Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

In today's pages: DNA tests and LGBT ed

June 19, 2009 |  9:45 am

Dad The editorial board bemoans the U.S. Supreme Court decision that inmates have no right to DNA testing that could exonerate them. Attempts by an accused person to find exculpatory evidence should be considered a basic part of due process. The board agrees with Colombian leaders that they, not the United States, should be the ones to try a man accused of holding 15 hostages including three who worked for military contractors. The board also takes a look at the Alameda Unified School District's new curriculum for teaching elementary school children about tolerance toward gays and lesbians, and concludes that the lessons take too heavy-handed an approach for such young children:

It's high time that schools took anti-bullying measures more seriously. We just never thought that would include requiring fifth-graders to recite the meaning of each letter in LGBT.

In attempting to discourage taunting of gay students, the Alameda Unified School District turned what should be a basic lesson on treating others kindly into a primer on sexual identity. Its new anti-bullying curriculum for kindergartners through fifth-graders will begin in the fall and focus solely on gay and lesbian issues -- as if harassment based on race, religion or failure to wear cool clothes were nonexistent. Parents who might object cannot opt their children out of it.

On the other side of the fold, writer Richard Farrell describes the haunting heights and low points of life with his domineering, sometimes abusive, sometimes intensely loving father. And a UCLA English professor parses the language of Middle East coverage and finds that it favors Israel over the concerns of Palestinians.

Illustration by Polly Becker for The Times

 


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

The Meaning of the Supreme Courts DNA decision …

I guess the Neo-Conservatives have figured out the true new meaning of their so called Originalism ... Convient-al-ism, Opportuity-al-ism, whatever works for us is ok, scr-w the rest of the country ISM.

The Fourteenth Amendment clearly states in part ... "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Oh, I get it now, the word "State" refers to, in this case, the State of Alaska. So the United States can deny this person their right. Good going Supreme Court. The court influenced by Neo-Cons, the court that believes in Originalism, the court that flips and flops!!!


Gordon Potik
Santa Monica ,ca

2.

I guess the Neo-Conservatives have figured out the true new meaning of their so called Originalism ... Convient-al-ism or Opportuity-al-ism. Whatever works for us scr-- the rest of the country.

The Fourteenth Amendment clearly states in part ... "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Oh, I get it now, the word "State" refers to, in this case, the State of Alaska. So the United States can deny this person their right.

How silly of me to think the Supreme Court can't protect my rights anymore!!!

Sincerely
Gordon Potik
Santa Monica, CA

3.

As a gay man, I most certainly do not and cannot support LGBT education in its current form. There most certainly is a place where we have to draw a line, and, in my opinion, any form of sex education (whether it be gay or straight) should not be taught until after elementary school.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Thank thee, bishops |  November 20, 2009, 1:23 pm »
Paying for healthcare reform with a 'botax' |  November 19, 2009, 5:07 pm »
Is a $26,000 UC education still a deal? |  November 18, 2009, 5:51 pm »

Archives