Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

The 9th Circuit Rides to the Rescue of L.A.

January 6, 2009 |  8:53 pm

Wow. Neat.

At last, Los Angeles has a Big Cool Friend at its side for when it has to walk through the nasty, mean playground of billboard politics.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals -- that's the feds we're talking here -- has said that the city did indeed act legally and didn't violate anyone's free speech rights when it passed an outdoor advertising ban seven years ago to try to get a grip on out-of-control billboards.

In the years that this ban was rattling around the courts, the city played virtual roadkill in a lawsuit by advertisers that wound up letting 840 billboards not only stay where they are but go digital. What's digital? Think of 840 huge, vertical pinball machines.

Late last year, the city passed a ban within its earlier ban -- a 90-day moratorium that took effect the day after Christmas. Since then, even more unauthorized billboards, in the form of those building-sized plastic signs, have evidently been hoisted into place. Some ban. Is anybody afraid of City Hall any more?

[There's another lawsuit over these ''supergraphics''; one company actually brags that the signs are so large, they can be seen from space. And that generates exactly what kind of business? I didn't know you could shop online from the space shuttle.]

Now, at least, the city has some borrowed muscle. It can point to the 9th Circuit and say, "I'm with them," every time it goes out now to enforce its own rules and start taking down some of these obnoxious signs, and writing up their owners. [You ARE going to go enforce the rules, aren't you, City Hall?]

I think the city owes something to the locals who have been so vigilant about this. Maybe have a drawing, a feel-good contest giving one lucky Angeleno the right to paint his or her own anti-billboard message across a neighborhood outdoor sign, right before it gets taken down for good.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

The sign companies make big bucks during the time these issues are tied up in court. The question now is, will they be penalized in a manner that amounts to more than a cost of doing business, or will they get to keep their ill-gotten gains and move on to the next conquest?


2.

Finally, the courts seem to be on the side of the people, not commerce. This is great news.

Now let's hope we see a significant reduction in billboards.

Here's a question - now that the Metrolights (Fuel) people lost their battle, are we going to see all of those annoying signs that cropped up like cockroaches in the past couple years come down?

3.

What happened to those Angelyne billboards from the '90's?



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.

Recent Comments
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Tim Bowman
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Frank Cardone
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Tom Bates
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Chief Pontiac
 
RE: Parental notification -- again! | comment by MCITP



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives