Strip searches by schools? No, it's never OK
The editorial board today called for a narrower approach to strip searches of students at schools, saying that school officials should have a reasonable suspicion that a student is carrying contraband.
Having a reason is always better than not having a reason, I suppose, but I cannot imagine circumstances under which it would be acceptable for school officials to strip-search a student. Our society has of late been all too willing to turn educators into cops--and the educators have been all too willing to go along. Thus we had the recent case of school administrators at Porter Middle School in Granada Hills who are accused of setting up their own little campus drug sting, talking a young boy into buying marijuana from another student. What on earth would give educators reason to think they could do such a thing? The belief that law enforcement is written into the job description.
I'm no apologist for kids who bring drugs on campus, but if there's a situation at school serious enough to call for a strip search, it's serious enough to call the police--and the child's parents. Do parents now have to advise their children not to speak to school authorities when they are hauled into the office, to warn them not to submit to strip searches and to make sure they know to have their parents called before they say a word?
Educators aren't lawyers, they aren't police and they don't know how to do these things properly--nor should they. I would think school officials themselves would never want to be seen as menacing law-enforcement types. Students are supposed to trust them, to talk to them. In the case now before the U.S. Supreme Court, a middle-school girl, Savana Redding, was ordered in 2003 under the supervision of a nurse to strip to her underwear, then stretch the underwear so anything loose would fall out, because another student had accused her of carrying prescription-strength ibuprofen. (The search found none.) School nurses--when they exist at all--are the figures students turn to when they are ill or hurting. We would want children in our society to feel comfortable going to these people when they have been abused or molested or face other serious troubles.
Happily, California bans strip searches by schools. I know of no examples in this state where terrible things happened because of the law, no cases in which a principal or school nurse has said, "If only I'd been able to strip-search the kid, it would have saved everyone." But if anyone has heard of such cases, it would be interesting to know about them.
Photo of Savana Redding by Mark Wilson/Getty Images



yah i rember that happening to my class. They just came in and called random students up by thier names. The funny thing is that none of them would have something wrong they were A & B students reliable too. They called two of my friends, and they searched them in another room. They had to take all thier stuff out of thier backpack. It was weird this girl had a chain and they thought she was suicidal. What? i know . She isnt.
Posted by: Amaya | June 19, 2009 at 10:21 PM
To curmudgeon: Two thoughts on the Lawrence King case. School authorities had no suspicion about anyone carrying weapons to school; they had no reason to suspect it. But even if they had, metal-detecting wands, in use at many schools, take care of finding weapons without forcing students to strip down.
Posted by: Karin Klein | April 27, 2009 at 10:27 PM
" I know of no examples in this state where terrible things happened because of the law..."
How about last year's in-school shooting of Lawrence King by a classmate at E.O. Green Junior High in Ventura County?
Posted by: curmudgeon | April 27, 2009 at 09:46 PM
Addendum
MINORS are NOT OF AGE to give consent to any such action either.
Posted by: Suzanne | April 27, 2009 at 12:14 AM
It's child abuse to subject any minor to an invasion of his or her person or property without a parent or legal guardian present. Parents have lost their legal rights as guardians, protectors of their own children in submission to over-zealous authoritarian school custodians! This is an outrage and the Supreme court should wake up and protect parental rights by setting a zero tolerance of such violation of parental rights.
Posted by: Suzanne | April 27, 2009 at 12:06 AM
4th amendment nothing. A school administrator strip searchs my kid & I will be filing charges for assault, not invasion of privacy.
If something bad enough is going on that they feel the need to go beyond looking in a backpack & locker, I expect to be notified & the police can do the seach-in the presence of myself & my lawyer thank you very much!.
Posted by: therese | April 26, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Jon Napier: How does your school MAKE your son wear snow pants when it is 50 degress? Isnt the point of snow pants for when there is snow?
I 'm confident that the supreme court ill rule in favour of Ms Redding. The Granada school was way outta line. Im also surprised that Ms Redding sued the school district for emotional distress, embarrassments, etc.
I think the campus drug sting is entrapment. It shouldnt be found valid.
Posted by: lilkunta | April 25, 2009 at 04:40 PM
I can't convey with words the outrage that I felt when I first heard this story. I am the father of a 10 year old son in public school. Already I've been dismayed by the lack of common sense shown by administrators and teachers with their "zero tolerance policies," and strict adherance to rules designed so that the teachers do not have to think, such as making my son wear snow pants in December even on a 50 degree day with no snow on the ground. Now to think that in the next few years he will be subjected to random "lockdowns" and lockers searches with no probable cause (this currently takes place in our highschool in a rural area). The strip search possibility put me over the edge. I believe the schools are raising a generation to comply blindly with the assault of basic rights, to be oblivious to the possibility of a police state, and to basically become sheep to the wolf of overpowerful government. Whether the schools have this intent in mind I can't say, but I do believe that passive compliance to the will of government is an idea that would not bother the majority of educators today. As long as they approve of the government in power.
Posted by: Jonathan Napier | April 24, 2009 at 12:32 PM
I used to teach and bristled when administrators said we'll do whatever we need until a parent complains. I took an oath like doctors to do no harm, but too many teachers and administrators believe liberty is just another word until a parent complains.
Posted by: Keith | April 24, 2009 at 05:16 AM
"What on earth would give educators reason to think that they could do such a thing?"
Easy, for the the last 30 years or more, society has dumped onto eductors all the ills of society and asked them to teach kids about sex, condoms, gay marriage, human rights, drugs, drinking, manners and behaviors NOT taught at home. All the while these educators, parents and society have sent conflicting messages on these issues to these kids and avoided the all important message that some things are purely wrong and right.
And we wonder why kids are stripped searched? Or need to be stripped searched?
Posted by: Dave Bell | April 24, 2009 at 02:30 AM