Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Psychiatrists, 'sissies' and the schoolyard

With no input from Sarah Palin (as far as we know), the American Psychiatric Assn., in its new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, has replaced the term "mental retardation" with "intellectual disability." Whether this will stop schoolyard taunts of “retard” is another matter.

Speaking of schoolyard taunts, the draft manual employs new terminology for another condition that gives rise to childhood teasing. What used to be called childhood “gender identity disorder” is now also referred to as “gender incongruence.” The definition of this syndrome is “a marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender." Indicators include “a strong preference for the toys, games, or activities typical of the other gender.” In popular parlance, a boy who prefers fashion to football is called "sissy," a taunt that's a lot older than "retard."

When doing research on a book about the culture wars (including skirmishes over sexuality), I discovered that childhood Gender Identity Disorder is controversial to the point that some activists want it removed from the manual. One argument is particularly interesting: If the APA has deleted homosexuality from its manual of disorders – which  it did in 1973 – it’s inconsistent to retain childhood GID. Why? Because research suggests that most “feminine” boys grow up to be  gay, not transsexual.

A broad generalization? Obviously (and the fact that most feminine boys grow up to be gay doesn't mean that most gays were feminine boys). But this connection informs a program at a Washington, D.C., children’s hospital that helps parents accept  their “gender-variant” kids. A brochure for the program advises parents that although most of these boys will be gay, many will “grow up to be masculine and conventional in their appearance.” Meanwhile, the program counsels parents to question “traditional assumptions about social gender roles and sexual orientation.” “The more that society and their peers may be critical of [these children],” it says, “the more important it is for them to have the support and acceptance of their families.”
 
The question is whether programs like this – or kinder, gentler medical manuals – will prevent other kids from tormenting outcasts with words like “sissy" or  “retard” -- or "fatso," for that matter. Children, unfortunately, are crueler than either parents or psychiatrists.


--Michael McGough

 

Comments () | Archives (4)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Jon Healey

Did the reclassification change more than just the name? Any effect on how the manual defines these two conditions?

Michael McGough

Jon: There are minor differences in wording in the explanations of the two conditions. To compare, click on DSM-4.

Jon Healey

Thanks, Mike!



Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video


Categories


Recent Posts
Ballot comepuppance for Judge Lynn Olson? |  February 14, 2012, 12:06 pm »
Valentine's Day: When love hurts |  February 14, 2012, 11:22 am »
Whitney Houston and the paradoxes of celebrity |  February 14, 2012, 6:30 am »
Valentine's Day: Symbiotic love connection |  February 14, 2012, 5:30 am »

Archives
 


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.



In Case You Missed It...