Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Government: A national Harry & David moment

Harry and David

Debt is bad.

OK, so that's not exactly "E=mc2." It's not even "Eureka!"

Everyone's talking about debt these days.  As a recent Opinion L.A. blog posited, the "we're broke" mantra is sprouting like dandelions in spring.

On Monday, a headline in The Times screamed "Frenzy in Washington grows over nation’s debt." The story detailed efforts by lawmakers to rein in the red ink.  And it included this perceptive paragraph:

Without substantial changes in government policies, debt could reach 90% of gross domestic product by the end of the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office -- a danger zone, experts say.

Thanks, experts. Good to know where the danger zone is. Question: Is 89% of gross domestic product OK?

On Tuesday, The Times' Mark Z. Barabak reported from Aurora, Colo., where he spoke with John Q. Public to get their ideas on cutting spending.

The story cited this helpful exchange with one Ernest Roy:

Roy said he too was glad the House went Republican. "I was hoping they would put a slamming, screaming halt to all this undue spending," said Roy, an independent and 20-year Air Force veteran. "We're spending our country into bankruptcy, and that's not good."

But, he said, lawmakers need to keep their hands off Medicare. At 75, his health is good, but his wife has had problems and without the federal program, "We wouldn't be here. I wouldn't own a home. I wouldn't have anything," he said.

Thanks, Ernie. Sound advice: Cut stuff, just don't cut the stuff I need.

But it's not just public-sector debt. Tuesday's Times highlighted the dangers of corporate debt: "Harry & David files for bankruptcy".

Crippled by debt piled upon it by its Wall Street owners, storied Oregon fruit company Harry & David has filed for bankruptcy protection.

See, I told you debt is bad.  Even if you're just selling pricey pears.

But the Harry & David story isn't just about debt. It has another familiar element of today: greed.  

The family sold the firm to RJR Nabisco in 1986. It changed hands a few more times before being purchased by Wasserstein & Co. in 2004 for $253.9 million.

The firm, founded by the late New York buyout king Bruce Wasserstein, financed the deal by issuing $250 million in bonds — and used some of the proceeds to pay itself back all of the cash it had put up to buy the company.

"All of the Wasserstein original investors got their money out of it and left Medford [Ore.] with a shell of a company with gigantic debt," said Charles Jaeger, a professor at Medford's Southern Oregon University business school. "They handled it in their typical greedy Wall Street way."

Thanks, Charles, for telling it like it is. But it gets worse:

The new management team Wasserstein installed proved controversial. The chief executive during the last year, Steve Heyer, had previously been pushed out as CEO of Starwood Hotels after facing allegations that he had sent inappropriate sexual emails. Harry & David's current marketing chief, Ross Klein, had been accused in a lawsuit by Starwood of stealing corporate documents after he left his job at the company.

Neither of the men relocated to Medford. Their offices in Atlanta and Beverly Hills were paid for by Harry & David, and Heyer was given a $9.4-million pay package, nearly seven times what the previous chief executive had earned.

So, to recap: Debt is bad. And debt + greed = really bad.

It's probably too late to help Harry & David. But as for the country, what would be so tough about this:

--Cut the defense budget by $100 billion. 

--Have well-off retired people contribute more to Social Security and Medicare, or accept lower benefits, or something like that.

--Raise taxes by 5% on people making $500,000 and more.

Common-sense solutions. Many have been suggested by the Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction committee. Americans like them all until, like Ernie (see above), something they need is being cut.

But we need to make some choices, or we could all end up like Harry & David -– broke, and trying to sell fruit.  


Semantics: 'We're broke' -- truth or scare tactic?

Increase immigration for economic growth?

Americans have gone from loving a good deal to loving a good steal

-- Paul Whitefield

Photo: Harry & David will continue sending out its fruit boxes and operating its 70 retail locations as it reorganizes. Above, a store in Rockville, Md. Credit: Jay Mallin / Bloomberg News


Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Mark Dennett

With regard to Harry & David, you are right on. Living in southern Oregon it is tragic to see good, hard-working "main street" people get destroyed by greed. H&D is just one more small company in America that is being attacked daily by investors that simply have no regard for the values of American business.


The "common sense solutions" are just that COMMON SENSE and that is the reason why they will never be adopted. The pendulum has swung so far to the extreme and unless something akin to the solution proposed above is adopted we headed for a world described by Fritz Lang (Metropolis (1927)) if we are not careful. We are bursting at the seams. The middle classes are being pushed downward into the lower classes while the upper classes are pushed further away from the (remaining) middle classes thus creating a greater divide. No one is paying real attention to what is actually going on; not enough people are speaking up to instigate change. Corporate and individual greed is how we arrive at our current designation -- now, we need to consider our communities/nation at large to protect our survival.


Anyone remember the movie, "Other People's Money"?. Unfortunately, real life has imitated reel life.



In Case You Missed It...



Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.

In Case You Missed It...