Supreme Court gives immigrants a little leeway
You can thank (or malign) the Supreme Court for decreasing the number of illegal immigrants -- not with fancy fencing but with a rule switch.
In a 5-4 decision today, the court decided (pdf) that an illegal immigrant who has agreed to depart voluntarily can instead stick around while trying to get approval to remain in the U.S. (Voluntary departure grants the immigrant some privileges -- they are likelier to be allowed back into the states, for example.) The ruling will make it easier for immigrants who find themselves a few documents short of legal status and want to get their papers in order even as their visas lapse.
Prominent immigrants' rights lawyers and advocates filed in favor (pdf) of the man at the center of this case, Nigerian Samson Dada, who overstayed a tourist visa and married an American, but couldn't get a visa as a citizen's spouse. That story probably won't win sympathy with those inclined to be tough on illegal immigration. But as the advocates note, voluntary departure is a confusing and unclear process for the immigrant agreeing to it (sort of like the entire visa regime). And, regardless of whether an immigrant leaves of his own will or reopens his case, the government avoids deportation costs. Most significantly, with this ruling, the Supreme Court has ensured that the U.S. sticks to the stated goals of its immigration policy: granting valid claims for residence and keeping families together. (As the advocates note, one-third of unauthorized immigrant families have mixed status.)
You can find some more documents and background here and here.


Just another example of a government entity denying AMERICANS our safety, rights and freedoms.
The Supreme Court should hang it's head in shame, for allowing We, the People be subjected to illegal criminality.
Where have all the brilliant minds gone? Isn't that one of the qualifications to represent the will of AMERICANS?
Elected officials are OUR EMPLOYEES...not ILLEGALS!!
WE vote them into office...NOT ILLEGALS!!! They are IN office to represent AMERICAN CITIZEN'S rights...NOT ILLEGALS!!!!!
Posted by: William Schmitz | June 17, 2008 at 03:31 AM
This liberal court is pushing its one agenda and pushing ILLEGAL - ALIENS down Americas throat.
I cant be too shocked this is California the socialist strong hold of the west., but to be so openly against the rule of LAW is disgusting!
These are criminals and needed to be treated as such with deportation and fine against the companies that hired them.
The judges need to step down as they are not following the law but their own personal opinions.
I cant wait for their decision to be over turned by a bigger court and the AMERICAN voter!
Posted by: Hernandez, proud US | June 17, 2008 at 07:48 AM
It is so none american for people with children and are trying to become legal for ice to treat them like the slaves were treated in the us. These are humans and do not have any crimes. Treat them with respect. takeing family apartand leaving children with friends is not the way to go.
Posted by: jesse lopez | June 17, 2008 at 08:20 AM
Some of the people I see commenting, hear speaking and who take issue with illegal immigrants and immigration are so blatantly biased its disgusting. To make it worse, they choose to be so by ignoring facts and evidence that directly contradicts just about EVERYTHING they say.
One person commented "Where have all the brilliant minds gone?", the minds of our politicians can only be as sharp as the sharpest mind in the pool from which we select, and people, the pool is shallow. Speaking of which, that is ONE reason immigrants are and have ALWAYS been so important to this country... Human Capital. Many are eager to work or learn and have a determination and dedication we wish we could instill in OUR children.
The fact is, EVERYONE seems to group all immigrants into the same category and tout this "criminal offense" as the reason they are so bad. Almost all of you have at some point committed a crime, whether on purpose or inadvertently. Have you lied on your taxes lately? Even about a dollar here or there? YOU are guilty of a crime! A FEDERAL offense actually. And unless the immigrant has forged documents, their crime s less than yours. Moving along, there are many immigrants who are here, not because they intended to commit a crime, but they were brought here by parents who simply wanted better lives for their children, now, all grown up, these children have become targets of your insensitive, uneducated attacks. Third, not all illegal immigrants are MEXICANS! Grow up people, look at the real world. The people who are here from Africa, China, Venezuela, even Haiti, those who are here to escape persecution. MOST of them are better citizens than you. They go to work, they pay taxes, they stay out of trouble for fear of being caught... Their only concern is being able to take care of their family.
The truth is, many immigrants are well educated and actually give up sometimes jobs and positions in society way above the ones they are forced into here. Why? They truly understand that the freedoms we have in America are worth sacrifice. YOU feel entitled and have no idea what it means to sacrifice something for a freedom. You complain that your government is violating rights in the name of national security... You have no idea.
And NO, the REAL facts state that these people actually AVOID doctors and hospitals unless they have LIFE THREATENING injuries or ailments. They ARE NOT a stress on our health system.
Lastly, lets not forget that a large majority of you, your ancestors came here illegally. Due to different laws and times, they were allowed to assimilate. They BECAME Americans and were so appreciative they became true patriots. If afforded the same privilege, many of these immigrants would prove how much they love and are loyal to this country.
And those of you who THINK your long lineage entitles you to be here, unless you are a true native American, YOUR ancestors committed crimes that we now bomb and hang people for committing. GENOCIDE and SLAVERY. Get over yourselves.
Through all this, I do not think we should allow EVERY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT to stay here, but there needs to be more discussion of who could be and is a benefit to this country and who is not. Of course, those who commit crimes beyond overstaying their Visa should be punished, imprisoned, fined or deported. But consider the Jamaican woman that takes care of your grandmother in the nursing home, or your European Au Pair. Consider the child who never knew another home. The 18 year old honor student who just wants to attend college and be a doctor, lawyer, nurse or engineer. THEY DON'T deserve to be labeled criminals.
I welcome corrections, intellectual responses or debate and questions.
