Moms are rising up thanks to Sarah Palin
Even if she doesn't have any foreign policy experience, John McCain probably thought that at the very least he could count on Sarah Palin to nurture the mothers-who-vote niche. But that's not going so well either. Her
campaign has managed to tick off a group of moms that once was thrilled with her.
MomsRising, which in two short years has amassed a membership of 140,000 citizens and counts 85 affiliated groups nationwide, yesterday tried to hand-deliver a letter signed by thousands of its members to Palin's office in Washington. In its letter, the group says it was dazzled to see a mom on stage at the Republican convention, accepting the nomination for vice president, but that it has some questions for her. MR wants to know where she stands on issues such as healthcare, afterschool programs, paid sick days and equal pay for working women.
The smart thing, of course, would have been for Palin's staff to take the letter and thank the 15 mothers (and one baby) for showing their devotion to their country and interest in the Alaska governor. Instead, Palin's people actually turned them away and told them to drop it in the mail.
Dismayed at the rebuff, MomsRising is rallying its troops. Wending its way across the national mothersphere today is an e-mail alerting its membership, and an Internet petition with the group's questions. Its ultimate destination is Gwen Ifill, the PBS moderator for the debate scheduled for Tuesday between Palin and Delaware Sen. Joe Biden. In her weekly live chat over at the Washington Post today, Ifill says she is open to including questions from the public.
Accepting the letter seems like a no-brainer, but who knows? Maybe the Palin camp didn't realize this group is accustomed to much better treatment: Here's Obama speaking at a MomsRising event, and here's Sen. Hillary Clinton.
Photo: Ron Edmonds/AP



IF U STILL SUPPORT BARACK, READ THIS....
A Message by George Carlin:
The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, wider Freeways, but narrower viewpoints. We spend more, but have less, we buy more, but enjoy less. We have bigger houses and smaller families, more conveniences, but less time. We have more degrees but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgment, more experts, yet more problems, more medicine, but less wellness.
Posted by: jon | October 19, 2008 at 10:39 PM
i believe and stand on the attacks of the catholic bishop against barack...its not only true and factual but to compare the intergity between the two persons the bishop is more credible than him and the bishop stands for the truth for the good of the people...lets not be misled by this barack man...
Posted by: jon | October 19, 2008 at 10:22 PM
this is where the americans should be vigilant and cautious about barack because he is a socialist...period...
Posted by: jon | October 19, 2008 at 10:16 PM
barack must run the homeowners association presidency....
Posted by: jon | October 19, 2008 at 10:06 PM
palin should run the pta meeting but not our country. what a sad joke. I can not beliece that there are actually peo[ple in the u.s.a. who are going to vote for her and mccain. and most of them would consider themselves educated folks. GOD HELP US ALL .
Posted by: kim | October 19, 2008 at 07:37 PM
What a bunch of losers. You set women's rights back 100 years when you turn your back on another woman making good. You are a jealous bunch of do nothings and probably lesbians or man-haters to boot. Have a great time alone in your miserable little dark lonely childless/manless worlds.
Posted by: nancy | October 16, 2008 at 12:07 PM
All those ultra liberal women that don't like Sarah because you want abortions, fine, we want you to have abortions and plenty of them.
Posted by: nancy | October 16, 2008 at 12:04 PM
To Ronk;
You're really confused old boy. 24 past presidents have had law degrees and have been admitted to the Bar. Most recently, as all of our troubles have been mounting up since the depression when FDR (a lawyer) got us back on our feet, our country has been doing worse and worse with non-lawyer presidents. The Reagan years were the worst when we had an actor in the White house. He acted smart. A president MUST know the law, period. Get a clue.
Posted by: Dave | October 15, 2008 at 10:54 PM
So many stupid responses from people who do not know the issues.
The Couric interview was not only EDITED but CUT OFF many of Palin's COMPLETE responses to the questions - they clipped her full answers to DUMB her up! The CBS news chose to abbreviate at their discretion. Ask them...
In addition the President will be McCain. He is so much more qualififed than the Fake NOBAMA-
Oh yeah- who wants someone in the White House with the middle name of Hussein?
Wake up people- Clinton signed in the Deregulations during his Presidency on the current financial crisis! Check your history and be Americans!!!
Obama is a fraud and ask him why we do not have access to his or his wife's personal credentials and why certain questions are not ALLOWED to be asked of himself and family in interviews? Katie Couric can give you the list they presented to her...............
Get a grip!
Posted by: grady | October 13, 2008 at 01:50 PM
And to support their claim that abortion is murder do any of that view demand that a Certificate of Conception be issued when pregnancy is determined and from that point on if anything happens to that person whoever caused the harm would be brought before the courts to answer for their actions...including if a live healthy birth is not also reported in a normal time frame?
Posted by: Valjean1 | October 08, 2008 at 08:23 PM
DUNCAN, you're right, Palin is Brain Dead?
I watched the Palin interview. I was sure Voting Republican Citizens would turn away from McCain/Palin after watching their last few interviews.
But, it scares me that Republican Folks are blind to her inexperience in every issue that pertains to the United States.
Wake Up Folks. This is Important.
Posted by: Nick P. | September 29, 2008 at 04:15 PM
IS SHE BRAIN DEAD?
The second installment of Katie Couric’s interview with Sarah Palin aired last night. The topic was the great wide world. One exchange deserves special study. From the transcript provided by CBS:
COURIC: You’ve cited Alaska’s proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
PALIN: Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and, on our other side, the land-boundary that we have with Canada. It’s funny that a comment like that was kinda made to…I don’t know, you know…reporters.
COURIC: Mocked?
PALIN: Mocked, yeah I guess that’s the word, mocked.
COURIC: Well, explain to me why that enhances your foreign-policy credentials.
PALIN: Well, it certainly does, because our, our next-door neighbors are foreign countries, there in the state that I am the executive of. And there…
COURIC: Have you ever been involved in any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
PALIN: We have trade missions back and forth, we do. It’s very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia. As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where do they go? It’s Alaska. It’s just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right next to, they are right next to our state.
This seems to be a case of incoherence of thought leading to incoherence of syntax. Pronouns wander in search of antecedents like Arctic explorers in a blinding snowstorm. Homophones confuse the transcriber. For example, one of the Governor’s answers could as sensibly, or insensibly, be rendered as
PALIN: Well, it certainly does, because our, our next-door neighbors are foreign countries. They’re in the state that I am the executive of. And they’re…
In the “Putin rears his head” answer, jagged shards of the hasty briefings lately stuffed into Palin’s pretty head clang tinnily against one another. “We send those”—those? those what?—”out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this powerful nation, Russia.” Those what? We send what? My hunch is that this alarming jumble must have something to do with the path that Russian intercontinental missiles would take on their way to the lower Forty-eight and/or the air-defense installations that NORAD maintains in the state Palin is executive of. But who knows? The whole thing reads like something rendered from the Finnish by Google Translate.
For a seventy-two-year-old cancer survivor to have placed this person directly behind himself in line for the Presidency was an act of almost incomprehensible cynicism and irresponsibility. It makes a cruel—what’s the word?—mockery of his slogan. “Country First” indeed.
P.S. In the Seattle Times, Hal Bernton reports that Governor Palin has “balked” at opportunities to visit Russia on any of those “trade missions” she boasted of. Bernton writes:
Opportunities abound for Alaska governors to engage in Russian diplomacy, with the state host to several organizations focusing on Arctic issues. Anchorage is the seat of the Northern Forum, an 18-year-old organization that represents the leaders of regional governments in Russia, as well as Finland, Iceland and Canada, Japan, China and South Korea.
Yet under Palin, the state government—without consultation—reduced its annual financial support to the Northern Forum to $15,000 from $75,000, according to Priscilla Wohl, the group’s executive director. That forced the Forum’s Anchorage office to go without pay for two months.
On the other hand, she has met Henry Kissinger and the president of Afghanistan.
Posted by: DUNCAN | September 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM
If the McCain/Palin team is elected will Palin push for a law that requires a Certificate of Conception when pregnancy is determined...to authenticate and give legal status to her absolutist claim that the fertilized egg is a human being from the moment of conception? And that an investigation be initiated to determine where that missing person is if a live healthy birth does not follow...or why that person is not healthy? Anyone else have a view on this. There can't be two classes of human. We've been there before. The egg is either a human being or not, just as it is fertilized or not.
Posted by: Valjean1 | September 27, 2008 at 07:40 AM
It is an insult to women's intelligence (Republicans and Democrats) to assume that just because Palin happens to be a woman we are going to follow her blindly. Palin is so unprepared to be in the position she is now, and in the position she may, God forbid, be in the future, that is totally scary and absurd.
Also, to be the mother of both a new born son with Down Syndrome and of a pregnant teenager and to accept to run for VicePresident, which means she won't be there taking care of her children, really doesn't put her in my list of role models to follow. I don't share those family values! I have put my career on the side and found ways to work from home to be able to be with my two kids who don't have special needs.
If she was some fantastic leader, who could contribute greatly to the future of this Country with her expertise, wisdom, knowledge and intelligence, it wouldn't be as bad. But instead she has proven to be a joke and an embarrassment. Her recent TV appearances have revealed a very sad reality. She is totally ridiculous! I wish I could laugh, but the reality is too frightening to do so. She is doing so much damage to the campaign of John McCain, it is painful! I was going to vote for McCain, but I am so disappointed by his choice for VP, that I can't vote for him anymore.
Posted by: Mariangela | September 27, 2008 at 07:22 AM
It's a Bush/Quayle redux! Hillarious, but tragic.
Posted by: ohiocitygirl | September 26, 2008 at 06:21 PM
The man that will become the 44th President of the United States is a man that has run the gauntlet through the American political system and has survived in the face of extreme adversity. He has shown courage under fire; has stayed calm through crisis, as a leader should; has suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous lies and slurs by his opponents; and carries the slingshot of David against the Goliath of the good old boy Republican white male bastion. That man is someone I will be proud to have as my president, representing my country to the world. That man will help me to be proud to be an American once again. That man is Barack Obama. Thank you.
Posted by: Sandra S | September 26, 2008 at 03:43 PM
My goodness, have republicans gone DEAF, MUTE, And BLIND.
"Palin is still graciously keeping a cool attitude through the whole thing making these liberals looking even more foolish."--OverRuled | September 26, 2008 at 10:30 AM
McCain and Palin are Foolish. They are serving up Hot Steamy Pile of Lies and Republicans are Just eating it up.
I can't even Believe this. These are the Same Republicans that elected Bush for 2 terms.
Posted by: Nick P. | September 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Liberals have been in panic mode since the time Palin was picked. she is such a successful women and a great role model for women but the biggest problem for the liberals is that she is a republican.
Not only the liberal bias media and hollywood, but also the comedy shows such as Letterman, SNL, Jon Stewart are now in full Palin attack mode.
Another thing that drives liberals crazy: Palin is still graciously keeping a cool attitude through the whole thing making these liberals looking even more foolish.
Posted by: OverRuled | September 26, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Hey Jon who posted Sept 25 at 10:13 pm. You are wrong about O'bama not writing anything for the Harvard Law Review. Find reference to the article here:
http://www.lifenews.com/nat4184.html
And you forgot to mention that he wrote a book.
So many people posting on these places are just full of hot air.
Posted by: Dave | September 26, 2008 at 09:54 AM
So it seems, that Republicans in this discussion have now resorted to just making blatantly stupid remarks.
“she was able to do with the pipeline that no one else was able to get going speaks volumes”-- Posted by: Ivan | September 25, 2008 at 07:05 PM
“The pipeline exists only on paper. The first section has yet to be laid, federal approvals are years away and the pipeline will not be completed for at least a decade. In fact, although it is the centerpiece of Ms. Palin’s relatively brief record as governor, the pipeline might never be built, and under a worst-case scenario, the state could lose up to $500 million it committed to defray regulatory and other costs.”—NY Times, 09/11/2008
In case there are any literate Republican’s out there, and they stumbled across this Discussion.
THERE’S NO PIPELINE.
Posted by: Nick P. | September 26, 2008 at 09:46 AM
I think that everyone needs to remember that both McCain and Obama have been in this race for quite a while now and their lives have already been dissected by the media and the public.
When McCain made his VP choice in Palin it caught just about everyone off guard. Everyone wanted to know the who, why, etc...etc. I think that it is understandable that she is under such criticism.
McCain is in his 70's and, let's face it, has some serious health concerns (not to mention 3 battles with cancer: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24789774/). That is why, in my opinion, Palin should be under much more intense scrutiny then Biden. IF McCain wins...and IF something happens to him...Palin would have to step in as President of the United States.
Is she ready to be President?
-Why are the Republicans blocking the media from her meetings with heads of state (http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/MediaNews/2008/09/23/6851656-ap.html)?
-Why are the Republicans trying to change the rules for the VP debates (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/us/politics/21debate.html?_r=4&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1222441863-kC4J93gHQrVUHHfms/hiFA)?
There are a LOT of hard questions...and I wouldn't want to be running for President with the current issues in this country. So, I give a lot of credit to both sides for, hopefully, all doing their best to find solutions that are the best for this country.
For a video that made me laugh, check out the following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKlzTNTBetU
Obama/Biden '08!
Posted by: LT in OR | September 26, 2008 at 08:18 AM
I know that Sarah Palin is not Hillary Clinton. But that doesn't make her any less a role model for women. And I'm not talking about issues. Hillary is a go-getter. She wanted to be President long before Bill did. That's great. A strong role model of what a lot of personal drive can get you. But I think Sarah's story is more along the lines of most the women I know. We are just going along, trying to do what is best for our family. You join the PTA to help your kids. You end up the head of the PTA, not because you wanted it, but because there is not one man who wants the job. Or the man that is doing the job, is doing a crappy one. You make a difference in the school. People start asking if you will help the city, then the state. Sarah is not the "anti-feminist" because she didn't ask for any of this. She is the "pro-woman" because she stepped up to the plate when no one else would. She is a role model for every single mom out there who's husband bailed on her- the mom who stepped up and played the role of both parents, when no man wanted to be the dad. She is a role model for every woman who doesn't think she can have a role outside the home- you can have both. She is a role model for every woman who just wants to help out- one woman can make a difference. And despite the differences we may have in what ideas Sarah supports, every woman should support Sarah herself.
Posted by: A. J. M. | September 25, 2008 at 10:13 PM
Its time for a change. Obama is the MAN
people dont be afraid of change it might just do us some good!!!!
Posted by: Jay | September 25, 2008 at 09:59 PM
A working mom?
From the sound of it, Palin doesn't work much. She's known for having little interest in the details of government (shades of Bush, in the short attention-span department, and look where that got us). And she was absent so often that legislators started wearing "Where's Sarah?" buttons.
From what I've read, her assistant takes care of the children (what taking care of there is) while Todd is either out ravaging the wild life in his snowmobile, working in the oil fields, or being the unelected co-governor sitting in on important meetings and decisions.
And from what I see, I don't find her a loving mother. In fact, she doesn't seem to have an ounce of warmth in her. Maybe that's why Bristol got pregnant -- so someone would love her.
Little Piper was bewilderedly looking to hold momma's hand on the stage at the convention, reaching up only to quickly tuck her arms back down, seeing that she wasn't even on momma's radar screen.
Mother? I don't think so. Baby-spitting machine? Yeah, that's more like it. Especially if it suits her political goals.
Posted by: Minjjoy | September 25, 2008 at 09:58 PM
Is Sarah Palin going to release her tax returns - everyone else has released them. Time is running out.
Posted by: whynot | September 25, 2008 at 09:53 PM