Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

More on Mayor Villaraigosa and the state tax code

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa tells the Sacramento Press Club that the state should consider rolling back Prop 13 and ending corporate taxes 
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa grabbed headlines this week with his call for repealing part of Proposition 13. But his speech was really about a comprehensive overhaul of the state tax code, not just exposing commercial property again to the risk of rapidly escalating assessments. (And does anybody  think property values are going to skyrocket again in our lifetime? Really?)

In Villaraigosa's broader vision, there was much for corporate California to like. Consider this passage from the mayor's speech:

[W]e know that employment tax credits are the most effective way to stimulate private sector job growth in a down economy.  Let's put tax credits for business on the table.

Even further, let's recognize that our corporate tax has become a Swiss cheese of loopholes and exemptions.  Let's put eliminating the corporation tax on the table.

Read that one again: Villaraigosa says the state should consider eliminating corporate franchise and income taxes.

Here's why the idea makes sense. Much of the revenue generated by corporations isn't taxed at the corporate level because it's spent on employees or invested in equipment. But while those expenses are written off at the corporate level, they still get taxed through individual income and sales taxes.

A company's profits, meanwhile, may be subject to taxes twice -- for example, at the corporate level if they're paid to shareholders as dividends, and again at the individual level as dividend income. Corporations may also be taxed twice on the revenue used to pay taxes.

Eliminating corporate taxes would wipe out the double taxation, and it would make California a more attractive place for businesses to locate or expand in. That means more jobs and a more vibrant economy. Granted, the regulatory climate here would remain less inviting than in some other no-income-tax states, such as Texas. But wiping out the corporate tax, whose rates are among the highest in the nation, would certainly help.

Now here's why the idea doesn't make sense. Corporations have at least as much interest as individuals do in many of the services the state provides. Services such as public education, law enforcement and environmental protection are funded in part by sales and property taxes, but also in part by income taxes. Every beneficiary of those services ought to contribute to their costs.

This argument shouldn't stop lawmakers from thinking boldly about corporate tax reform. The goal should be to spur growth, albeit in a way that doesn't bankrupt the state. Given the panoply of other taxes that corporations and their employees pay, it's worth it for Sacramento to consider ending corporate franchise and income taxes as part of an overhaul of the code.


Villaraigosa: Riding Prop. 13 resentment to Sacramento? [Poll]

-- Jon Healey

Credit:  Steve Yeater / Associated Press


Comments () | Archives (0)

The comments to this entry are closed.



In Case You Missed It...



Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.

In Case You Missed It...