Deanne Stillman: Let's head off the horse thieves at the pass
On June 2, Deanne Stillman wrote an Op-Ed on the sorry state of wild horse protection in the American west. Her book on the horses, “Mustang: The Saga of the Wild Horse in the American West,” has since gone on to garner excellent reviews in The Times and elsewhere. She sent us this update:
This week, the Bush administration’s Bureau of Land Management dropped a bombshell: wild horses and burros, supposedly under its protection, may be euthanized. The rationale was familiar — financial problems and the difficulties of controlling wild horse populations . But independent researchers question whether horse populations in the wild are out of control, and the BLM budget for the wild horse and burro program is only $39 million per year, not much in the scheme of federal allocations: It ought to be increased. After all, you can’t really put a price on our heritage (for those who think you can, see my recent Newsweek interview, which offers an easy solution to the BLM’s alleged budget problem).
Since the BLM issued its statement, I’ve been asked by many people if I’m surprised. In one way, I am. For the past eight years, the president has wrapped himself in the flag and then, three days before the Fourth of July, comes a plan that could destroy one of the nation’s greatest symbols. It’s the most unpatriotic thing I’ve ever heard of. Consider this: America was born in the hoof sparks of Paul Revere’s ride (and incidentally, his horse, Brown Beauty, was a descendant of the horses that came to these shores with conquistadors — the foundation stock for today’s mustangs).
On the other hand, I’m not surprised at all. The livestock lobby has been trying to purge public lands of wild horses since 1971, when federal protections for them were enacted. As I said in my op-ed, their efforts have reached a peak under the Bush administration.
The tolling of the bell for mustangs will also please another constituency — those who are clamoring for public lands to build theme parks, extract more minerals, or pump out more oil and gas. Wild horses live on public lands, in protected herd areas. Fewer horses require smaller, or no, protected areas. You get the picture.
Certainly, the BLM knew its announcement would elicit shock, outrage and opposition. As Virginia Parant, campaign director of the American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, told me in an email, in the end, the agency will likely fall back to other options, also disturbing, and present them as more palatable — gelding stalliions in the wild, or “instant titling,” which means immediately awarding mustangs to prospective adopters, instead of the current process that requires the government to check that the horses are cared for properly and not shipped to slaughterhouses, before the deal is finalized.
When he announced the possibility of euthanization, the BLM deputy director Henri Bisson said that the government considered a halt to rounds ups but that would lead to “ecological disaster.” And yet, again as I explained in my Op-Ed, the BLM’s assessments of “appropriate management levels” for the horses and the range are underfunded and often out of date. In fact, wild horses are an integral part of wilderness ecology, and the ecological disaster on the range is the one that stems from over-grazing of cattle, as studies dating back to the Teddy Roosevelt administration have repeatedly shown.
As we gather on July 4th and watch wild horses parade down Main Street in military mounted units — let’s hoist a beer to the animals who helped blaze our trails, fight our wars and settle the West — and then, next week, when the party’s over, let’s contact our representatives and head off the horse thieves at the pass.
— Deanne Stillman
An earlier version of this post misspelled Deanne Stillman's first name.


Deanne Stillman's recent works have been spot on considering the mis-information being spread. At least most of the mis-information has been in small po-dunk publications.
This same kind of thing happened in the 1980's while James Watt was in charge of the Dept of the Interior, it resulted in tens of thousands of wild horses being sent to slaughter.
Posted by: Duane Burright | July 04, 2008 at 09:49 PM
DEANNA- " This week, the Bush administration’s Bureau of Land Management dropped a bombshell: wild horses and burros, supposedly under its protection, may be euthanized. The rationale was familiar — financial problems and the difficulties of controlling wild horse populations . "
U are so right to come up with this feed back on such drastic measures over a NATIONAL SYMBOL.
Have U thought of another "sick act" they have for FLIES in Colton, CA area?? Go do some research on these outlandesh crazy man made absurd laws on decent peoples land. FISH & WILDLIFE have not seen a darn FLY on this land & they call "the FLIES" endangered species ? The land owners have to pay taxes & they cant use the land. What sort of law is this? FEDERAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION - CARLSBAD CA.
You are great to stand up to absurd "whims & fancY" of some TWIT in office as I call them in any Gov. office. They are known to have double standards & talk a load of rubbish to justify they stupid stance on what they can do in office. Have U heard gov. officers say this,- "HEY! I CAN DO WHAT I WANT,," It will make U sick.
GOOD LUCK TO UR GOOD WORKS !!
Posted by: magg | July 05, 2008 at 09:03 AM
You have got to be kidding.
The wild horse situation is shameful. So is the situation with horse slaughter, and why? Because of single-issue zealots such as Ms. Stillman here, who refuse to consider facts and or consequences that might interfere with their romantic vision of horsey Utopia.
One: Horses are an exotic. Doesn't matter that equine precedents were here before the glaciers and the Indians...they left, and the New World evolved without them, while the horse evolved in the Old World.
Two: Horses breed at 20 percent a year.
Three: A dead horse is over a ton. Wanna bury that in your backyard now that there's no slaughter?
Four: BLM cannot place these horses in good homes, because there aren't enough horse people who want them.
Five: Tell me how horses taken from the "wild" range and placed in managed pasture in Oklahoma can be really and truly wild.
Six: Again, who's gonna pay for all this? Not wild-horse lovers. There's a ranch in Wyoming, tried to private-sector wild-horse preservation...THEY WENT BROKE and are now seeking other avenues.
I think wild horses are sort of cool, within reason. But like any other resource, they benefit from proper management. That means culling herds where needed. That means selling some off to good homes, and it means sending the rest either to the glue factory or French dinner plates. Period.
Posted by: Dave Skinner | July 05, 2008 at 09:54 AM
"..let’s hoist a beer to the animals who helped blaze our trails, fight our wars and settle the West.."
Without horses mankind would still be living in its own filth in caves. The domestication of the horse is a milestone in the history of human civilization. The ships that carried European explorers and New World immigrants could not have been built without horses. These strong and beasts, obediently dragging the giant logs from the mountains to the sea to be turned into ships masts by lathes using horses for steady power.
I could go on, but I won't, suffice to say that man owes the horse more than is realized by "modernity". The Wild Mustangs of this article deserve, no their species has earned the expectation of good stewardship for their well being. It's a debt we owe them. Without horses there would be no human civilization.
Posted by: Buckoux | July 05, 2008 at 10:07 AM
I call you, my dear....
Like a magical
fear, in my heart,
there's always
a footprint that
now disappears in
the light of a pathway,
and there my
desire gives an
attention to some
beautiful birds.
Francesco Sinibaldi
Posted by: Francesco Sinibaldi | July 05, 2008 at 01:23 PM