Back When ''In Bed With Lobbyists'' Was a Metaphor
It’s odd how one politician’s scandal tends to bulletproof the next politician who runs into the same kind of controversy.
Dan Quayle’s family connections got him a safe spot in the Indiana National Guard -- and, in 1988, a lot of press scrutiny. That probably cushioned the fall a bit for Bill Clinton when it came out that he got an ROTC student deferment and then bailed out on training when he got a high lottery number. And that in turn probably helped to mute public reaction to the news of George Bush using connections for a stateside National Guard billet, and his no-shows even there.
Bill Clinton with an un-inhaled spliff may make things easier for Barack Obama, who got out in front on his own drug use. Ronald Reagan was divorced, and John McCain’s divorce and Bob Dole’s before him haven’t even been an issue. [It was Giuliani’s two splits, and the manner of them, that tripped him up.]
And now there’s the New York Times story about John McCain and a woman lobbyist.
There’s some precedent there, too -– but this time the politician didn’t contradict the newspaper report: Bill Thomas, a Bakersfield Republican and Congressional veteran who ran in 2000 the House Ways and Means health subcommittee.
That year, as Thomas pushed and prodded and ramrodded to get a prescription drug bill through Congress, his hometown paper, the Bakersfield Californian, quoted unnamed sources to report that Thomas had a close personal relationship with a woman who lobbied for major drug and health care firms -– and that those sources had told the newspaper that Thomas’ chief of staff had said so to several people.
Thomas’ response, unlike McCain's, was not a denial: ``Any personal failures of commitment or responsibility to my wife, family or friends are just that -– personal.’’ His public duties meant he had sacrificed ‘’perhaps too often to be as good a husband or father as I should or could have been.’’ Thomas stayed on in Congress another six years, wrapping up as the Big Cheese of Ways and Means.
But curiously, it wasn’t Thomas who cushioned the blow for McCain –- it was Clinton, again. Monica-gate, and the Republicans’ shabby shot at impeachment over it, have generally raised the bar when it comes to the power of sexual misconduct accusations. The public shrug to the New York Times story seems to show that the sexual innuendo part of the story, and public distaste for it, somehow made the lobbyist part of the story inconsequential.
Jesse Unruh, the fabled California Assembly speakers, said of lobbyists and fat cats –- and I tidy up his language here -- ``If you can’t drink their whiskey, take their money, sleep with their women and still vote against them in the morning, you don’t belong in politics.’’ Unruh did not anticipate a time when the ‘’they’’ would be the women.


Back When ''In Bed With Lobbyists'' Was a Metaphor
That was when holy man was not there Now you have them and you do not listen.
Sir
This is a limit to the mockery of the Holy man. Is it not?
It times of Jesus there were no stations with the ink pads to take your thumb prints, no papers to show you the zebras stood for the democrats and the lion stood for the aristocrats, the crocodile stood for democracy and the umbrellas stood for the green party. We did not have these and we did not care about these as we had love and hatred, just two parties. The holy men or call them prophets came to show us the or guide us to the right paths. Alas e just could not get the right bearings and never heard them. So the creator sent more and more and more of us became gays, lesbians, worship snails, trees, stars, the moon and the mountain. Sir. We failed then, we fail now. We do not need the electoral committee to watch us through the bombs and the terrorist and the economy as we had love then. WE miss this now. We martyred many in the name of calling these prophets maharajah form the unknowns, insane, magicians, and poets. We did away with all the good sermons they bought to us by rewriting the books the way we wanted to read. We created the Bible and pictures of Jesus and cartoon of Mohamed. We are insane. I, you, all who read.
Why bring them back to this disgraced world when they came and set the courses for us we failed to follow?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla MBA PhD
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa
Posted by: Firozali A. Mulla MBA PhD | February 23, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Unruh probably even believed that when he said it.
Posted by: Tom | February 24, 2008 at 08:12 AM
Even if "in bed with lobbyists" is only metaphorical for McCain, it still is a problem. Those who have attacked the New York Times have missed the point. It is a fantasy to suppose that McCain can have lobbyists for friends, take favors and campaign contributions from them, have them run his campaign and not be influenced in his behavior by them. If McCain hasn't figured this out, he is too delusional to be president.
Posted by: Richard Friedman | February 24, 2008 at 08:18 AM
McCain is a big, fat hypocrite and a liar. It's obvious that he was involved personally with that young lobbyist and gave her a leg up career wise by helping one of her clients. When he issued that blanket denial, I'm surprised his nose didn't grow. So, what he's saying is that everybody is lying from his aides to the client. Oh well, McCain can also chalk it up to his age. After all he's old as dirt.
Posted by: marian | February 24, 2008 at 11:08 AM
What blow for McCain? Has someone come forward with some proof to back up NYT's hitpiece on McCain?
Posted by: Keith | February 24, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Right on, Keith. The integrity of Senator John McAbramoff is unimpeachable.
Posted by: Leslie Webb | February 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM