Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Marathon Man -- Running Off at the Mouth

March 3, 2008 |  8:04 pm

What year is this again? What city?

The Los Angeles Marathon gimmicked Sunday’s race to get a more thrilling finish. The 20-minute head start for women runners gave the victory and a six-figure bonus to the winner, the Russian woman who broke the tape.

Tatiana Aryasova’s overall time was two hours, 29 minutes and 9 seconds, compared to Laban Moiben of Kenya’s two hours, 13 minutes and 50 seconds.

The Marathon’s co-founder and president, William Burke, was so wowed by Aryasova's performance that he marveled to Channel 4, "You can't keep those women down. You can’t get them back in the kitchen."

So –- to answer my questions, the year must be 1950, and the town must be Stepford.

My colleague Helene Elliott reported that Burke offered "no smile or wink to indicate he was attempting to make a joke. Not even a forced chuckle."

His knuckle-headed remark is all the more distasteful because his wife is the formidable Yvonne Brathwaite Burke, the first woman and the first African-American on the Los Angeles County board of supervisors -– and the first African-American woman to go to Congress from California.

I hope she gave him a piece of her mind when he came home after Sunday’s marathon – because he sure sounded like he had come up a few brain cells short.

Burke didn't corner the market on boneheaded blather. Two TV commentators evidently spent some time discussing whether Aryasova's hormone levels were back to normal after childbirth. Her child was born more than two years ago. And someone left a voice mail message on Elliott’s phone suggesting she go back to the kitchen, and that "biology is destiny."

Absolutely right -- obviously you just can’t defeat those "dopey" genes.

Can you imagine the hue and cry if Burke had made some equivalently dumb, stereotypical remark about the first black marathoner to turn in a winning performance?

Oh, what’s that? You don't think he would have said any such thing?

Well, there’s the problem, right there.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

I think 10' or 2 Miles it's enough.. just wait for the 1st woman pass the Mil 2 and start the whole Marathon

2.

I (and many others) consider the male winner the overall winner of this marathon. He was robbed of the top money. When will the marathon end this business of giving women a headstart ? This is actually reinforcing gender bias. Let everyone who is able-bodied start at the same time.

3.

We needn't look back as far as 1950. Let us not forget that in the early 1970s, women were not allowed to register as "official" participants in marathons. The justification? Running was considered "dangerous" to women and their reproductive systems. Gimme a break! Did Arasova "win" the LA Marathon? As a runner, I have to say no. S/he with the fastest time wins. But anyone who can watch the YouTube post of Tatiana at mile 21 running 5:21 without marveling at her athleticism, beauty and grace is dead. That girl done us proud! Hooray Tatiana! There's more important things than "winning!" It's the beauty of the long distance runner.

4.

I sincerely doubt that the comment Mr. Burke was making was in anyway meant to be derogitory toward women. I don't understand why the comment must be justified by a "wink and a smile" as Ms. Morrison feels it should. If you just to take the comment matter-of-factly, it reads, "look how far we've come as a society." 1950? I don't think so, Patt. If it were 1950, those women probably wouldn't have been urged to race or been given the faculties to improve their performance to achieve what they did on Sunday. Rather than focus on the subtext of an off-handed comment, let us focus on the achievement and success in all women that was represented by Ms. Aryasova's accomplishment on Sunday.

5.

His comment may or may not be dumb. What is dumb is to say that someone who ran 2 hrs 29 min BEAT the person who ran two hrs 13 min. I hear you can hop a subway and come in a winner. Hormones, skin color and almost any other defining characteristic aside shouldn't the winner of the marathon be the winner with the best time? That way everyone is treated equally.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts

Archives