Old enough to drink?
August 21, 2008 | 7:33
am
The editorial board takes up the issue of campus binge drinking, urging lawmakers to let colleges and universities explore ways to teach students to drink responsibly. That means moving away from the rigid legal drinking age of 21, a standard that has saved thousands of lives over the past two decades. What do you think?
Have a better idea? Post a comment!



I think that if im old enogh to go to war than im old enogh to Drink.
Posted by: 40 oz killa | December 06, 2008 at 05:46 PM
I THINK THAT THE AGE OF DRINKING SHOULD STAY THE SAME.
OF COURES YOU MIGHT BE WONDERRING WHY??
WELL IN MY OPINION, IS THAT IF YOU LET 18 YEAR OLDS TO DRINK, THEY WILL BE MORE DEATH'S INVOLVE.
MOST OF THE DEATHS ARE BECAUSE OF DRUNK TEENS WHO CAN'T CONTROL THERE DRINKING..
Posted by: MARIA JUAREZ | August 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Great Britian decided to keep the bars open longer so that there wouldn't be the binge drinkers rolling out all at one time, and yes, knifing each other (big weekend pleasure with hoodies in London). This year, after 4 years of chaos, they have decided that it was a bad decision. Young people still came out in gangs, and still got into trouble, but were now able to do it longer into the night.
What happened to enforcing the laws that are there? And what is happening that we allow young people to demand and get rules changed to allow them to drink, use mj, etc. Why are we spoiling the young people who are supposed to be our future. If a person wants to drink, learn to do it correctly, not in excess. Learn not to roll out of a bar drunk; be an adult like you want us to think you are, and say no on that last drink. Regardless of your age, because there ARE 18 yr olds drinking now. Breaking the law, but hey, boys will be boys. 20th century thinking.When will men be men? And when will girls be embarrassed to see photos of themselves drunk, and acting like a 12 yr. old?
Grow up and learn responsibility, not just in drinking, but in driving and in sexual conduct. Life isn't fair, it isn't easy, but it does carry consequences when making bad choices. Don't change the rules to satisfy some idiotic justification; change the thinking at a young age, making nicotine and alcohol just as bad as cocaine and other drugs. Quit glamourising and let youngsters know that life choices are made at young ages, at times.
Lower the age...then what next? Yes, you can go to Iraq or where ever you want, but that doesn't make you a man or someone who can think responsibly...it just means you were available to go. How many parents years ago sent their child to military service to 'help him grow up'. So don't use this as an excuse to get 'plastered' with consent.
Posted by: barbara | August 22, 2008 at 06:50 PM
Old enough to vote, old enough to die, old enough to drink.
Posted by: Kristen | August 22, 2008 at 03:37 PM
i still think you should have to be 21 unless your in the armed forces at which point you have earned the right to drink drinking is not a right its a privilege
Posted by: william | August 22, 2008 at 12:20 PM
if your considered an adult at 18 why not drink?
Posted by: anna | August 22, 2008 at 01:51 AM
18 thats my vote!!!!!! im 19 but i i cant go to srtin places because you have to be 21! like there is this club called peares were i live and all of the best bands go there and i cant because i am not 21!!! i thout i was an adalt i gess not!
Posted by: eugene | August 21, 2008 at 10:59 PM
I am all for lowering the drinking age! It doesn't make sense that a man can be forced to die for his country but he can't drink a cold beer!
Posted by: Ashley | August 21, 2008 at 09:14 PM
Actually, research indicates that if the drinking age were raised to age 24 there would be a profoundly substantial drop in the number of alcoholics among those who consume alcohol. Fact is, alcohol is not a benign or "safe" drug, but is selectively addictive with around 1 out of 10 people who begin alcohol consumption going on to eventually meet the clinical criteria necessary for the diagnosis of active alcoholism. Experimentation with alcohol consumption is like Russian roulette. After you begin drinking, ostensibly socially, you wil eventually find out whether or not you are the unlucky 1 out of 10. People who do not drink before the age of 24 are highly unlikely to begin drinking after that age and therefore never manifest the clinical symptoms of alcoholism. France is always touted as a model for "teaching" youngsters "how to drink safely" via parental influence; however, it's also not widely publicised that France has one of the highest rates of alcoholism in the world. A few years back, France even ran a public service announcement that said something to the effect of "remember: only 1 liter per day! (meaning wine consumption). Legal age should absolutely be raised, not lowered under any circumstances.
Posted by: tv | August 21, 2008 at 05:38 PM
Drinking age should be 18 as most parents are now buying and letting there children drink at home as they think it's OK. Breaking the law but guess it's worth chance to them, and no I do not have any underage children at home but believe age shoul be 18 just like it should have been when I was 18 as would save a lot of sneeking around to do it.
Posted by: Fred | August 21, 2008 at 05:03 PM
people drink partly too look cool and bad, lower it to 18 and at first you will see a SURGE or drinking but over the years college kids will drink like casual adults. personally i hate the taste of beer and wine so i dont really care. although it woul be GREAT to have a mikes hard lemonade right now.
Posted by: cody | August 21, 2008 at 04:30 PM
i think if you can go to war your old you should be able to go to a bar and get a drink!
Posted by: blake | August 21, 2008 at 03:38 PM
I agree that teen drunk driving is a problem. However, even when I was a teen back in the early 80's, I thought that raising the drinking age was a backwards solution. A much better solution would be to raise the driving age to 18 and reduce the drinking age (with some limits on younger drinkers) to 16. Also, drinking under a parent's supervision should be legal at any age, so parents can teach their kids to drink responsibly.
Posted by: ed | August 21, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Lets see! Canada and Europe have a drinking age that is 18 years of age. I lived in both country's and it seems that social awareness of drinking is taken more seriously then at home in the U.S. You go to Mexico during long Holiday seasons and chances are who ever is making an Jerk out of them selves while drinking are Americans! Lets Get with it America. We Say 18 You can get a Rifle,Inlist,vote. At 16 we can drive ( Teen behind the wheel)? but we can't have an 18 year old drink?
Posted by: MIke | August 21, 2008 at 01:20 PM
I grew up drinking with my parents at meals and special occasions. I am fine, healthy and average height and build. So to those who say that drinking adversely affects the growth of children, I say your research is incomplete. I never felt the need as a teen or young adult to go out and drink only to get drunk. Drinking has never been anything other another assortment of beverages to choose from when selecting what to drink as anyone would choose from soda, juice or whatever. Our country's continued Victorian value system needs to be re-examined.
Posted by: Anthony | August 21, 2008 at 01:00 PM
The 21 drinking age HASN'T been what's saved lives -- increased enforcement and better auto manufacturing standards have. As evidence, look at Canada, which has had the same drop in deaths but didn't change their age laws. They merely upped their enforcement and auto standards just like we did.
Posted by: bb | August 21, 2008 at 01:00 PM
I just come back from europe from a long vacation. In general kids are allowed to drink when 16y old, and even earlier at home under the supervision of parents and family. But kids are not allowed to drive a car until they are 18y old.
And that makes perfectly sense.
America has a big problem with not willing to give more responsability to kid, the same paternalisme you see regarding other drugs.
Let kids learn to deal with it, teach and educate them. Restrictions and prohibitions never made sense, see the history of prohibition and the lost war on drugs. Educating, thats the solution
Posted by: cedieke | August 21, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I am from a small town about 25 miles away from the border of Mexico. Now in Mexico there is no drinking age, especially if you have money. Something that students at my highschool seemed to have figured out at a young age. When students who were 18 would go to Mexico to drink they never really had self control in a place where it was and is legal to drink. Often they would get so drunk they would end up in trouble with the Mexican police or even just angry people down there. Of course as I mentioned earlier, in Mexico if you have money it can solve you from a lot of problems... it can even make the police go away.
Often these teenagers would not only get drunk, but they would participate in prostitution which is also very cheap and available south of the border. Think about it.... for $10 you can have any STD you want. If you are 18 you can be drunk get an STD and never even remember you got it. Now I know that for the most part prostitution is not quite that easy to come by in the U.S.. How ever stupid acts followed by young 18 year olds drinking will almost always happen.
If 18 year olds can not control their drinking in a place such as Mexico where drinking is legal, what makes people think that allowing them to do it here is going to change that? Get real. Change if you want to, but when your teenagers end up in prison or dead from the abuse of alcohol.... don't say people didn't warn you.
Posted by: Andrew | August 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM
At 18 you graduate from school and either head off for college or enter the workforce. You are no longer considered a dependent, but an adult and therefore should be allowed to make decisions on every aspect of your life. The drinking age should be reduced to 18. At 21 your first legal experience is usually out of control, as it would be at 18. The courts waste too much time on prosecuting 18 year olds.
Posted by: Suzanne | August 21, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Drinking should be legal at 16, when the great majority of people still live with their parents. If you are raised to think drinking is nothing out of the ordinary, something for special occassions or to accompany dinner, the pressure to "take advantage" of your age by binge drinking drops significantly. Kids go to Mexico with their American mentality; kids in France don't act the same way because alcohol isn't forbidden, something to be gorged on.
The age should be 16.
Posted by: Meredith Gallagher | August 21, 2008 at 10:30 AM
if you're old enough to die in Iraq, then you're old enough to drink a beer.
Posted by: jason | August 21, 2008 at 10:28 AM
I think we should follow Europe's lead here. Lower or eliminate the drinking age and raise the driving age.
Posted by: Tim R. | August 21, 2008 at 10:17 AM