Fallon: the Barnett angle
On a reread, I think I may have made the case that Thomas P.M. Barnett is an insufferable windbag a bit too strongly a few years ago. Nevertheless, Thomas P.M. Barnett is an insufferable windbag, and it's disconcerting to see the global-strategy seer so centrally located in the downfall of Adm. William Fallon.
Barnett is not addressing the news at his site yet — though he is recounting his Fallon interview in a self-dramatizing play-by-play that features Chuck Norris-type factoids like the following:
I drove the 160 miles nonstop, changing my suit to travel clothes as I drove.
Barnett did address part of the controversy a few days ago, and in fairness, the idea that Barnett's Fallon profile in Esquire is what drove the Centcom commander to resign strains believability; there must be bigger disagreements at stake — which is the central point Barnett was making in his article. Here's how Barnett, in happier times, described Fallon in a breathless lead paragraph:
If, in the dying light of the Bush administration, we go to war with Iran, it'll all come down to one man. If we do not go to war with Iran, it'll come down to the same man. He is that rarest of creatures in the Bush universe: the good cop on Iran, and a man of strategic brilliance. His name is William Fallon, although all of his friends call him "Fox," which was his fighter-pilot call sign decades ago. Forty years into a military career that has seen this admiral rule over America's two most important combatant commands, Pacific Command and now United States Central Command, it's impossible to make this guy--as he likes to say--"nervous in the service."
Defense Secretary Robert Gates says Fallon's departure does not portend a change in Iran policy. Kevin Drum notes that Fallon's mellower course on Iran was clear back in September. Lawrence J. Korb sends along the following:
Admiral Fallon's abrupt retirement as the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East is the latest sign that the Pentagon's top brass do not agree with the direction in which the administration is heading in regard to the war in Iraq and the global war on terror.
Hopefully Fallon's resignation will force the administration to listen to his position on Iran and prevent them from ignoring the advice of their respected military advisors as they did with General Colin Powell and General Erik Shinseki when it came to waging the war in Iraq.



(IMHO) I’m guessing Tom Barnett’s days as a “Grand Strategist” are over. You are only a strategist if you have access to the pieces on the board. I doubt any Senior Government or private sector leader will want to take a chance on becoming his next victim. Barnett put his credentials as a “Grand Strategist” at risk when he knowingly “outed” what he called “The man between war and peace” for Esquire Magazine. A “Grand Strategist” would have recognized that he might be tipping the board over and starting a new, more dangerous game. A magazine hack would have published the story. I guess Barnett decided which he really is. The "National Esquirer" should be proud of his work.
I’ve met Dr. Barnett a few times and read his books. I don’t plan to buy his next one and deleted his blog link from my homepage. My cancellation to Esquire is “in the mail.”
Posted by: Al Alborn | March 12, 2008 at 06:11 AM
News today of Adm. Fallon's (forced) retirement is an ominous sign that the Bush-Cheney-neocon bunch will attack Iran.
Fallon is an honorable officer who stood up to these warmongers and war profiteers.
See the articles:
"Will Bush, Cheney Attack Iran? When and Why?"
Truthout.org
02 February 2007
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/020207A.shtml
-----
"Military Draft Needed for War With Iran and Syria?"
Truthout.org
20 September 2006
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/64/22754
Posted by: Hammo | March 11, 2008 at 08:27 PM
What is being overlooked - yet is in the article - is that Adm Fallon had an original and valuable strategic answer to our dealing with so many potential enemies at once. Between Bush/Cheney willingness to use military force as the FIRST resort, and Obama's 'lets make them all friends' mushy and unattainable strategy.
Fallon's conviction that one can 'deal' with them by prodiding or supporting their getting what they really need. Like his example of Iran's drug problem coming from Afghanistan poppy fields, which we could help reduce. i.e. 'Realpolitik' rather than either neocon theoreticl rejime change, or just talk.
Posted by: Dave Hughes | March 11, 2008 at 06:24 PM