Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Bankrupt Bankers and billion-dollar bonuses

September 23, 2008 | 11:27 am

Great news! Just when it seems like all the tidings about the economy are terrible -- the  United States financial system is buckling under $700 billion of bad debt, regular people are losing their homes, their jobs and their pensions -- comes reassurance from Wall Street. It turns out that the head honchos at Lehman Brothers, which filed bankruptcy last week, will still be getting their share of the $2.5 billion set aside for staff bonuses.

Barclay's of London, which is buying Lehman Brothers for $1.75 billion, confirmed the news to The Independent. The pool gets divvied up between 10,000 people.

I wonder if that includes the $188 million the company agreed to pay to CEO Richard Fuld a couple of years ago? Maybe not. There seems to be tussle over the $34 million he earned last year. (All told, the Age reported, Lehman's top 5 execs took home $81 million in 2007.)

I know what you're thinking: If the compensation for failure is $2.5 billion, how much is success worth? Oh, wait -- that's not it. You want Barclay's to give those execs a financial haircut! Now, if Lehman had been bailed out by Washington, the bonuses would seem a bit more tenuous. But wait -- a contract is a contract, isn't it? If Lehman employees met the contractural requirements for a bonus, shouldn't they receive it, regardless of the overall company's travails?


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

And why NOT accept the bonuses? Remember what business commerce is all about, to earn a profit.

2.

Hmmm... A "Bonus" is a reward, additional or special compensation for a job well done, outstanding performance, etc. Have they earned "Bonuses"? Do they qualify for "Bonuses"? Why should any "Bonuses" be paid with Borrowed Bailout Taxpayer Money?



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts

Archives