In today's pages: The California budget, the foreclosure wave and the L.A. Marathon
The Times' editorial board goes long today on the shortfall in state revenue, laying out a dozen principles for Sacramento to follow as it closes a $24 billion budget gap. The first and most important, the board says, is to avoid default. And although the board urges lawmakers to avoid cutting health care and human services as much as possible, it nevertheless says that lawmakers must take an axe to some sacred cows. Reflecting the amount of work that must be done quickly, the editorial is heavy on the imperative:
Meanwhile, on the Op-Ed page, journalist and author Peter Schrag blasts a proposed constitutional amendment to give the state legislature formal control over the University of California system. Joel Sappell, a former editor at The Times, writes about the changes that California's wave of foreclosures have brought to his Eagle Rock neighborhood. Journalist and woodworker Greg Goldin offers a tribute to Alan Bohnhoff and Jaime Sanchez, who were slain last month at Bohnhoff Lumber Co. in Vernon. And runner Greer Wylder, who recently finished her seventh L.A. Marathon, calls for a new route along streets that are distinctive, rather than ones that are easy to close:
Other cities have created ambitious courses highlighting their characters and history.... Each of the courses is different, but they all reflect a sense that organizers deliberately chose routes to highlight their cities' most appealing characteristics -- diversity, natural beauty, neighborhood charm, history. None of that is much evident running beside the fast-food outlets and car dealers along South Figueroa.
Finally, in Letters to the Editor, readers of the Times offer their takes on President Obama's speech in Cairo, the anniversary of the China's Tiananmen Square massacre, the vandalism of Channise Davy's home in Duarte and Steve Lopez' column about three dentists' charitable efforts.
Illustration: Sean Kelly / For The Times
-- Jon Healey



All of the cuts to healtcare will put patients problems on the back burner for a while. But when they resurface the problems are going to be more expensive to fix.
A lot more uninsured will be going to the emergency room at a very high price.
Posted by: david wayne osedach | June 08, 2009 at 01:19 PM
The LA Times and its columnists have consistently been the only serious source for the draconian choices the state must make. I'm distressed that the public, even my most educated friends, don't seem to be looking at the whole picture. For me, reductions to health and human services that would eliminate our safety net for a growing number of Californians are unacceptable, and I think we need to face the reality that most tax increases won't pass the legislature. Every Californian should take your interactive budget game and realize the choices we're up against. Then think very seriously about today's tough recommendations.
Posted by: Dee Abrahamse | June 08, 2009 at 11:30 AM