds simply by repeating it."

And in a massive upset, I find myself agreeing with Goldberg.

I'm still not convinced that Gingrich will be the nominee, nor do I think he could beat President Obama. But a musty old ethics report certainly won't do him in.

And the 24-hour news cycle that makes stories out of comments like Pelosi's isn't doing us any favors either.

As for me, I'm going back to scanning headlines. Hey, how about that "Headless body in topless bar" update?

ALSO

McManus: Obama's common touch

Newt Gingrich has a real chance to be president

Mitt Romney doesn't want a tax break from Newt Gingrich

-- Paul Whitefield

Photo: Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich at a campaign event with his wife, Callista, in Naples, Fla. Credit: Joe Raedle / Getty Images

 

Comments () | Archives (0)

The comments to this entry are closed.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video


Categories


Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »

Archives
 


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.



In Case You Missed It...