Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

In today's pages: Catholics, felons, Cubans and Alaskans

October 29, 2008 |  5:52 am

Barack Obama, John McCain, Sarah Palin, Catholics, abortion, voters, Tim Rutten, felons' rights, melamine, China, food safety, Cuba, embargo, science, earmarks, Ted Stevens, corruption The Opinion Manufacturing Division steers well left of center today as it takes on voting rights, the Cuban embargo, food regulation, research earmarks and next week's election, among other topics. On the Op-Ed page, columnist Tim Rutten declares that the GOP has lost its grip on the Catholic vote, largely because Catholics' views on abortion now mirror the average voter's:

National polls have shown for some time that, although Catholics are personally opposed to abortion, they believe it ought to be legal in nearly identical percentages to the rest of America. Moreover, as a survey by Georgetown University's Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate found earlier this year, only 18% of Catholics "strongly" agree with the statement: "In deciding what is morally acceptable, I look to the church teachings and statements by the pope and bishops to form my conscience."

Elsewhere on the Op-Ed page, novelist Susan Straight pens a moving tribute to the recently deceased father of her ex-husband, General Roscoe Conklin Sims Jr. Lawrence M. Krauss, director of an Oregon State University research institute, defends three earmarks for scientific projects that John McCain and Sarah Palin have attacked on the campaign trail. And Anchorage Daily News columnist Michael Carey offers a portrait of his state's embattled "senator for life" and sugar daddy (with Uncle Sugar's money), Ted Stevens.

In the editorial stack, the Times board endorses a bill to let ex-cons vote in federal elections, and urges states to follow suit. It rails against the U.S. embargo against Cuba, whose sanctions "worsen poverty and its attendant ills but only strengthen the Castro regime." And in light of the spreading problem of melamine-tainted Chinese goods, the board calls on the U.S. to hold Chinese food imports for testing before it reaches supermarkets and restaurants.

Photo: Andreas Solaro/AFP/Getty Images


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

Hey Aldo, criticize the editorial and Op-Ed pages as much as you like on this blog, that's what it's here for. But your complaints about the news pages fall on deaf ears if you post them in this space. We have nothing to do with the news side of the LAT, as you probably know. Those folks have their own blogs (Top of the Ticket, which covers the presidential race, has 10x the audience of Opinion L.A.) and their own comment boards. If you honestly want to influence news reporters, go where the news reporters will read your comments. They'll never see your critiques here.

2.

A week before the presidential election the Times leads off the editorial page by tackling the musty old issue of the Cuban embargo, yet the paper has been utterly silent on the biggest election story of the week.

At this point it looks like Obama is poised to win the election. Is this the way the Times intends to cover his administration as well? When an Obama administration crosses legal and ethical lines will the LAT ignore it in the news section and run editorials on the dangers of water chlorination? Maybe the Times will still be racing Democratic Underground for new updates in the Wardrobegate saga a year from now.




Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts

Archives