Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

New life for HALO

April 24, 2009 | 12:37 pm

Los Angeles, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, budget cuts, skid row, HALO, Safer Cities Initiative, Streets or Services, homelessness, mental health services, drug treatment You know how they call newspapers the "first draft of history"? Our editorial this morning in defense of the HALO program -- a three-pronged effort to keep homeless, non-violent offenders out of the criminal justice system -- is a pretty good example. By the time it was published, it may already have been moot.

Here's a quick tick-tock. City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo's office was planning to hold a press conference Thursday about an expansion of HALO, which is part of the Safer Cities Initiative in skid row. The program was planning to step up efforts to help homeless people resolve their legal problems without going to court or jail -- in particular, enabling them to discharge citations by performing community service (which could include attending classes or getting counseling). Late Tuesday afternoon, one of the organizers of the event sent an e-mail to others in Delgadillo's camp, noting that the conference had to be canceled because Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's new budget wiped out HALO's funding (along with the rest of the Safer Cities Initiative). She also asked for help alerting those who'd already been invited to attend, including city council members, top brass at the LAPD, business leaders and skid row service providers.

Opposition to the proposed cut built swiftly, and by early Wednesday afternoon we in the Opinion Manufacturing Division had gotten wind of it. By the time I started talking to service providers and business people who were familiar with the program, supporters of HALO were well along in their efforts to persuade the City Council to restore its funding. They planned to make their case to the council Monday, when the Budget and Finance Committee is scheduled to review the public safety portion of the budget, among others. Curious why Villaraigosa had singled out the Safer Cities Initiative, I put in a call to his press office. Press Secretary Matt Szabo said he wasn't aware of the cut, so he tried to round up someone who could respond to my questions. No answer came by deadline, so we went ahead and ran an editorial praising HALO and urging the city not to sacrifice such programs without good reason:

... [T]he budget gap is so wide that city leaders may have little choice but to cut some programs that confer real, cost-effective benefits. But they need not cut just to cut. They must do their best to keep intact the best models for delivering services, spending tax dollars wisely and laying a foundation for better times.

Later that evening, I got an urgent message from Szabo saying that the proposed cut had been "inadvertent," and that Villaraigosa had not intended to shrink the Safer Cities staff. The mayor will seek an amendment to restore the positions. It's still a mystery to me how HALO's money vanished -- Szabo says no one in the mayor's office approved the cut -- but I care less about that than seeing the funding reappear.

Credit: David McNew / Getty Images


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

Anonymous, I suspect most of the folks eligible for the HALO citation program would happily trade their problems for those of your hardworking speeder, even if it meant picking up trash for a day.

2.

What about all of the hard working people who have to pay their hard earned money when they get a traffic ticket? Is it fair that some people get their citations dismissed for simply "talking" to a homeless advocate for a few minutes (what you call "getting counseling")while other people have to pay out hard earned money or do hundreds of hours of real work cleaing up the freeways or other real community service for long hours? Why shouldn't the "homeless" also do real community serivice? Where is the fairness in that?



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives