Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine...

ballot measureelectioninitiativelos angeles timesopinion l.a.parolevictims' rights

Initiative number nine just qualified for California's November 4 presidential ballot. This one, not yet assigned a proposition number, is designated a victims' rights measure. It deals mostly with parole, increasing the ability of victims and their families to testify and reducing the number of parole hearings to which prisoners are entitled. Here's the attorney general's title and summary:

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.  VICTIMS’ RIGHTS.  PAROLE.  CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.  Requires notification to victim and opportunity for input during phases of criminal justice process, including bail, pleas, sentencing and parole.  Establishes victim safety as consideration in determining bail or release on parole.  Increases the number of people permitted to attend and testify on behalf of victims at parole hearings.  Reduces the number of parole hearings to which prisoners are entitled.  Requires that victims receive written notification of their constitutional rights.  Establishes timelines  and  procedures  concerning  parole  revocation  hearings.  Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government:  Unknown potential increases in state prison and county jail operating costs due to provisions restricting early release of inmates.  To the extent that any such costs were incurred, they could collectively amount to hundreds of millions of dollars annually.  A potential net savings in the low tens of millions of dollars for the administration of parole reviews and revocations if the changes related to parole revocation procedures were not overturned by potential legal challenges.  (Initiative 07-0100.)

Maybe it sounds better backwards. Number nine, number nine, number nine. Everyone of them knew that as time went by they'd get a little bit older and a little bit slower. As for the first eight initiatives, look here and despair: a gay marriage ban, the umpteenth parental notification abortion measure, trains, children's hospitals, get-tough-on-gangs, renewable energy, and on and on. There will almost certainly be a 10th, 11th and 12th — prison bond, redistricting and alternative fuels.

The deadline for qualifying a ballot measure for the November election is June 26.


Comments () | Archives (2)

The comments to this entry are closed.


Continue to claim they all need to be in prison and just see what it is going to cost you. We have traded in schools for prisons. Release the disabled and free up bed space for those prisoners who are a threat to society.

Federal Judges act on prison overcrowding!
Federal Judges act on prison overcrowding.

Please watch these two news feeds from KTVU, Channel 2, news in San Francisco to get a better idea on where the prison Federal cases are headed on prison overcrowding and medical care. Release the disabled and free up bed space for those prisoners who are a threat to society. Save taxpayers millions of dollars



Darren Shupe

I've argued for years that the process for amending the California Constitution needs to be much tougher than it is at present. I'd support a 2/3 majority requirement, or even 3/4, and I wouldn't be averse to requiring the concurrence of both houses of the Legislature.

The conditions - railroad robber barons and other special interests dominating Sacramento - that prevailed when the Progressives designed the system of initiative, referendum and recall during the early part of the last century have changed, and allowing Constitutional amendments every time a hot-button issue hits the news is no way to maintain a stable government and cheapens the document's status as a foundational code of law.



In Case You Missed It...



Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.

In Case You Missed It...