Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Four lessons from Japan


If you've missed the Opinion pages this week, here's a roundup of four Op-Eds offering lessons from Japan's devastating tsunami and earthquake. Basically, we need to rethink nuclear energy; prepare for the big one; prepare for a tsunami; or move to part of the country without a nearby fault or an ocean.

Nuclear energy isn't cheap or clean or accident-free

Although it is true that serious accidents at nuclear plants are few and far between, it is also true that the consequences of such accidents are potentially catastrophic. Even for strong advocates of the nuclear industry, therefore, it is foolish to ignore avoidable risks — such as locating a reactor in a seismically active region or, as in the case of Diablo Canyon, assuming that engineering can eliminate any possibility of a seismically induced accident.

Once again, the debate has begun about the role of this uniquely dangerous technology in our global fight against climate change — whether this latest failure in "fail-safe" nuclear reactor safety systems disqualifies nuclear energy from a growing role in cleaning up fossil-fuel pollution as we transition to a clean energy future, a future based on energy efficiency, renewable energy and green jobs. Neither the nuclear industry nor the commission has done enough over the years to inspire public confidence. Nuclear energy isn't cheap or clean or accident-free, and, for the relentless claims to the contrary, the credibility of nuclear utilities and the NRC has taken a beating.

Continue reading »

--Joel R. Reynolds, senior attorney and director of the Southern California program of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

We need to take the warnings from Japan seriously

Despite the catastrophic effects that the quake had on Japan, it could have been far worse. Japan is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world, and it has better building codes and better civic preparedness than just about any other nation. The Japanese take their earthquakes very seriously and do far more drills and inspections than Californians. Yet even some of their earthquake-resistant structures could not survive the shaking of a quake this big, just as their buildings and overpasses failed catastrophically during the 1995 earthquake in Kobe. From all accounts, there were adequate tsunami warnings in most regions, but those people closest to the offshore earthquake had almost no time to react or flee, and there was nothing they could do when the huge waves swept inland carrying big fishing boats and tons of debris.

Continue reading »

--Donald R. Prothero is a professor of geology at Occidental College in Los Angeles and a lecturer in geobiology at Caltech. His latest book is "Catastrophes! Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Tornadoes, and other Earth-Shattering Disasters."

We need to prepare for a potential tsunami

Great strides have been made in the technological and natural science aspects of tsunamis; however, there is still much to be learned from the social sciences about how to motivate people to change their behavior and to prepare for rare but inevitable tsunamis. An effective warning system is not solely technological; it includes efforts of agencies at multiple levels to improve our understanding of tsunami risk, educate officials and the public on what can be done now to prepare, and train individuals to educate others in their communities about tsunami safety.

Continue reading »

--Nathan Wood is a research geographer with the U.S. Geological Survey, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior. He was a member of a recent National Research Council committee to review the nation's tsunami preparedness.

We need to take responsibility for our choices

We may choose to build nuclear power plants, or we may choose a view of today's lapping waves over worries about tomorrow's tsunami, but let's not kid ourselves about who's responsible for our choices and their consequences. Words like "murderous" and "unfriendly" place the blame on nature, when nature is blameless. If blame must be placed, let us appropriately assume it ourselves.

We decided to build towns on the beach and cities on the faults; we created the complex web of power-hungry machines that require ever more energy. After that honest and mindful reckoning, let us stockpile resources and make evacuation plans and fund more disaster response agencies, even as we take a long, hard, soul-searching look at our insistence on hauling out experts to justify bad ideas (e.g., building nuclear power plants near major fault zones) whenever they serve our short-term priorities.

Continue reading »

--Fenton Johnson's most recent book is "Keeping Faith: A Skeptic's Journey Among Christian and Buddhist Monks."


Nuclear power: The end, or a new beginning?

Evaluating the risk of nuclear power plants

Economy: The other fallout from Japan

--Alexandra Le Tellier

Photo: A man looks around a devastated area hit by earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Credit: Kim Kyung-hoon / Reuters


Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.


Reynolds' piece convinced me. Nuclear energy is just stupid. We're now at the second nuclear energy disaster. Perhaps, like the nuclear industry says, there are things to learn that will make nuclear energy safer and eliminate the risks that led to what we're seeing now. But so what? Now we're at 25 years since the last disaster. If we improve on what we have now, what will we have? Instead of a sign that reads 25 years since the last inconceivable nuclear disaster, we might be able to go for 35 of 50 years. But even if we do that , what we're seeing today isn't worth the cost of artificially cheap energy so that we can drive SUVs, avoid the high initial costs of solar, and not have the eyesore of windmills. Certainly we humans are smart enough to create a new path for ourselves rather than just letting a grim future unfold without conscious direction.


Add one more - we need to sit back calmly, relax and look at the real situation instead of hyperventialting over blown-out-of-proportion possibilities. As an example, if you hound someone long enough with a question of possibility the answer will always be yes - however remote nearly everything is possible.


And one more thing as someone here said earlier today - more people died in bus accidents in New York last week than at Three-Mile Island.



In Case You Missed It...



Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.

In Case You Missed It...