Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Still waiting for your TXT from Barack Obama?

Barack ObamaJoe BidenJohn McCainmobile phonestext messaging

Barack Obama, John McCain, Joe Biden Ooops. The so-last-century mainstream media beat Barack Obama's campaign to the punch, revealing the name of his running mate hours before the campaign started reporting the choice to supporters via shiny new technology. In case you've forgotten, the campaign had promised to alert its followers first, via text messages and e-mail. But by 10 p.m. last night, the LA Times had confirmed Joe Biden as the Dems' No. 2, as had the NY Times, and I'd be surprised if numerous other papers weren't running with the story, too. (Ditto for the cable news nets.) So as I sit here, still waiting for my copy of the Obama text message (I'm not an Obama backer, I just do the things reporters do), I've got to wonder: will the new-media types who got swept up in the sheer niftiness of the gimmick be a little more skeptical next time? Take, for example, the Huffington Post, which gushed on Aug. 13:

That's right, Obama is announcing his VP via text message — not via leak to a trusted MSM source, not in an editorial in the venerable New York Times, not in a sit-down with a Big Three anchorperson, not even in an eleventh-hour blog post on a wildly popular news-and-opinion site. Instead, he's doing a total end-run around traditional media and breaking some very big news directly to The People.

To her credit, HuffPo scribe Rachel Sklar noted (as the New York Times' Garrett Graff points out in this story) what probably is the real reason behind the text-message gambit: to collect voters' phone numbers. In fact, not long after I signed up, the campaign hit me with an unsolicited text missive that made me regret being such a sucker.

You might also argue that the text-message thing was just a bit of theater designed to make the nation's big media outlets chase the story of Obama's pick more feverishly. But that's silly. It's a presidential race -- the pack couldn't get any hungrier.

 

Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

John

"In fact, not long after I signed up, the campaign hit me with an unsolicited text missive that made me regret being such a sucker.

You might also argue that the text-message thing was just a bit of theater designed to make the nation's big media outlets chase the story of Obama's pick more feverishly. But that's silly. It's a presidential race -- the pack couldn't get any hungrier."

Whatever the reason, it worked. You people have been talking about it nonstop for the past week...and you still are!

Sheldon

The Obama campaign's use of text messaging and e-mail to notify supporters that Joe Biden was Barack Obama's pick for Vice President shows the role of high tech in the 2008 race.

SDP

Barrack Obama is indeed an eloquent speaker. He has managed to woo the LCD (aka, lowest common denominator) of the American public by his charismatic, yet mostly empty, rhetoric. If you don’t listen carefully, indeed he is convincing. But I challenge anyone to provide just one true QUALIFICATION that Obama posses to become President of the largest free country in the world (aka, the USA) – I’m not talking about a traditional idealistic characteristic, such as “he’s a change agent” or some over-simplified garbage. But I’d truly like some Obama supporter to provide a plus-and-minus advantage over a candidate that is as truly consistent, experienced, and independently-minded as John McCain. Just one truly intelligent qualification. Signed, an independent woman voter for McCain.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video


Categories


Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »

Archives
 


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.



In Case You Missed It...