Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

How Many 'Xs' in Bailout?

January 7, 2009 |  7:55 pm

I guess you have to give them points for trying. Just don't give them any of my money.

Porn mogul Larry Flynt and a fellow named Joe Francis, who dreamed up those "Girls Gone Wild" videos, are asking Congress for a $5-billion bailout for the porn industry.

Now, I've always read that when times get bad, porn prospers. When times are good, porn prospers. Porn, in sum, is a foolproof economic performer. These two admit that the porn industry isn't exactly facing the perils of Detroit, or even California and its budget, but as they declared in their press release, "Why take chances?"

Just in case anyone's even thinking of taking this seriously, please, Congress, don't put a $20 or any other public money in their thongs. Heck, Francis is scheduled to go on trial in a couple of months in L.A. on felony federal tax-evasion charges. That's the only kind of relationship he should have with the federal government.

But I do think that porn's lobbyists could take their case to Congress, just for the entertainment value. Back in 2001, the California porn industry went to Sacramento to lobby over taxes and Internet privacy.

Nearly two dozen porn performers, strip club operators and others campaigned office by office, handing out fliers showing just how much money their business makes in California; one of them, Nina Hartley, said, "We are a revenue generator, and we'd like a little respect."

It  was a trifle ... what's the word? Awkward. But persuasive. One conservative lawmaker was "dour" when the adult industry group first showed up in his office, but after 20 or 25 minutes, he'd warmed up so much that he invited the head of the Free Speech Coalition to play golf with him.

Imagine if that act went to Capitol Hill. Trying to josh with John Kerry, maybe trying to get a laugh out of Oklahoma's Tom Coburn with a naughty joke.

One exotic performer made a huge splash in D.C. years ago. Democrat Wilbur Mills ran the House Ways and Means Committee in 1974, at least until he ran up against some cops.

They stopped him as he drove a bit woozily around the Tidal Basin at 2 o'clock in the morning, a month before the 1974 election. Drinking and driving, not such a big deal back then. But it didn't stop there. His passenger leaped into the water to get away. Her name: Fannie Fox, a.k.a. the Argentine Firecracker, a top-drawer stripper. Fox changed her stage name to the Tidal Basin Bombshell and wrote a book, "The Stripper and the Congressman."

Mills won reelection a month later -- there's no accounting for some voters' taste -- and then called it quits.

And they call those the good old days.   

 


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

You could debate for a long time if the people who run the poren industry are "a better class of people" than those who run Wall Street. To a great degree that depends on how you feel about the act of sex for money on video. Compare that to the shell games and Ponzi schemes that are being told of from Wall Street and the Nina Hartleys and the Larry Flynts start to look like what they actually are good honest people who work for a living and aren't out to hurt anyone. Funny thing, you can get fired for watching porn at work because it is offensive, but you couldn't get fired for talking up a stock.

Go figure Hustler is doing just fine and GM will be broke by summer 2009.

2.

Why not give money to the porn industry?
Their way more honest about their business dealings and way more profitable then the other a-holes congress has been handing our money to.

3.

Lighten up LA Times. The industry is making this 'request' to point out the absurdity of the banking and auto industry bailouts. IMHO this request was made "tongue in cheek" - or some other orifice? :-)

4.

At least porn producers didn't load their books with bad assets, foist the consequences onto taxpayers, and then send their executives on a luxurious quail-hunting adventure before writing multi-million dollar golden parachutes.

This is what happens when you give away taxpayers' wealth away, with almost no conditions attached: The line at the public trough gets longer. And unlike the auto industry and its fuel-inefficient clunkers, porn producers at least give people what they want and cater to a variety of tastes.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »
Thank thee, bishops |  November 20, 2009, 1:23 pm »

Archives