Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

MJ's CPR

June 29, 2009 |  3:02 pm

cpr, doctor, jackson, michael jackson, conrad murray I'm not a doctor, and the guy who tried to revive Michael Jackson is. But it's hard to avoid having questions about how Dr. Conrad Murray went about administering CPR to the pop star.

Why did he perform the chest compressions while Jackson was still in bed rather than move him to a firm surface? On a bed, the victim is simply pressed deeper into the mattress. According to reports, Murray tried to overcome this by bracing Jackson's back with one hand, which left the doctor only one hand to do compressions. Usually, the rescuer uses two hands, interlocked, pressing down with the heel of the lower hand. It's hard work to get a compression deep enough.

Murray also, according to his lawyers, performed the technique for 25 minutes or so before having an ambulance called. But according to the CPR classes I've taken, the procedure seldom revives a patient; it's more a technique to keep blood flowing until an ambulance arrives. Rescuers also generally aren't supposed to try to do CPR for such a long period even if an ambulance isn't immediately forthcoming. They're supposed to show someone else how to do it as they do it, and have that person spell them for awhile. It's exhausting to give CPR properly, and studies show that rescuers, without noticing, start to let up on the speed or depth of the compressions after a few minutes.

It's early for anyone to be passing judgment on how things were handled in Jackson's particular situation, but it would be helpful to have some top experts come forward to comment on how people should handle CPR in an emergency. Given the phenomenal interest and concern in this case, doctors and public-health officials have been presented with a teachable moment that might be used to save other lives.

Photo: A July 2006 photo of Dr. Conrad Murray. Credit: AP Photo / Houston Chronicle


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

Am I the only one who noticed how calm the 911 caller was? Wouldn't people normally be much more excited in a situation like that? I agree that chances are, Michael had already passed and they only called 911 to make it look like they tried to save him. I blame Dr. Murray for his passing as I felt he could have saved him, especially if it was true that Michael did have a pulse when they were attempting to do CPR on him. If Dr. Murray were a "true" document, he would have known to put him on a hard surface for CPR, even if he had one hand under him, that is still not enough resistance to perform CPR properly.

2.

You can already see that rumor and innuendo are going to run rampant, and that shameless know-nothings like Karin Klein aren't going to let up on Dr. Murray until they ruin him completely. That's what passes for journalism at the LA Times. Well, except for when the Times just makes things up, like Chuck Philips did.

3.

Doctor Conrad Murray is NOT a board certified cardiologist. Apparently he never took, let alone passed the necessary exams. And his board certification in Internal Medicine expired without renewal on 12/31/08.

Yes, he had training in cardiology. But my bet is that very few cardiologists have ever performed (or maybe even been trained in) CPR.

He was definitely a "family" physician.

4.

It just sounds like this "doctor" already knew that Michael Jackson had "already slipped away" and was only following "procedure". All these "newly alleged" needle marks found on Michael's body only would seem to confirm that. Michael was a junkie, a Jackson family "workhorse" and the MONEY MAKER FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY. And this is the result.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives