Miss Hillary is toast.........she won't last to March 4th

When Obama becomes President, he will have to make a tremendous CHANGE. He will have to establish a new Cabinet Post. He must return to the Medivial Era and appoint his "Court Jester" to his cabinet. The person to be appointed must accept CHANGE and be ready for the first question: HRC.

@James Miller. Hey, everybody that Clinton pardoned had already faced a trial, or been sentenced and done their time. Even Mark Rich was pardoned if he returned and paid his civil fines. The uproar made it impossible for him to come home and accept the pardon. But hey, the press was outraged by this. On the other hand, Libby was looking at four years or so, and the question there was, will he give up Rove? The vice-president? The president? Bush, like his father, pardoned people in the middle of an active investigation that made it impossible to go after them as the criminals they are.
Bill's brother had done his time. Now he has his record expunged. The circus couple had done their time, and now can do business.
HW Bush pardoned the Iran-Contra conspirators while the special prosecutor was still in business and the target of the investigation was HW Bush. And he pardoned Armand Hammer, one of the sleaziest individuals to ever have a U.S. passport.

Hillary voiced her opposition to President Bush's pardoning of Mr. Libby, she failed to voice her opposition to her husband as he handed out 140 Presidential Pardons on their last days in the White House. Is this the first-hand experience she garnered while she was in the White House?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardons_controversy

This list of Pardons include individuals charged with cocaine possession, cocaine distribution, bank fraud, medicaid fraud, tax evasion, wire fraud, tax evasion, securities fraud, armed robbery, etc etc..

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm

According to Wikipedia, "In March 2000, Bill Clinton pardoned Edgar and Vonna Jo Gregory, owners of the carnival company United Shows International, for charges of bank fraud from a 1982 conviction (the couple were already out of jail, but the prior conviction prevented them from doing business transactions in certain states). First Lady Hillary Clinton's youngest brother, Tony Rodham, was an acquaintance of the Gregorys, and had lobbied Clinton on their behalf.[11] In October 2006, the group Judicial Watch filed a request with the U.S. Justice Department for an investigation, alleging that Rodham had received $107,000 from the Gregorys for the pardons, in the form of loans that were never repaid, as part of a quid pro quo scheme.[12]"

And what about the substantial donations to the Clinton Library and Hillary's senate Campaign by fugitive Mark Rich, who was pardoned by the Clintons...

Susan McDougal was pardoned for her role in the Whitewater scandal.

Roger Clinton, Bill's half-brother was pardoned on drug charges.

Does the Pardon process work or is it shamefully abused? What are Obama's thoughts on this topic?

Best regards,
James Miller

Regardless of Hillary's experience and ability, it's time the country moved past the Clinton-Bush era. A McCain-Obama election would present us with an entirely new choice. We could finally turn the page on a dark period of American politics.

Calvin Coolidge had good reason to wear an Indian head dress--he was part Indian, a fact which he mentioned in his autobiography and of which he was proud. (As far as I know, he was the first president to state publicly his Native American heritage.) Indians were also grateful to Cal for on June 2, 1924, he signed legislation making them U.S. citizens. He used his executive authority on occasion to wave for civil service requirement so that Native Americans could assume goverment positions. The Coolidge administration followed a policy stressing education and assimilation, which unfortunately was abondoned under the New Deal.

Hillary really pulls out all the stops when she accused the media of being tough on her. Poo hoo!!! Lets not forget the only reason she made it as far as she did is because she IS A WOMAN!!!!! If she were a man, would any of you white women so adamantly throw your support behind her??? No way, she was given a free pass to basically be coronated the Democratic presidential candidate, and had an Ex-president and the entire democratic machine behind her? What happened? Hillary happened. She is a total and utter fake, and the country sees it. The less exposure she gets the better, she is downright unlikeable, and ruthless. The more she talks, the worse it gets. Kind of funny, you can't make a pig into a racehorse.
And the whole experience bit. Does she really expect the world to believe that because she is a first lady, that it is the same as being president? And she has proven that she is unable to perform. The whole healthcare blunder, she blames the failure on the insurance lobby. Lets look at the facts, she had a democratic house and congress, and she was married the president!!!! The stars were all aligned!!!! How much more can you ask for? And she failed, because she can't get along with anyone, would be useless as a president. You can't make a pig into a racehorse, and she is proof.

Democrats need to start realizing that there is much at stake here, and crazy Clinton has a much poorer chance of winning a general election against Obama than does McCain. In that contest, I'd vote Nader. Dems in the coming contests need to favor electability in their decisions.

An independent woman (and independent thinker) who re-registered as a Democrat to vote for Obama, I will not vote for Clinton, even if she wins the nomination with the help of connected, establishment Dems in the guise of super-duper-delegates.

There are many of me out there. Clinton is not a woman of integrity. She is a narcissistic, power-mongering, obnoxious egomaniac. If she's elected, every decision will be based on whether it will get her reelected.

I want to see a woman president in my lifetime, but, please, not this woman. What an embarrassment to women. I would like to see Obama get a little tougher with her, and call it like it is, instead of being quite so gracious. But I guess his graciousness is why he'll be able to build a coalition to get things done, which she will not.

Hillary is simply useless:

-she fails to accounts campaign funds entrusted by supporters.

-she readily throws blame at helpless subordinates for any losses.

-she failed as a First Lady when endowed with worldly resourses at White House to inspire Bill who had to turn to Monica.

-she readily steals credits at whatever cost to benefit herself. She stole the limelight at Texas debate by displaying crocodile tears for American victims devastated by roadside bombs abd snipers in Iraq war, which is of her own doing by giving vote to Bush going to war in Iraq.

-she is an oppurtunist of the highest order who readily changes position at whatever cost to benefit herself. Currently she is campaigning to rewrite NAFTA signed by Bill and denying that she had earlier supported NAFTA which has resulted thosands of jobs moving offshores from Texas and Ohio.

Hillary is lost. We do not want an erratic person as President. The way she engage people (destroying others that don't listen her non sense), is distrative and not healthy for the Country.
I am Republican...but I will vote for Obama.
Yes we can!

For cryin' out loud! Stop beating up on the little white girl!
Since when America allowed that kind of behavior toward our female citizens to go on without cryin' out loud for it to stop. So Stop! Stop criticizing Hillary. Yes, she beautifully spoke at the Black State of the Union Forum and where was Obama? He showed all yall Black folks something didn't he after he got your votes.
He told yall to kiss his ass and went on about his business and offered to send his black wife who could better blend in that "ghetto atmosphere." Too bad Michele isn't the one running for President instead of her husband. She and Hillary have guts.

she has anti charisma... a bad air about her...

Hillary's deepest resentment comes from her sense of entitlement and privelage going all the way back to her privileged origins on Chicago's North Shore. And her position is being challenged by whom? Someone who has lived and worked ,not on behalf of himself, but of others less fortunate from the wrong side of Chicago. Her reactions show all the bristling reaction of someone faced with the temerity of a Barack Obama to whom she is really saying: Keep in your place. The South Carolina primary wasn't just a watershed: it was a revelation and unmaksing of Hillary's real sentiments. Why doesn't she just come out and call Obama "boy".