Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Make love, not coal

September 25, 2008 |  3:50 pm

Coal Al Gore would make a rotten camp activities director. His idea of motivating the youth of America is to urge them to get arrested in front of a coal plant.

"If you're a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration," Gore said Wednesday at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York.

To translate that last bit from the original green-ese, Gore is referring to coal-driven power plants without the cutting-edge technology to capture the emissions that would otherwise pour through smokestacks. All that carbon-dioxide could instead be liquified and pumped underground -- in theory, at least. In reality, when Gore says young people should protest plants that don't have carbon capture, he means all new coal plants, because this is a technology that is at least a decade away from practical use.

Generation Y (or have we skipped to Generation Z by now?) is for the most part more concerned with getting their hands on the newest electronic gadgets or getting into the top colleges than with current events, so Gore's call isn't all that likely to be heeded. That's not to say it shouldn't be, because the Miley Cyrus crowd will be paying a monstrous price for global warming long after Al Gore is nothing but atmospheric carbon.

What's particulary worrisome are the huge sums the coal interests are pouring into lobbying and marketing efforts, like the Orwellian "Clean Coal" ad campaign from the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity. This is a trade group of energy producers whose very name is an oxymoron: "Clean coal" is sort of like "safe nuclear fallout." Coal is an astonishingly filthy fossil fuel responsible for the bulk of the global warming problem, not to mention mercury contamination and deadly air pollution. All that coal-industry lobbying money is paying off. The Senate on Tuesday passed an energy bill that promotes automotive fuels made from liquid coal, which burns about twice as dirty as gasoline. If prices for electricity ever rise as sharply as they have for oil, we can expect even worse legislation from Congress.

Man the barricades, boys and girls.

* Photo by Menahem Kahana / AFP/Getty Images


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

Take away their computers, PS2's X-box's and other gadgets for a couple weeks - if they can live without them - they could possibly live without coal.

Brr ~ seasonably chilly here in WV - guess that global warming thing went somewhere else. :-O

2.

Being concerned about this planets debt factor, financial management should consider fliping planets/stars as an alternative (Ps.147:4 KVJ) there is plenty to go around and as far as pollution/pathogen free check JohnEllis.com and using hydrogen cells for transportation...Lots more... Contact;
sat69@live.com

3.

While it is important to respect the opinions of others, it is equally important that those opinions be rooted in fact.

Coal is not only our most affordable and abundant fuel, it is also 70 percent cleaner than it was 30 years ago based on regulated emissions per unit of energy produced. Department of Energy figures show that.

There has not been an emissions-related challenge posed to the coal industry that hasn’t been met. That’s why we’re continually looking for ways to use it more cleanly – including the capture and sequestration of greenhouse gases like CO2.

In fact, there are more than 300 clean coal projects going on in the United States right now, totaling more than $6 billion. Take a look at our clean coal technology map to see for yourself – odds are you’ll find one near you.

As a nation, we cannot ignore coal as a source of energy. (It accounts for almost 50 percent of the electricity generated today.) We cannot be left worrying about how we meet our future energy needs without becoming more reliant on imported forms of energy. We have to invest in our energy future by recognizing that coal is a fuel for America’s future.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.

Recent Comments
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Tim Bowman
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Frank Cardone
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Tom Bates
 
RE: Dream (or nightmare) team | comment by Chief Pontiac
 
RE: Parental notification -- again! | comment by MCITP



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives