They're everywhere
LONDON -- Like most Anglophiles, I feel cheated when I cross the pond and find myself listening to American accents or walking past Burger King and McDonald's in search of a British pub, only to find the bar cluttered with Rolling Rock and Bud taps. What we want is contrast (like Conservative proto-Prime Minister David Cameron embracing the National Health Service, a.k.a. the public option, as he did in a speech today).
Likewise, I relish reading the British papers with their accounts of endless "rows" -- an all-purpose, headline-friendly word that covers everything from mild disagreement to nuclear war -- even though I do keep up with the Times (our Times) online. From my first visit to Britain as a high school student, coming here has been a trans-dimensional experience. As they used to say of Earth-Two, the parallel universe in DC Comics, Britain was a world like our own, but with subtle and interesting differences.
That's less and less true in London with its similarities to other cosmpolitan, multicultural cities like L.A., New York and D.C. But London isn't Britain (or even England) in the way New York isn't the United States. Thus I was chuffed, as they say here, to spend Sunday in the country celebrating (with 90 others) the christening of the son of an old friend. From the Saxon church where the baby was sprinkled by a Central Casting English vicar, we repaired to the manor (no kidding) for a post-baptismal repast.
An Anglophile's dream, but -- Globalization Spoiler Alert -- U.S. politics intruded even in this settiing. I found myself sitting with an American who engaged me in a mostly friendly discussion about whether Obama was really born in the U.S. (and where's that original birth certificate?). The really depressing thing wasn't that a fellow American asked for my view of the Birthers, but that English heads inclined interestedly to hear my answer (which, by the way, was "bunk').
More tea, Vicar? -- and how about that Glenn Beck?
--Michael McGough



prsmith is incorrect:
There is no evidence that The Law of Nations was a standard used by the founding fathers and is never referenced anywhere in the Constitution -- constitutional scholars are firm on this. In fact, there is no legal or constitutional definition of "natural born" anywhere in the American system of government. The standard that is currently in use to determine eligibility is the definition of "Citizen at Birth" and Obama qualifies under two counts: 1) his mother is a citizen and 2) he was born in the USA. You can find the full definition under US Code Title 8, 1401.
Posted by: mariehartsf | November 05, 2009 at 08:17 AM
"I found myself sitting with an American who^^ engaged me in a mostly friendly discussion about whether Obama was really born in the U.S. (and where's that original birth certificate?)"
^^was obviously ignorant of the issues. Barry's birth certificate and where he was or was not born are irrelevant.
Barry's father was a Kenyan national and a British subject - NOT a U.S. citizen. The Law of Nations, a standard used by the founding fathers and referenced in the Constitution, defines a native or natural born citizen as:
"those born in the country, of parents who are citizens."
ParentS who are citizenS. Plural.
Barry is a usurper and a traitor.
Posted by: prsmith | November 03, 2009 at 02:06 PM