Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Surfers vs. stoners: Is nothing sacred?

July 3, 2008 |  7:22 am

The O.C. Register's Cindy Carcamo reports on a protest the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws is planning at the U.S. Open of Surfing in Huntington Beach later this month. Because surfers never smoke pot, the organization was denied a booth at the event.

OK, that's not exactly the reason, and an official claims the problem was a hinky application:

James Leitz, executive producer of the U.S. Open of Surfing, said the group was denied a booth this year because he said they had misrepresented themselves last year, applying under the guise of another organization.

Leitz said last year an Anaheim man handed in an application under the vendor name of "Steve's List." The application didn't mention marijuana, according to Leitz and a copy of the document given to the Register.

"Then all of a sudden all of this marijuana stuff goes up in the booth," Leitz said. "That alone right there is not how we play. I don't care who you are… That's a check mark against you."

Steve Lawrence who put in the application for Steve's List said that he spoke to an organizer last year and let her know that his Web site www.steveslist.info was dedicated to the cannibas patient community. The Web site is now defunct.

Maybe because I can imagine a guy just being too stoned to fill out the application properly, I was ready to believe Leitz' explanation, but then he says this:

"I myself personally have to worry about the 8-year-old kid... I have to worry about the message we're sending," Leitz said. "I have to worry about the family-friendly atmosphere. I think OC NORML's message … or what have you is vague. We just don't think it's appropriate for the family-friendly nature of the event."

Vote in the Register's freedomblogging poll on legalization of "M," or "binky," as marijuana eaters themselves call it.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

The war for the public image of surfing has been going on since Christian missionaries first saw Hawaiians surfing...

I remember when the clean cut image came back to surfing in the '80s. ...clean cut surfers did the same things surfers have always done.

Spending so much time at the beach is a raunchy business. ...even if you're doing it in Orange County.

It's like a biker culture that's always projected a "Leave it to Beaver" image. I think it's always been that way.

...surfers have probably always had self-appointed ambassadors who've taken it upon themselves to project a nice wholesome image.

It makes me think of the old bikers' adage about society only needing to worry about 1% of the bikers out there. Except in surfing, it's probably more like half of 'em they should be worried about.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts
Thanksgiving thoughts |  November 27, 2009, 8:58 am »
Chapter and verse on a litmus test |  November 24, 2009, 6:44 pm »
Dream (or nightmare) team |  November 24, 2009, 11:16 am »
Making a list and checking it seven times |  November 24, 2009, 11:13 am »

Archives