In today's pages and tomorrow's: Monica Goodling and Heath Ledger, AIDS and Scrabulous
If you haven't seen The Dark Knight, and you're more than 13 years old, you should go. Right. Now. It's that good. But writer Eric P. Lucas wasn't so impressed with the late Heath Ledger's creepy performance.
It's time to stop the canonization of Heath Ledger. He's not a tragic hero. He's not a beautiful martyr. He's just a pretty good actor who did away with himself and broke the hearts of his family and friends, and he shouldn't get an Academy Award to memorialize his death.
Ouch! Lucas' unsympathetic piece is gonna generate some blowback.
Similarly unsparing, but for different reasons, is the op-ed on indicted Sen. Ted Stevens by Michael Carey, a former editorial page editor of the Anchorage Daily News.
In Washington, he made himself indispensable to the 49th state, and in Anchorage, Fairbanks and Juneau, he was showered with honors and encomiums including "Alaskan of the Century," a title bestowed by one Anchorage civic group. But that was the last century.
Elsewhere on the page, columnist Joel Stein contrasts the impact of the Chino earthquake with the near-hysterical coverage thereof in the news media, which sent seemingly every single person he knows on the East Coast into a tizzy about his safety. Hmm, maybe Joel has written too many people into his will....
The editorial board weighs in on behalf of two fall guys (or rather, a fall girl and a fall guy): Monica Goodling and Exxon Mobil. Goodling, a former Justice Department liaison to the White House, may have helped impose "what amounted to a Republican Party affirmative action program" at the Justice Department, the board writes, but she wasn't its originator. And Exxon, which just posted the highest quarterly profit ever for a U.S. corporation, shouldn't become the "impetus for bad policy," to wit, a windfall profits tax on oil companies. The board also takes several U.S. allies to task for refusing to lend idle helicopters to the United Nations for its foundering peacekeeping mission in Darfur.
Although the U.N. has requested 18 helicopters, not a single member nation has agreed to contribute. That makes it tough to evacuate casualties or respond rapidly to threats, such as the July 8 attack on U.N. forces that left seven peacekeepers dead.... The hall of shame for countries failing to live up to their humanitarian obligations includes India (with 20 available), Ukraine, the Czech Republic, Italy, Romania and Spain; between them, these countries could supply more than 70 helicopters.
Meanwhile, readers register their support for a story and editorial on the successful wetlands restorations at Mono Lake and Bolsa Chica, and the op-ed warning about the city's stressed healthcare system. But they're not so charmed by John Bolton's op-ed about Barack Obama's speech in Berlin. Here's a typical sentiment, from Peter H. Merkl's letter:
Leave it to Bolton to see the world in Manichaean ideological conflicts; if he were still determining our foreign policy, we would be in the middle of World War III.
They also have harsh words for Assemblyman Hector De La Torre's proposal on racially restrictive housing covenants.
In Saturday's pages, farmworker advocates Michael I. Marsh and Dorothy A. Johnson write about the plight of those who toil in sun-drenched California fields. Columnist Tim Rutten bites into the L.A. City Council's moratorium on fast-food restaurants in selected neighborhoods, and columnist Meghan Daum returns from a brief break to remind us that online video sensation "Dancing 2008" isn't all it's cracked up to be.
The Times' editorial board, meanwhile, weighs in on the all-too-familiar battle between the companies that own the rights to Scrabble and the developers of the online knock-off Scrabulous. It also looks south of the border to preview the opening of the 17th International AIDS Conference Sunday in Mexico City, and it backs Mexican President Felipe Calderon's enormously unpopular effort to allow foreign investment in Pemex, the state-owned oil company.
Sunday, look for the board's surprisingly absorbing and instructive explainer about ... municipal bonds. Yes, amazingly enough, it's a fascinating topic.



This Eric P. Lucas has no right to maliciously attack Heath Ledger since he has no idea what he was talking about. No double he is clueless about Heath Ledger and his character. I thought writers were normally knowledgable and compassionate. I guess I was wrong! Shame on Eric P. Lucas!!! How sad and pathetic you are!
Posted by: Tracy | August 03, 2008 at 11:30 PM
I felt a huge sense of anger when I read that comment about Heath Ledger.
As a person who was never EVER fond of him as an actor, and didn't particularly care for him that much I can honestly say that be blew me away with his performance of the Joker. I mean, I was completely skeptical about it, and was horrified when I heard he was cast. Being an actress myself (still a student and no where near the notoriety of huge Hollywood actors) I can appreciate how hard it was to find that character, and just how far you can slip into it if you have to do it for a long period of time or it is a particularly difficult piece.
Now, (BE READY BECAUSE THIS IS THE PART THAT REALLY TICKED ME OFF)
That insensitive, ignorant, unfeeling idiot has absolutely NO idea who that man was or what he was feeling inside anymore then anyone else does. If his family members, friends and Co-workers all vouched for his character that he was not suicidal . . . then he WASN'T. Attacking his character like that with such a callous comment is nothing more then a slap in the face to his family and loved ones. Exspecially his daughter who has to live with this tragic event for the rest of his life.
As someone who has been prescribed these meds let me assure you, if he took ambient . . . it makes you do strange things. You can get out of bed, clean the house, sleep walk even if you never have before, and wake up having no idea what you did during that time. He could have easily retaken the meds thinking he hadn't already just because it was part of his routine.
Also, the doctors are at as much fault here if not more then guilty for this accident. Each and every medication he was prescribed should have been explained in great detail the side effects and what they shouldn't be mixed with. Furthermore, I get the feeling when he went to the doctors he more then likely gave them a list of what he was taking. What the heck was wrong with this doctors? Did they even go to medical school to foul up that big?
My boyfriend and I have been upset about the accident since it happened, and as well everyone else should be. He died when he was only 28, and right before the release of the film his role in would have kicked his career into high gear. Everyone would have wanted him for every film, and he would be in higher demand in Hollywood after "The Dark Knight" then any other actor.
No one, who had so much going for them would intentionally commit suicide. There was no reason. And perhaps the most telling reason of all. He loved his daughter and desperately wanted to see her grow up. He said it in more then one recent interview before the accident.
So I suggest that people like this should do the research and at least have all the facts before opening their mouth and spewing such vile, insensitive, and degrading comments.
~Marian~
Posted by: Marian Welty | August 03, 2008 at 03:15 AM
Is there something wrong with Eric P. Lucas??? His comment on Heath Ledger shows how ridiculously ignorant he is about Heath Ledger and Heath's incredible work for which he gave it all. I thought being observant and having a heart are basic elements for being a writer,let alone writing or commenting on someone he is totally clueless. It is totally unprofessional. How sad and pathetic!
Posted by: Tracy | August 02, 2008 at 03:55 PM
That quote about Heath Ledger is disgusting
Every single person i know who has seen The Dark Knight (and that actually nearly is every person i know) have said his performance was outstanding, and that is not just because he has passed away
He was incredibly talented and did not "do away with himself" the inquest ruled accidental death so leave it at that and do not judge him for things that are not even true!
Posted by: Katie | August 02, 2008 at 07:35 AM
This article is heartless. It implies that Heath took the prescription drugs to get 'high' which I know is not true. Heath suffered from pneumonia, severe back injury and other ailments that are not the public's business. He took those drugs to cope and get better. To make him look like a junkie I consider defamation. It is the misinterpretation of Heath's character by the media that made his life hell when he was alive and he's still being slandered for things that aren't true after his death. It's disgusting!
Posted by: Rosa | August 01, 2008 at 08:34 PM