Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

In Wednesday's Letters

April 29, 2009 | 11:02 am

Tea partiesThe Times received some 25 letters responding to comedian Bill Maher's Op-Ed about Republicans and the Tea Party protests.  We published a few in Wednesday's letters.

Wrote Rod Hallock, of Chino Hills:

Bill Maher makes the same mistakes as other pundits when he writes that he doesn't know what the "tea party" protests were all about and then goes on to imply that it is all about President Obama's race.

I went to the protest in Yorba Linda because I am concerned about the inevitable inflation that will result from spending trillions of dollars we do not have to spend. I am retired, after planning carefully to not need public assistance, and cannot afford a hidden tax increase disguised as inflation. The president and other advocates of irresponsible spending have picked up where the people who used their houses as ATM machines left off. Expect the same results.

Solana Beach's Paul Debban thought Maher could have done a better job arguing his case:

Come on, Bill. You know the "tea parties" were about too-high taxes and too-high government spending. So instead of defending these policies, you chose to write a name-calling rant.

This should be beneath someone who has his own political commentary show. We are laughing at you, not with you.

Linda Winders, of Culver City, loved the piece:

Bill Maher, you are so right. What is bothering Republicans is the plain fact that they lost the last two elections and haven't a clue what to do to clean up their sorry act.

Instead of acting like grown-ups and working together with the new guy, they can do nothing but pout and rant and call Obama silly names. The only "leaders" they have are a bunch of right-wing extremist radio and TV blowhards who don't care about the welfare of this nation and do nothing but incite hatred and prejudice.

Hey, GOP, I've got a flash for you: You were beaten fair and square by Obama, an intelligent, hardworking guy who will get this nation back on its feet, even if you won't lift a hand to help him do it. If you want to get back into power, the smart move would be to work with him so you get some of the credit.

If you want to become completely irrelevant, keep doing what you're doing. The only ones who will pay attention are your base, a group that is shrinking every day.

Letters about swine flu and healthcare for illegal immigrants, prisons and the mentally ill, the death of a pedestrian and the Wall Street bailout, too.

Photo: A protester in Atlanta, April 15.  Credit: John Bazemore/AP.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

So 6 million people allegedly forfeited their voting rights to "protest" freely chosen candidates and are not "insane"? Could have fooled me, especially if they have "read" the Constitution and realize what they did. And if they supposedly have 300 million guns...sounds like their priorities are out of whack! Somehow I think someone's math skills are marginalized; kind of like those who think trees kill and catsup is a vegetable. I doubt 6 million people would focus on hate and not making their country better with their voices.

2.

More than 90 million adults voted in the November elections. 48% of them voted against Obama and the Democrats, while abother 6 million stayed home in 'protest' against the 'lesser of two evils.'  By many accounts, more than 50 million households in America own more than 300 million guns and rifles.   50 million Americans - and their families - Republicans, Democrats and 'other' are not insane right-wing crackpots. They are all quite mainstream, as a matter of fact. Most of them have actually read The Constitution and understood what it means. (Plain Meaning Rule. Legal term. look it up.) In any case, attempting to marginalize fifty million Americans with that many guns and rifles sounds like a dangerous political strategy, to me.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives