In today's pages: Competency tests and programs worth saving
The clean-truck program for the Los Angeles port tries to accomplish too much by mixing the unionization of truck drivers with a worthy environmental agenda, the editorial board complains, saying that the move to eliminate independent truckers is tying up the needed anti-pollution program in court -- where it will probably lose anyway. One city program that shouldn't be lost even in an unthinkably bad budget year is the HALO initiative, which diverts homeless, nonviolent offenders to treatment programs, the board advises. Held together by four staffers, it's one program that not only does good work, but truly saves the public more than it costs.
The board also stands firmly behind California's high-school exit exam after a study found that, among low-performing students, girls and minorities were more likely to flunk the test and thus lose out on a diploma. The answer lies in educating low-performing students so they can pass, the board concludes; they will face other high-stakes tests in life, including increasingly common exams to get jobs and society should not accept that girls and minorities will forever be less able to find well-paid employment.
On the other side of the fold, Bill Maher doesn't get what all the tea-party protests were about, and thinks that Republicans don't get what the concerns of the majority of Americans are about. [Editor's note: If only he'd read the 1,688 comments that Marc Cooper received last week when he wrote a similarly forehead-slapping op-ed.]
Here are the big issues for normal people: the war, the economy, the environment, mending fences with our enemies and allies, and the rule of law.
And here's the list of Republican obsessions since President Obama took office: that his birth certificate is supposedly fake, he uses a teleprompter too much, he bowed to a Saudi guy, Europeans like him, he gives inappropriate gifts, his wife shamelessly flaunts her upper arms, and he shook hands with Hugo Chavez and slipped him the nuclear launch codes.
Do these sound like the concerns of a healthy, vibrant political party?
And a constitutional law professor writes in defense of scrapping the written test for firefighters in New Haven, Conn., after black and Latino firefighters scored lower, cutting them from the ranks of those considered for promotion. A lawsuit challenging the city's decision is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. The problem isn't in testing people for promotion, Kimberly West-Faulcon writes, but in using a bad test to measure the qualities needed for advancement -- especially after the city was advised by testing experts that there were better tests around.
.



It's simple, devise a system to raise the damn rates. Then we can afford to buy and maintain our own equipment. The shippers have the money to pay the true transportation cost but would rather keep the confusion of this broken port system in place as long as the cargo gets moved. You want us to become employees of the trucking companies in order to be able to collective bargain a contract as an owner-operator trucker, fine but don't ask us to give up the right to ownership in America! This program could have been handled in a much different manner through a type of driver hiring hall. There are hundreds of owner-operator truckers across America who are considered employee-lease/operators by the companies & have obtained a union contract to haul their customer products. This whole clean truck plan is not about the enviroment at all but a backdoor plan to force owner-operatos to join the Teamsters by taking away our right to own a small business. Maybe someone should have asked us how this port transportation problem could have been solved instead of claiming to speak on behalf of our interest. The Teamsters have turned thousands of truckers away from wanting to join a union by forcing this on us. The folk that put this together had only one interest, large dues paying union membership no matter what the cost to the workers who actually haul America's freight.
BTW - not every truck that works the port is a diesel smoke spewing piece of junk like those who back this crazy plan would have the public believe.
Posted by: porthauler | April 26, 2009 at 04:51 AM
I worked the port as a trucker after grad school while looking for a professional position. They used to all be company drivers but the shippers leaned on them to leave and become independent owner/operators. They were promised higher incomes this way. In fact, their incomes dropped dramatically. Example, shipping companies pay about $75 for a round trip to Ontario and back. A driver could maybe make two such trips a day. A Bakersfield run pays around $100. This will not pay for the truck and feed a person, much less a family. Hence, their trucks are uniformly old and worn out. No one buys a new truck, the pay won't pay the lease and maintenance, not even close.
The port's drivers were lied to two decades ago by the shippers, and now their lies are coming back to haunt them. I have no sympathy.
Posted by: Cheese Wonton | April 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM