Carl Paladino's women problem -- there weren't any women
Whoa, whoa, whoa. The press is justifiably full of stories reporting New York Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino's remarks about gay lifestyles -– but it's left to the New York Post to tell me that female reporters and photographers were banned from Paladino’s appearance at a synagogue, where he made some of these remarks?
Religious reasons, the Post reported, barred women from covering the Paladino event at a synagogue in Brooklyn.
So, stop right there. Carl Paladino is apparently cool with the fact that representatives of more than half of the nation's population are excluded from doing their jobs and covering an event featuring one of the two major parties' candidates for governor of the nation's third-most-populous state? Excluded female journalists, the Post reported, had to stay outside on the sidewalk, where they had insult added to injury when someone dumped water on them.
Think this doesn’t matter? Think again. Would Paladino have agreed to appear at an event at which the organizers had said, OK, but no black reporters allowed? No Latino journalists? Had that happened, Paladino would have had an even bigger self-made mess on his hands than he does now.
I couldn't help but think of the National Press Club which, shamefully, represented something less than the "national" press for decades, because it excluded women from membership until ... get ready for it ... 1971.
Even that commie clown Nikita Khrushchev realized that he couldn't brag about equal opportunity for women in the Soviet Union and also practice discrimination abroad; in 1959, female reporters persuaded Khrushchev not to speak at the Press Club unless women were admitted. And so they were -– but only for that event.
Why would Carl Paladino -- who this spring sent out an e-mail of a video of a woman having sex with a horse, a move for which he later apologized -- evidently have no problem giving a speech at an event at a venue that allowed male journalists but excluded female journalists?
The L.A. Times has an update on the damage control in the matter.
-- Patt Morrison
Photo: Carl Paladino, marching in the Columbus Day parade in New York City, where there were no limits on female journalists. Credit: Reuters / Jessica Rinaldi








Very interesting. Thank you for this. I was wondering if he was actually in a synagogue when he made those vile statements about gays. Since he was in a synagogue, why wasn't he wearing a yarmulka? I am not a Jew but I wear one whenever a friend invites me to his temple, out of respect. How did those rabbis allow him in without a head covering but excluded all women? Why did Paladino show such disrespect, even though the Pope himself wears one? This is the kind of society the Tea Party wants.
Posted by: Nick | October 12, 2010 at 09:02 AM
Paladino seems to be one messed up man/child. Homophobic who keeps mistress[es], e-mails porn and excludes girls from meetings. Just the sort of guy we want in office. Right?
I need to see that photo. How in the world does a woman have sex with a horse?
Posted by: Granny195 | October 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM
He's a dangerous idiot. Let's just hope enough people realize it like they did with Palin. These are scary times for sure.
Posted by: Newport | October 12, 2010 at 07:33 PM
This guy is the *%#t. He speaks his mind and does not care about what any sicko might think. We need governor which will stop dancing to everyone beat and do what is best for the New York. It's simple lower property taxes this way companies would stay and not move to other states with great insentives. I don't care what people like or this like it's their choice to do granted by our constotution you will never please everyone.
I will now donate to his campaign that's for sure.
Posted by: Tony K. | October 12, 2010 at 07:54 PM
We get it!
Apparently it's NOT PC ok for Jews to bar women from a synagogue for whatever reason they had, but you PC dopes fall over yourselves to accomodate muslims who subjugate, beat or kill their women on the justification that their whacko sharia law says it's ok behavior. Noooooo!
Rather than question that this decision may not have been in Paladino's control, you PC commie media drones jump to slam everything on this guy simply because he insults your sodomite 'pets'.
When will you media dopes learn that your mechanications to 'adjust' the public mind-set is well beyond transparent.
Posted by: Padre Pete | October 12, 2010 at 08:03 PM
Much to do about nothing. Pat; your bias is showing again. I don't have a problem with you digging into this guy but what I mind is, you had a dirty sheriff to interview and you asked Lee Baca what is favorite crayon was! (Retorical)
Posted by: cooler heads | October 12, 2010 at 08:21 PM
If anything, the Tea Party seems to be filled with people with the worst of human behavior. Lying about college degrees earned, bumming off of the system, crazy demented talk - these candidates run the gamut from crazy to just plain wacko. Paladino is the face of the Republican Party. The Republican Party is voting for these racist narrow minded people.
Posted by: ATL Guy | October 12, 2010 at 08:22 PM
Paladino has apparently no ability to look beyond himself and empathize with others. What a disaster for governor he would make.
Posted by: Dave Wyman | October 12, 2010 at 08:27 PM
This is the worst journalism I have ever read. A synagogue, in Brooklyn no less, is a very religious establishment. I highly doubt that the reporters had water "poured" on them, and if they did, it was unrelated. They were trying to encourage modesty. Women in wet clothes, are even less modest. It just doesn't add up.
I don't follow politics nor do I even know who Paladino is, but he was not showing any ill will towards women, but rather support of those with religious beliefs and their freedom to maintain a holy sanctuary.
And Jews don't bar women from a synagogue. They try to maintain a modest grounds, where men can focus on their thoughts between themselves and their maker. Women are always welcome, often attend, but are not required by Jewish law to attend since they are considered holier and born at a higher spiritual level. The Jewish religious has the utmost respect for the women that bring life into the world. This is why women also don't wear a head covering- which is not required to enter a synagogue, man, woman, pope, whomever (as a note to those commenting.)