Posted by: JEM | June 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM
The GAO came out with a report that 93% of the time undercover agents got into this country with fake radioactive materia at the borderl.And at ports of entry were not even asked for I.D.!So they are stopping about 7 % of illegals. Yet we go to the stinking airport and someone is feeling out our wife,sticking a wand between the legs making us wait for hours and we are paying BILLIONS for that and here the stinking illegals are coming in by the millions and the courts say great job Jose.
Lets get some communist in here ,build that wall and throw Bush,Chertoff, the judges and the millions of illegal Mexicans that are here over that g**d*** wall.It's sickening.........
Posted by: dharc | June 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Hernandez wrote:
"The judges need to step down as they are not following the law but their own personal opinions.
I cant wait for their decision to be over turned by a bigger court and the AMERICAN voter!"
Hey Hernandez! There IS NO bigger court than the Supreme Court! LOL What a moron!
Posted by: DavidIsWorking | June 17, 2008 at 03:08 PM
*** "the Supreme Court has ensured that the U.S. sticks to the stated goals of its immigration policy: granting valid claims for residence and keeping families together." ***
Now for a silly question: why is it these immigrants always choose to do their reuniting HERE? Why don't they choose to be reunited in Nigeria or India or Mexico? I'd have to bet that in 98%+ of the interanational marriages between, say, Indians an Americans, or Pakistanis and Britains, their reuniting takes place in the USA or Britain, respectively, and not in India or Pakistan.
As for family reunification? If you can't bear to be apart from your 800 nearest and dearest relatives, then don't come here.
Besides that, why should we, through family reunification (wth your brother, his wife, her siblings, their husbands and wives, and so on and so on and so on), give control of our immigration policy to foreigners? Why should an immigrant from Somalia have more say over who comes here next than a native born citizen like me?
Posted by: Bill | June 17, 2008 at 08:28 PM
*** "KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, J., joined. ALITO, J.,filed a dissenting opinion." ***
Hmmm...I guessed perfectly how they aligned before I even saw the opinion. Ginsburg especially has made it quite clear she no longer respects the limits placed on her powers by the Constitution itself. So why should we respect her decision?
Posted by: Bill | June 17, 2008 at 08:31 PM
*** "Speaking of which, that is ONE reason immigrants are and have ALWAYS been so important to this country... Human Capital." ***
Current immigration - but Illegal immigration especially - is actually decreasing average human capital in the USA. Google "NAEP" scores to get a look at how California now fares compared to the rest of the country. It's down near Mississippi.
*** "Many are eager to work or learn and have a determination and dedication we wish we could instill in OUR children." ***
The children and even grandchildren of illegal immigrants have much higher dropout rates and higher crime rates than the average population of the USA, too. Google "Heather Mac Donald" + "The Myth of Hispanic Family Values" for more on that.
*** "Almost all of you have at some point committed a crime, whether on purpose or inadvertently. Have you lied on your taxes lately? Even about a dollar here or there? YOU are guilty of a crime! A FEDERAL offense actually. And unless the immigrant has forged documents, their crime s less than yours." ***
Perhaps we've all committed crimes, but is tolerating and rewarding lawbreaking the best way to ENCOURAGE respect for the law? I've lost all repsect for it since I started noticing how rich businessmen get away with employing illegals - because they're rich and influential. As for their crime being less than mine? If they have a single child in public school that alone costs their state roughly $8,000 annually, money their meager taxes never compensates for. Plus millions of illegals work off the books and don't bother filing tax returns at all.
*** "Moving along, there are many immigrants who are here, not because they intended to commit a crime, but they were brought here by parents who simply wanted better lives for their children, now, all grown up, these children have become targets of your insensitive, uneducated attacks." ***
Their parents managed to accomodate adjusting to a strange foreign country (the USA). I'm sure their children will manage to adjust to their native land just fine, especially since many of them already speak the native language.
"Uneducated attacks"? I've got data behind my "attacks." How 'bout you?
*** "Third, not all illegal immigrants are MEXICANS! Grow up people, look at the real world. The people who are here from Africa, China, Venezuela, even Haiti, those who are here to escape persecution." ***
Persecution is seldom caused by one person. It's caused by interactions between two or more people. It takes two to tango, as they say. These people are often as responsible for their alleged persecution as the people who perescuted them. Besides, by allowing them into our country we're only facilitating the persecutors by making it easier for them to get rid of people they don't like.
*** "MOST of them are better citizens than you. They go to work, they pay taxes, they stay out of trouble for fear of being caught... Their only concern is being able to take care of their family. " ***
How the hell do you know what kind of citizen I am??? How dare you accuse people you don't even know of such a thing. Better citizens than me WHY?
*** "The truth is, many immigrants are well educated and actually give up sometimes jobs and positions in society way above the ones they are forced into here. Why? They truly understand that the freedoms we have in America are worth sacrifice. YOU feel entitled and have no idea what it means to sacrifice something for a freedom." ***
Sacrifice for what? And how? Are we expecting them to join the military? Are they paying higher taxes than me?
Sorry, dufus, but the people who come here illegally for the most part aren't sacrificing squat. They're coming here knowing full well that their material well-being will increase. The only question is, "Will it increase five-fold or ten-fold?"
*** "You complain that your government is violating rights in the name of national security... You have no idea." ***
What rights are being violated - their right to live in a country that isn't theirs? Do I have reciprocal rights to live in their country illegally, too? No, of course not. China would kick me out in a Shanghai minute.
*** "And NO, the REAL facts state that these people actually AVOID doctors and hospitals unless they have LIFE THREATENING injuries or ailments. They ARE NOT a stress on our health system." ***
Then why are so many border town hospitals going belly up? Why are hospitals all over the country begging the government to reimbiurse them for treatment for illegals?
*** "Lastly, lets not forget that a large majority of you, your ancestors came here illegally." ***
Yep - they came here uninvited. They cheated the natives of their land. They unwittingly introduced diseases to which the natives had no natural immunity.
The law of nations is the law of the jungle. You own only what you're strong enough to control. Are we supposed to now give it away for free, no matter how much it harms our own children's future?
*** "If afforded the same privilege, many of these immigrants would prove how much they love and are loyal to this country." ***
If increasing patriotism is your true goal (doubtful), then answer me this: why are Americans today less likely to join the military today than we were 20 years ago?
True fact: in the mid-80s we had 2.2 million men and women (mostly men) in active duty service. Today (and even before 9/11) we were struggling to keep 1.5 million men and women in uniform, even though we have 70 million more people now than in 1985 and far more positions are open to women.
People won't die for a country that isn't theirs, and our immigration policies, designed to enrich big business and cheapen the price of labor, mean that people more than ever don't fee any great love for "their country."
*** "And those of you who THINK your long lineage entitles you to be here, unless you are a true native American, YOUR ancestors committed crimes that we now bomb and hang people for committing. GENOCIDE and SLAVERY. Get over yourselves." ***
Oh, the "genocide" thing. I kinda suspected you were an ignorant troll, but I wasn't really sure until now.
*** "Through all this, I do not think we should allow EVERY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT to stay here, but there needs to be more discussion of who could be and is a benefit to this country and who is not." ***
Where are we gunna get the bureaucracy large enough to sort through 15 million people and decide who's worthy of staying and who is not? What about the other 15 million people who will cross over as soon as they find out we're handing out citizensip like candy? Who's gunna validate all their documents? We don't even know that these people are who they say they are.
*** "I welcome corrections, intellectual responses or debate and questions." ***
Thank you. All your racist and ignorant comments have now been corrected.
Posted by: Bill | June 17, 2008 at 09:06 PM
World's toughest immigration rules yet has the largest illegal population. World's biggest economy yet people shoot for $10. World's best justice system yet has the largest prison population. World's most free country yet emails watched over by government and gays cannot marry. World's best technology and brains yet cannot control a simple fire or tornado. World's best health system yet largest number of heart and diabetes patients. Watch American televison drug ADS and one can conclude it is a land of sick people. And finally who is mating whom and who is whose kid ? Nobody knows. Disintegrating families and Americans need special days like Mother's day to thank their moms !!! A bizarre, funny and perverted country.
Posted by: Ranjit | June 17, 2008 at 10:29 PM
UPDATE:
***Sacrifice for what? And how? Are we expecting them to join the military?***
***If increasing patriotism is your true goal (doubtful), then answer me this: why are Americans today less likely to join the military today than we were 20 years ago?
True fact: in the mid-80s we had 2.2 million men and women (mostly men) in active duty service. Today (and even before 9/11) we were struggling to keep 1.5 million men and women in uniform, even though we have 70 million more people now than in 1985 and far more positions are open to women.
People won't die for a country that isn't theirs, and our immigration policies, designed to enrich big business and cheapen the price of labor, mean that people more than ever don't fee any great love for "their country."***
"According to data from the Department of Defense, more than 65,000 immigrants (non-US citizens and naturalized citizens) were serving on active duty in the US Armed Forces as of February 2008. Since September 2001, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has naturalized more than 37,250 foreign-born members of the US Armed Forces and granted posthumous citizenship to 111 service members.
The current presence of immigrants in the military has a number of historical precedents. According to USCIS, the foreign born composed half of all military recruits by the 1840s and 20 percent of the 1.5 million service members in the Union Army during the Civil War."
http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?id=683
Posted by: JEM | June 18, 2008 at 03:22 PM
UPDATED:rac•ism (rā'sĭz'əm), n.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
ig•no•rant (ˈig-n(ə-)rənt), adj
lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified
Bill, I don't know how me speaking of how one should consider others and their circumstance regardless of race or origin makes me racist, or how me making statements based on research, facts and history and THEN welcoming correction or criticism makes me ignorant, but, I digress.
***Current immigration - but Illegal immigration especially - is actually decreasing average human capital in the USA. Google "NAEP" scores to get a look at how California now fares compared to the rest of the country. It's down near Mississippi.***
***The children and even grandchildren of illegal immigrants have much higher dropout rates and higher crime rates than the average population of the USA, too. Google "Heather Mac Donald" + "The Myth of Hispanic Family Values" for more on that.***
This is exactly what I referenced when I spoke of the assumption that ALL IMMIGRANTS ARE MEXICAN, or even HISPANIC. California is NOT the only state affected by immigration first off, and even then, the Majority of the immigrants in California, ARE Hispanic, hence, yes, Hispanics and especially Mexicans experience high dropout rates etc... That does not mean ALL IMMIGRANTS, legal or illegal are delinquent. There are many other races of immigrants who enter this country who do not suffer the same fate as their Hispanic counterparts. According to Ms. Mac Donald "This out-of-wedlock teen-birth rate is three times that of white teens, and significantly more than that of blacks as well."
Just so you know, the studies group Caribbean, and African immigrants into the "black" population.
***Perhaps we've all committed crimes, but is tolerating and rewarding lawbreaking the best way to ENCOURAGE respect for the law?***
We don't tolerate and/or reward anyone’s crimes. My main concern is immigrants that have families here, children born here... It is not fair to punish a CHILD for things they may not even understand, just as it’s not ok to sentence a mentally incapacitated person to death. And by your logic, since you are so concerned with upholding the law (doubtful), we should be after every person who lies about a dollar on their tax report. I'm sure the money adds up.
***I've lost all repsect for it since I started noticing how rich businessmen get away with employing illegals - because they're rich and influential.***
I won't comment much on the issue of business people, THEY are part of the problem unrelated to the immigrants themselves other than being exploiters of individuals who will jump at ANY opportunity for work.
***As for their crime being less than mine? If they have a single child in public school that alone costs their state roughly $8,000 annually, money their meager taxes never compensates for.***
The children in public schools you talk about, MOST of them ARE citizens of this country by birth and CANNOT be deported. THEY WILL pay taxes and ARE ENTITLED to public schooling.
***Plus millions of illegals work off the books and don't bother filing tax returns at all.***
Moot point. Millions of Citizens and LEGAL immigrants also work off the books. Bartenders, Bar backs and dishwashers (who are not all immigrants or illegal), waiters... the problem here is not the immigrants but a capitalistic greed driven society. If it wasn't immigrants it'd be someone else, it'd be blacks... it was at one point actually. Maybe we should deport them all too, after all, they mainly came here as slaves (immigrants), illegally, and were largely uneducated and were a drain on infrastructure no? hmm...
***Their parents managed to accomodate adjusting to a strange foreign country (the USA). I'm sure their children will manage to adjust to their native land just fine, especially since many of them already speak the native language.***
Yes, their parents adjusted, they made a choice to do so. Children of immigrants born here know nothing of their "native land" in reality. By definition, the USA IS their native land and English their native language. Additionally, MANY immigrants DON'T speak or are not proficient in their parents' native language.
***"Uneducated attacks"? I've got data behind my "attacks." How 'bout you?***
"DATA" comes in many forms and is usually skewed by those taking it as rarely does anyone collect data to prove themselves wrong. Most data is collected with the purpose of proving a point. I could find lots of data to support an argument that women are inferior to men, doesn't make it true.
***Persecution is seldom caused by one person. It's caused by interactions between two or more people. It takes two to tango, as they say. These people are often as responsible for their alleged persecution as the people who perescuted them. Besides, by allowing them into our country we're only facilitating the persecutors by making it easier for them to get rid of people they don't like.***
This one, well you should burn for this one. Are you DAFT!? Women who suffer at the hands of men who think its OK to perform acts of genitalia mutilation, institutionalized degradation and abuse...they are "as responsible for their ALLEGED persecution as the people who persecute them" Africans being killed just for being part of a certain tribe or group, being hunted and killed like animals... they wanted to "tango". Facilitating the persecutors? yes, lets send the ones who happen to escape, like very few do, back home to die, shall we? Ugh...
***How the hell do you know what kind of citizen I am??? How dare you accuse people you don't even know of such a thing. Better citizens than me WHY?***
You sir are correct, I don't, and it is wrong of me to assume. By the same right, many immigrants are model citizens aside from their initial lawbreaking whether entering or staying illegally. Don't forget that MANY immigrants also arrive here, not by crossing the border, but by legally immigrating and then OVERSTAYING valid visa limitations.
***Sacrifice for what? And how? Are we expecting them to join the military? Are they paying higher taxes than me?***
***If increasing patriotism is your true goal (doubtful), then answer me this: why are Americans today less likely to join the military today than we were 20 years ago?...in the mid-80s we had 2.2 million men and women...Today (and even before 9/11) we were struggling to keep 1.5 million...People won't die for a country that isn't theirs, and our immigration policies, designed to enrich big business and cheapen the price of labor, mean that people more than ever don't fee any great love for "their country."***
***Sorry, dufus, but the people who come here illegally for the most part aren't sacrificing squat. They're coming here knowing full well that their material well-being will increase. The only question is, "Will it increase five-fold or ten-fold?"***
First off, you ignored the part where I said "The truth is, many immigrants are well educated and actually give up sometimes jobs and positions in society way above the ones they are forced into here." There are Cuban DOCTORS who come here and end up as dishwashers, Indian Tech specialists who now work in low paying low prospect jobs from cab drivers to grocery store clerks... the list continues. People leave lives in which they were well off economically in exchange for political and social freedoms we take for granted. Their material well being in some cases actually decreases.
Second, According to data from the Department of Defense, more than 65,000 immigrants (non-US citizens and naturalized citizens) were serving on active duty in the US Armed Forces as of February 2008. Since September 2001, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has naturalized more than 37,250 foreign-born members of the US Armed Forces and granted posthumous citizenship to 111 service members. (The 2005 numbers reflected 35,000 and about 8,000 joining each year.)
The current presence of immigrants in the military has a number of historical precedents. According to USCIS, the foreign born composed half of all military recruits by the 1840s and 20 percent of the 1.5 million service members in the Union Army during the Civil War. http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?id=683
ALL IMMIGRANTS, legal or not are REQUIRED to register for selective service when they turn 18. They are subject to the draft like everyone else. Additionally, even if they skip out on registration, like many citizens also do... They have NO prospect of legalization unless they are registered. Immigrants pay taxes on earnings just like everyone else as long as their employers report it. Additionally, many undocumented immigrants pay taxes EVEN when they are using fake social security numbers, something not accounted for in the calculations of their contributions because many of these numbers are of deceased or other people. These earnings are hence not credited to the immigrant themselves and they receive no returns. Also, many immigrants can and do receive ITINs tax ID numbers with which they can file their taxes with the IRS. They do so knowing that if they intend to legalize, they will be required to pay these taxes plus IRS and other fines anyway.
...dufus? really? how old are you?
***What rights are being violated - their right to live in a country that isn't theirs? Do I have reciprocal rights to live in their country illegally, too? No, of course not. China would kick me out in a Shanghai minute.***
Since reading a sentence and taking it in context is difficult, let me help you. I was referring to the fact that the right violations that US residents complain about are minute compared to the ones that some immigrants suffer at home. YOU CAN'T have a "reciprocal RIGHT" to do something that is ILLEGAL... do I need to further answer that? But actually, most countries, especially the ones we see most of our immigrants from are quite lax with their immigration policy, especially when it comes to US citizens. For the most part, all you'd have to do is register... wanna go live in Haiti, Jamaica, or the Congo? Good riddance. Hope you're not gay... unlike us here, you can get chopped up or shot in your sleep for someone even suspecting you are a homosexual.
***Then why are so many border town hospitals going belly up? Why are hospitals all over the country begging the government to reimbiurse them for treatment for illegals?***
Do some more reading, "A survey conducted by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research suggests that uninsured legal immigrants are "the biggest drain on hospitals," not uninsured illegal immigrants."
533 undocumented Latino immigrants living in Los Angeles and Fresno Counties (California) were interviewed in 1996-1997. "A companion study of undocumented Latinos in Texas … was conducted in El Paso and Houston in 1996" (pg. 3).
Findings:
1. Undocumented Latinos immigrate to the U.S. to find work. "One percent or fewer of the undocumented Latinos in each site" stated that they entered the U.S. to obtain social services (pg. 6).
2. The government programs undocumented Latinos most use are:
a). Public school enrollment and free or reduced price lunches (many children are U.S. citizens)
b). Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
c). Medicaid (primarily for "non-emergency pregnancy related care and emergency care") (pg. 7).
d). Food stamps (for U.S. born children - undocumented immigrants are ineligible to receive food stamps).
TO RECAP- Public assistance is NOT available to illegals, and most of the money spent on caring for "illegals" is actually used for American born children or expecting mothers to ensure the health of their American born children.
Again, many illegals avoid hospitals,
"They may visit a clinic or hospital if they are severely ill. But for many undocumented immigrants, much of their health care is provided by a parallel system of spiritual healers, home remedies and self-medication.
Stories abound here of people who died — of cancer, diabetes, even gangrene — because they did not make it to an emergency room until it was too late. Public health officials also worry that the lack of access to conventional care may contribute to the spread of communicable diseases. They warn that the rampant use of antibiotics, often without medical direction, may speed the development of resistant bacterial strains...Immigrants interviewed amid the vineyards of Madera and the cantaloupe fields of Mendota said they had faced numerous obstacles to pursuing conventional medical care. Above all, they said, was cost, but other factors included fear of deportation, long waits for treatment in medically underserved areas, and barriers of culture and language...
There is no firm projection of the medical costs incurred by the estimated 11.1 million illegal immigrants in the United States, a fourth of whom reside in California. A RAND Corporation study pegged the cost in 2000 at $6.4 billion, including $1.1 billion from public sources. It found the share of medical costs attributable to illegal immigrants was half as large as expected for their share of the population. Health demographers estimate that half to two-thirds of California’s illegal immigrants are uninsured. Women may receive occasional check-ups because they qualify for prenatal and obstetrical care under the state’s Medicaid program. But RAND found that half of undocumented men had not seen a doctor in the previous year, compared to 25 percent of men born in the United States; one in six undocumented men had never seen a doctor.
Studies also find that newcomers are only half as likely as natives to use emergency rooms, which are required to treat patients regardless of immigration status. The California Hospital Association estimates that 10 percent of the state’s $9.7 billion in uncompensated care last year was for illegal immigrants, said Jan Emerson, an association spokeswoman.
“A lot of people assume the emergency room overcrowding problem is due to undocumented immigrants,” she said. “That’s not what we see. They show up when they truly need emergency care.”
Jurley Cortez, 20, an undocumented immigrant, has not been to an emergency room, doctor or dentist in her nine years in the United States, except for the perfunctory physical her school required for athletics. Now a high school graduate, she picks tomatoes and cantaloupe near Mendota.
Three years ago, when she injured a knee in the fields, her mother could not afford a doctor and took her to a sobadora. After several $20 treatments of ointment and massage, the swelling subsided. “It still hurts when it’s cold,” Ms. Cortez said. “I just take Tylenol or Advil.”"
---Source: New York Times
Author: Kevin Sack
Date: May 10, 2008---
***Oh, the "genocide" thing. I kinda suspected you were an ignorant troll, but I wasn't really sure until now.***
HaHa. I ask, how many Native Americans and others were slaughtered in the name of manifest destiny?
***Where are we gunna get the bureaucracy large enough to sort through 15 million people and decide who's worthy of staying and who is not? What about the other 15 million people who will cross over as soon as they find out we're handing out citizensip like candy? Who's gunna validate all their documents? We don't even know that these people are who they say they are.***
Where to start... according to multiple predictions, it would cost our government somewhere between either $41 billion per year (upward of 200 billion dollars over 5 years) after assuming that 2 million...would leave on their own–a pretty large assumption or more recently, "During a hearing with Julie L. Myers, chief of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, she asked, “Could you give us some idea of what the cost of trying to locate, detain and deport all of the 12 million people who are here illegally would be?”
Lo and behold, an answer shot back with ease: “Our agency has estimated that it would cost at least $94 billion.”"
You talked about how much it costs per year for 1 illegal immigrant's high school education... it costs $97 dollars a day to detain an immigrant, multiply that by the average 32 day detainment period, the by over 12million. Transportation alone is about $1000.00 per person, that's about $4000 right there. Now consider you'd be detaining whole families, then add the administrative costs, the cost of manpower, the additional strain on law enforcement officers and other agents, incidentals etc... You think we have the bureaucracy for THAT? No. it would actually be wiser to weigh the threat and disadvantages of certain immigrants and deport based on a systematic agenda to remove those who are detrimental (ones who are already in jail, have been convicted of crimes etc..) first, then shut down the borders to prevent additional immigrants from jumping. From there we can use information and verification systems already in place to remove immigrants as they present themselves as threats or as we find them. We don't have to give away citizenship to anyone, but allowing them to work legally, receive identification and other benefits without fear of immediate deportation or punishment so that we may verify their status etc... Provides us a safer and better USA. If they can legally and under documentation work, we can track them. If they have IDs, we can track them. Then, we can take a little more time to find out EXACTLY who they are and what their circumstance. In the mean time, they pay taxes etc and are NOT a drain on our economy. It will also prevent human rights violations, and wrongful detainment. We need to stop driving them further underground and SHUT DOWN THE BORDERS!!! That's a solution. The truth is, they are here now, and it is not feasible to send them ALL "home". Additionally, punishing innocent children or those who were brought here as children by forcing their families and often them into an unfamiliar "homeland" is as bad as me punishing a white American on the street because their ancestors may have had slaves, or killed a Native American or anybody for that matter. Or an African because THEIR ancestors helped in the slave trade, or a German because his Grand Father was a Nazi. Or closer to the heart, me punishing your children for your ignorance. I try to be open minded and objective, but the name calling and people taking stances on things without full knowledge is ridiculous. I encourage EVERYONE to look at ALL or AS MANY of the FACTS from AS MANY SOURCES as possible BEFORE making judgments. I DON'T have all the answers or facts and neither does Bill.
Again, I welcome corrections and comments. The whole point is for us all to learn and have intellectual exchanges of opinions and information.
Posted by: JEM | June 18, 2008 at 03:34 PM
****The law of nations is the law of the jungle. You own only what you're strong enough to control...
I could not have said it better myself. Immigrants have come to this continent since the days of Columbus and they will continue to arrive here no matter how hard this country tries to prevent it. Deal with it!!
Posted by: Immigrant | June 18, 2008 at 04:37 PM
*** "According to data from the Department of Defense, more than 65,000 immigrants (non-US citizens and naturalized citizens) were serving on active duty in the US Armed Forces as of February 2008. Since September 2001, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has naturalized more than 37,250 foreign-born members of the US Armed Forces and granted posthumous citizenship to 111 service members." ***
Immigrants comprise over 12% of the total US population (12% of 1.5 million would be 180,000 - meaning they're barely 1/3rd their proportion of the population). If there are only 65,000 immigrants in the military then they are underrepresented.
But more importantly, as I pointed out, open borders and the message it sends to potential citizen recruits - "This country is not yours - a person from China or Mexico has as much right to live here as you" - is that you are no longer volunteering to serve YOUR country.
Posted by: Bill | June 18, 2008 at 09:54 PM
*** "I DON'T have all the answers or facts and neither does Bill." ***
Maybe not all, but I do have some of the answers. The only answer the open borders freaks have is "NO."
Let's deny illegal immigrants driver's licenses. - "NO, that won't work."
Let's fine businesses who employ them. - "NO, that won't work.
Let's build a fence at the border. - "NO, that won't work."
Every solution that we suggest you open borders freaks say it won't work. No proof or justification, just "No." (Despite the fact that they have worked and are working in many states).
*** "We don't tolerate and/or reward anyone’s crimes. My main concern is immigrants that have families here, children born here... It is not fair to punish a CHILD for things they may not even understand, just as it’s not ok to sentence a mentally incapacitated person to death." ***
By rewarding the children you're rewardng the parents. Only about half the children of illegals are US citizens, and if they're parents can find somebody to leave them here with when they get deported then they can stay. But don't give me all this crap about "punishing children" and "tearing families apart" - that happens to every family when a parent gets sent to jail. Should we let out every convict in prison who has a child?
The arguments of the open borders/amnesty nuts are the most idiotic, inconsistent, and dishonest arguments I have every heard in my life.
Amnesty Nut: "Let's deter illegal immigration - by letting them stay here, giving them citizenship, in-state tuition, public schooling for their kids, and all the rest."
That sounds great! How about we treat car theft that way, too? Steal a car and we'll let you keep it, plus pay for your insurance and gas. Now that'll really deter theft.
Amnesty Nut: "Can't deport illegal aliens because that'll tear families apart."
Great! Let's let every criminal with a kid out of jail - because we sure don't wanna 'tear families apart.'
*** "And by your logic, since you are so concerned with upholding the law (doubtful), we should be after every person who lies about a dollar on their tax report. I'm sure the money adds up. " ***
A dollar here and there adds up - but not as fast as $8,000 here and $8,000 there. As for obeying every minute law? I will gladly do so if we enforce immigration laws - well worth it, to me.
*** "I won't comment much on the issue of business people, THEY are part of the problem unrelated to the immigrants themselves other than being exploiters of individuals who will jump at ANY opportunity for work." ***
But by supporting the illegal immigrants YOU ARE supporting the greedy, lawbreaking businessman. The two go hand in hand. You can't choose one but not the other.
Lie to yourself if you think you can do so, but you can't.
*** "The children in public schools you talk about, MOST of them ARE citizens of this country by birth and CANNOT be deported." ***
Most does not mean all. Actually it means maybe 50-60%. And even the "legal" kids would not be there if their parents illegal presence hadn't been ignored. The point is, legal or illegal, these kids are placing costs on the system that their parents taxes don't come close to paying for. Why the hell do you think this so-called economic "boom" has been so lousy for most Americans? Because it's coincided with the mass devaluing of labor caused by mass immigration (legal or illegal). Employers raking in massive profits don't have to give their workers any pay increases because labor is no so cheap.
There are two and only two ways to deal with this:
1) Leftist solution: Place much higher taxes on the rich employers who benefit from illegal labor. Give it to government to spend (and mis-spend). Economic growth will slow, millions of Americans will be put out of jobs, and will thus be added to the unemployment rolls.
2) Conservative solution: Attrition through enforcement. As the labor supply falls wages rise. A few business, unable to find the labor to meet their needs, will go belly up. Some businesses will relocate overseas. But the income of Americans, on average, will increase, and quality of life will improve.
The other "solution" is to simply keep doing what we're doing: allow illegals to stay and undermine American wages and quality of life. Watch as the gap between rich and poor continues to increase. Watch as our human capital decreases thanks to a bunch of uneducated illegals and their offspring (if you think their children are going to turn into Newtons and Einsteins keep dreaming, honey.)
Posted by: Bill | June 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM
**** Where to start... according to multiple predictions, it would cost our government somewhere between either $41 billion per year (upward of 200 billion dollars over 5 years) after assuming that 2 million...would leave on their own–a pretty large assumption or more recently, "During a hearing with Julie L. Myers, chief of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, she asked, “Could you give us some idea of what the cost of trying to locate, detain and deport all of the 12 million people who are here illegally would be?” Lo and behold, an answer shot back with ease: “Our agency has estimated that it would cost at least $94 billion.”" ****
A) Myers is an (unqualified) appointee of an admininstration that does NOT want immigration enforcement. Your answer is surprising and funny coming from someone who probably doesn't trust the Bush Administration an any other matter.
B) Google "Operation W-tback" (replace the dash with an "e"). It was the Eisenhower Administrations very effective (and cost effective) effort to remove hundreds of thousands of illegals.
C) The first line of enforcement is fining businesses who hire illegals. If the government collects fines from businesses who employ illegals the enforcement measures will largely pay for themselves. Not to mention the children of illegals who will no longer be filling up the schools.
Like I said above, all you're doing is screaming "No, No, No" to every solution we suggest. It's you guys who are providing the same old failed policies.
Try enforcement, nationwide, just for a year or so. Then if it doesn't work you can say so. But the reason open borders nuts don't want it to even be tried is because you all know IT WILL WORK.
Posted by: Bill | June 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM
People who say nothing can be done about the illegal
immigrants should read some world war 2 history.
The U.S. had 10 to 15 million citizens serving in the
military. We built 6 thousand ships. 300 thousand
aircraft. Hundreds of thousands of Jeeps, tanks, trucks, and armored personnel carrier. Millions of weapons.
Billions of rounds of amunition.
We developed atomic reactors and atomic bombs.
Fought and won wars in Europe and Asia.
All done in about 4 years.
Yes we could kick all illegals out of the country
if the country was not run by spineless corrupt
politicians.
We could have 250000 ICE agents .
If each agent caught one Illegal a week in
a year that would be about a million a month
or about 12 million a year
Posted by: Phil | June 19, 2008 at 02:13 AM
*** "We could have 250000 ICE agents. If each agent caught one Illegal a week in a year that would be about a million a month or about 12 million a year." ***
Good point about WW2, Phil. Except that we don't need 250,000 ICE agents - we already have about 1 million National Guard troops. Calling them up to help enforce immigration laws is perfectly legal (and Bush has already done so, to a VERY limited extent).
Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM
*** “Our agency has estimated that it would cost at least $94 billion.”" ***
Even assuming the total cost is accurate, $94 billion is not that much in relation to how much money Congress drops on one program or another - especially when you're talking about a program spread out over years. Far bills, transportation bills, and Iraq bills are typically much larger than $94 billion.
I also find it difficult to believe for this reason - if you hired and trained 100,000 new ICE agents - more than enough to do the job - you'd be looking at per employee costs of $940,000 per ICE agent, which is extremely unlikley.
You also have to consider, on the plus side, additional costs incurred because of illegal immigration - new schools, ESL programs, Head Start, food stamps and school lunches, more prisons, more pipes to pump less and less water.
"How much will enforcement cost the federal government?" is the wrong question. "What will be the net costs of effective enforcement?" is the right one.
Also, assuming that to get every single illegal immigrant out of the country that you would have to physically deport them all is silly. Once it is clear that we are serious about enforcement many - even most - will leave on their own. If we start walking into businesses and handing out $10,000 fines for every employed illegal, the businesses will fire them, they won't be able to find jobs, and they'll return to their home country on their own.
As the economy weakens many are believed to be leaving already. My guess is that we'll really start to notice this summer and into the start of the next school year. The economy and the high cost of gas means that the restaurant, hotel and construction industries - insudtries with high illegal employment - are in for a very bad summer.
I predict that we'll start to notice when kids go back to school in the fall and enrollment for ESL students drops significantly.
Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008 at 01:06 PM
Name 1 community that has benefitted by this endless flood of illegal immigrants.
I have lived in California for my entire life, and I have only seen cities and neighborhoods suffer when these people arrive.
Having grown up in Fontana California from 85 through 03, no one can convince me that Fontana is a better place now than it was in 1985. The flood of illegal immigrants completely destroyed the community.
LA is worse!!! Wake up people, they are destroying our culture, our language, and our quality of life.
Posted by: Casey | June 19, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Ahh Bill,
At this point its not even worth it anymore to actually respond to you really, because you pretty much proved that you are one of those people, the ones I spoke about in my first post, who are biased beyond reason. You repeatedly called me an "open border nut" or referred to open border nut, ignoring my statements SPECIFICALLY saying that "We need to stop driving them further underground and SHUT DOWN THE BORDERS!!! That's a solution."
The point is, shutting borders alone is not a solution, immigrants enter legally and overstay everyday. Denying ID and Licenses makes it IMPOSSIBLE to keep track of immigrants. I am ACTUALLY NOT OPPOSED to deportation of immigrants on a whole. What I do think is we should stop looking at the issue as a either open border or deport them all situation and get the facts and vote on a COMPREHENSIVE measure that would ACTUALLY solve the problems we experience with immigration.
And as I said, I am not a supporter of businesses profiting from illegal labor and they ARE part of the problem.
What you are completely BLIND to Bill is that we actually agree on a lot of things, you just think that YOU have the only solution. Truth is, its not as simple as it seems. The first issue is we HAVE immigration law on the books that we currently CANNOT enforce fully for numerous reason. What we are doing, even NOW with the raids everywhere is just putting a band aid on a cut without first cleaning it. Its going to eventually get infected. And that's the same thing you are proposing. We first need to figure out how deep the cut is and if it needs stitches. Otherwise we'll be right back here in 5 years. We don't have the resources to "try something for a year" then come back to the drawing board. We have to address the issue from ALL angles.
In regards to the 1/3 of immigrants who are in the country serving, there are over 300,000,000 (300 million) people in the US total, including the immigrants. We ONLY have about 3 million in the armed forces, and that's IF you count the 1.5 million who are RESERVISTS. Now, the 65,000 immigrants doesn't include reservists. Nor does it account for the fact that illegal immigrants ARE NOT allowed to, even if they WANT to, serve in the military barring a draft. THEY CANNOT VOLUNTEER. It seems like the number of citizens in the military is as underrepresented, if not more, than the immigrants. Actually, it seems that immigrant volunteer rates are better than that of US Born citizens. Now, of course all this data is subjective so I take it all with a grain of salt. They are not a calculation of the number of ELIGIBLE citizens or immigrants, which would probably largely affect the numbers. I made the military point because you seemed to have been missing some information on our nations policy and the number of immigrants ACTUALLY serving our country.
On the cost of deportation, I like how you only took and responded to PART of the quote I gave you. Myers didn't punch in the numbers on her calculator and give them to us, that was an agency calculation. And actually, I used her numbers for the sake of argument because they were ACTUALLY a lower estimate than previous estimates AND SHE did specifically say that the numbers did not include the possibility of people leaving voluntarily. Second, the 94 Billion would actually multiply if spread out over years, not decrease, you should learn how money and implementation works before arguing on the bureaucratic spending process. Also, since you weren't ACTUALLY reading the cost is not actually inclusive of hiring and training new agents. That would be additional moneys, again, INCREASING the 94 billion. The $94 billion estimate is based mainly on the cost of detention and transportation of illegals, additional beds, food and basic medical attention. And they are CONSERVATIVE estimates. There would actually be additional costs to train agents, work with local law enforcement etc. And building a fence and manning it with more agents does not get rid of the illegals already here...Again, it is only a STEP in a larger process we need to implement.
Again with the school thing, illegal parents or not, we have to accept that these kids are now citizens, having been born here. Its not even worth it to keep talking about them because they are just as much OUR responsibility now as they are their parents. I don't claim to make bleeding heart separation of family arguments, but like you said, evaluations need to be made on a case by case or systematic criterion basis. As for the welfare, food stamp, school lunch issues, again, the impacts you reference aren't completely true. ILLEGALS ARE NOT QUALIFIED FOR FEDERAL OR MOST STATE FUNDED BENEFITS. ONLY LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, CITIZENS or RESIDENTS GET THESE BENEFITS. In fact, some states now REQUIRE students to PROVE LEGAL RESIDENCE to even ATTEND school.
Additionally, since we want to talk about welfare and insist on referring to Mexicans and immigration almost synonymously, according to the numbers, Hispanics make up only 17% of those on welfare.
White 38.8%
Black 37.2
Hispanic 17.8
Asian 2.8
Other 3.4
Now, operation Wetback... Only deported $130,000 immigrants, not "hundreds of thousands", out of an estimated 4 million in the 3 or 4 states it targeted.. The INS CLAMS that about a million more left voluntarily based on some randomly acquired multiplier estimate of 9-1. Either way, that HARDLY qualifies as being a "very effective" effort. Not to mention the measure was ABANDONED for multiple reasons, one being CITIZENS being stopped and detained for being MEXICAN LOOKING. Not to say I don't admire Eisenhower ACTUALLY taking ACTION, but, had he thought it through some more, and developed a comprehensive plan that also sealed the borders and punish the farmers and businesses that drove illegal immigration back then (sound familiar?) we wouldn't be HERE 50 years later.
I reiterate, what we really need to do is invest in not just sealing our borders, but finding a way to secure what lies within our borders. That means making it easier to track illegals in the country by allowing them to receive identification then making sure they can't access ANY public resources without said ID. We could also then REQUIRE AND ENFORCE the payment of taxes. This alone would force half to come up for air or leave. Then we can find those who have children and maybe give them a limited time to stay with restriction, they would have to prove they could sustain themselves and their children without public assistance until adulthood, after which they would be required to leave and their now adult CITIZEN children could choose whether to leave as well or remain here as PRODUCTIVE citizens. Then we would implement the real ID verification system and fine companies for not complying and hiring illegals. We could also then consider children who are here currently who were not born here (see DREAM Act). This would also REQUIRE them to remain PRODUCTIVE members of society if they were to be allowed the PRIVILEGE to stay.
Now see? It will take a system of multiple approaches, including but not limited to these or similar measures to solve the problem of immigration. Then and only then can we ensure our nation's security and quality of life, while removing lawbreakers without enduring short or long term harm to our economy or additional strains on our already deficit budget.
Otherwise OUR children will be dealing with this very problem in the years to come even if we think we've "solve" it now. We have something immigrants want and if we don't properly secure it they will keep exploiting the holes we leave to get at it. They are only as dumb as the smartest person and some are pretty darn smart and determined.
Posted by: JEM | June 20, 2008 at 02:04 PM