| Main |

Immigration, my density has brought me to you

We recently featured a Blowback by Mark Cromer of Californians for Population Stabilization, claiming that this country's rancorous immigration debate has stopped a sensible discussion of sustainable population growth.

It seems the opposite is true in Britain, where fears of overpopulation are stirring immigration policy reform, and big-time Conservative politicians aren't afraid to link the two. The Telegraph reports:

The population of England will increase by a third over the next 50 years as it becomes the most crowded major nation in Europe, official forecasts suggest.
The current population of England is 50 million, but by 2056 the figure will be 68 million, meaning an average of 1,349 people will live in every square mile. At the moment England’s population density is 1,010 people per square mile....
The Conservatives, who obtained the figures in a parliamentary answer, said they were a damning indictment of Labour’s immigration policy and once again called for tariffs on migration....
About 1.3 million immigrants have arrived in the past decade and ministers say the record levels are required because the British economy has 600,000 job vacancies. Yet the benefits to indigenous Britons have been questioned.

Today, the government announced the second stage of a new points-based immigration system. (I briefly discussed the issue, as it relates to the all-important forecasted curry shortage, here.) British employers will have to prove they can't find a skilled countryman to fill an open post, and potential immigrants have to speak English and earn over 24,000 pounds (or about $47,400). The first stage of the points system went into place in February, applying to immigrants already in England who wanted to extend their stay. A third stage will go into effect later this year, covering temporary workers and students.

Just how crowded is England? As the Telegraph notes, the most crowded place in the world, Macau, has a population density of over 47,000 people to a square mile. California's density is about 217 people per square mile, while the U.S. has a density of under 100. But Los Angeles County's is 2,344, which is lower than Orange County's 3,605.

In any case, the UK is working hard to keep out at least one temporary visitor.

(And, I can't resist linking this.)

Comments

Actually, your figure of 2,344 per square mile in LA is misleading. Your figure is "raw density." Much of LA County is actually not open to residents. After eliminating federal and state lands, you reduce the amount of livable space in LA County in which to set up residence by at least a third. This, and assuming that half our population would be happy and able to live in desert areas of the county, leaves us with actual population density of 3,705 per square mile or 5.8 persons per acre. Is this good or bad? In order to maintain healthy energy consumption and environmental impact, scientists suggest the ideal to be about 0.02 persons per acre. Already, LA County density is 290 times that. You don’t even need to a scientist to tell you that LA County is too crowded as you sit in traffic day after day.

LA isn't too crowded. But unlike virtually every other major city world-wide, it lacks an adequate public transportation system. Trying to force LA to be more like a 'small city' isn't the solution.

Dear Swati Pandey,

Hello my name is Yesh Naidu and I am talking to you about a plan to fix this problem. But before we fix the situation we must understand how big a role density is in this issue. Density of a body is the ratio of its mass (m) to its volume (V), a measure of how tightly the matter within it is packed together. Their are many different types of density and for this situation the type we must use is people per square mile. Currently in England there are 1,010 people per square mile. One thing that you can do is by modifying school curriculum to include information on population expansion and implications for the future. This will help the students learn about the risks of overpopulation and if for every person that is aware, you are that much closer to reaching your goal. That is what I have to say about this article and thank you for your time.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





ADVERTISEMENT


All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Bit Player
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deals
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog
Los Angeles Times - Opinion