This is one of the most religious neighborhoods outside of Israel. Let the man show some respect, and the reporters themselves should as well. Additionally I must say, as a woman myself, we are not a class that is discriminated against any more. The latest generation of graduates are out earning their male counterparts. And women reporters? If anything its about time it was an advantage to be a man in an industry where big breasts, big hair, and a girlish smile makes you camera and thus news reporter worthy. According to The Boston Globe in March 2009 57% of news anchors nationally were women. Lets cry for those that are truly suffering in the world.
I actually find your article to be a perfect representation of your own ignorance, as well as that of your readers. It is also borderline anti-semitic.
Posted by: Stephanie Chait | October 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM
This man is apparently into throwing stones at others when he needs to direct them at himself.
Paladino sells hate and fear. He is a thug! He is bully! He is vile!
Who will he go after next Puerto Ricans, other Latins, Blacks, Jews, single mothers, teachers older than him, teachers younger than him, people with brown hair, people with blue eyes, Asians, the disabled, children with special needs, the blind. Where does it stop with him? He is not to be trusted ever!
Posted by: Rosemary | October 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Duh, Don't you ever watch TV? This was news yesterday. And those chuckleheads in the background... creepiest thing I've ever seen.
Posted by: Ned Flanders | October 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Mr. Chait, you just don't get it. Very simply it is wrong here, there and everywhere. " When one of us is chained, none of us are free" Soloman Burke . And why should we be controlled by some religious fanatic? Tax all Religions!! Booga, Boog, Booga follow me! I know the TRUTH! Yea right!
Posted by: WinManCan | October 12, 2010 at 10:27 PM
Stephanie Chait, Orthodox Jews separate men from women when praying. Ultra Orthodox Jews don't let women have anything to do with this kind of thing, and only let them pray far away from men. They aren't anything like the rest of us.
The cure for this problem, if anyone thought about this, was for Paladino's people to ask the President of this congregation if this could be held outside the Synagogue, so that the public could hear and cover it. They probably would have been gracious about it.
Posted by: MissMarple | October 12, 2010 at 10:46 PM
Hey, everybody, guess what? Paladino's going to lose. He's behind by over 12 percent in the latest Rasmussen poll. To read these articles you would think it was a neck-and-neck race.
I sometimes wonder if Democrats are focusing on an election that they are certain to win so that they can ignore the others and continue to think happy thoughts.
Well, whatever, guys. New York's hopelessly blue--so, let's all just yawn, pull the lever marked "D" and go back to sleep.
Posted by: Greg Maragos | October 12, 2010 at 10:53 PM
"Who will he go after next Puerto Ricans, other Latins,"
I've always wondered how it came to be that guys with names like Cuomo, Paladino, DiMagio, aren't considered 'Latin' or 'Latino' . Aren't they the original 'Latinos'.
Posted by: Mitchell Young | October 12, 2010 at 10:54 PM
lol. How about so equal time for Andrew Cuomo?
Or is everyone just comfortable with the fact that he's a Cuomo-Kennedy Dynasty politician, the single big government bureaucrat as Secretary of HUD and Director of Freddie Mac and Fannie May, responsible for the credit policies instituted by banks for the sub-prime mess and the melt down of our economy?
Given all that, I'd vote for Paladino if he was Hitler re-incarnate.
Posted by: Pasquino Marforio | October 13, 2010 at 03:56 AM
MissMarple:
There are extremists in every religion, social group, and belief system. I haven't heard of any Jews who make the women pray from "far away" (some are on a balcony above), but I can imagine it is possible in certain areas of Jerusalem. Reform and conservative synagogues have men and women praying together. Orthodox seperate the men and women by a divider, which lets each gender focus on their prayers, and pray while less inhibited. They manage to take note of something not so shocking: straight men, by nature, have a physical attraction to women, and sometimes, it is distracting.
I like your comment though, it would have been a much better idea to hold it outside the synagogue. If he wanted to show support to the Jewish community, a community center would have sufficed.
Posted by: Stephanie Chait | October 13, 2010 at 09:57 AM
I nominate Stephanie Chait for "Hot Jewish Princess of the Year". Very good, accurate, educational and to the point. A girl with smarts is ALWAYS to be appreciated.
BTW Mr. WinManCAN'T (reading comprehension) that's a STEPHANIE NOT a "Mr."
Maybe this is a small example as to why most people blogging the Times post contorted responses to stories, they fail to comprehend the world around them.
Posted by: Padre Pete | October 13, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Thank you Padre Pete. That is my third year nominated. Never a winner though, thanks to Natalie Portman and Bar Rafaeli. I feel this year will be my year.
Posted by: Stephanie Chait | October 14, 2010 at 01:43 AM
Gang, Paladino is now hereby off topic!
Stephanie Chait, Natilie Portman is jewish? OK, then what about Bar Rafalei... you look as good as THAT?
We need pics girl, we need the pics if you're looking that good. Then maybe this page group can petition the Times to actually hold a legit vote! :-)
This could be your year...
Posted by: Padre Pete | October 14, 2010 at 02:00 PM
Carl fit right in with those religious extremists.
Religion: The last safe bastion for misogynists everywhere. And they're tax exempt for it, too.
Posted by: NY girl | October 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM