Reason report cites Ron's racist Cyrano
The half-life of Ron Paul's racist newsletters, a story that has gained almost as little traction as the Paul campaign itself, gets a new wrinkle as Reason's Julian Sanchez and Dave Weigel name the infamous Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. as the pigment- and wrist-strength-obsessed ghostwriter. That was my guess when the identity of Mr. or Madame X became an issue, and the authors have got a host of fellow travelers stating that it was indeed Liberty Lew.
As with so many things that Everybody knows, there's always the possibility that this one is not true. Rockwell himself has denied the charge in other media and refused to comment to Sanchez and Weigel. One commenter says Reason is exaggerating Rockwell's role in order to spare Paul himself.
That doesn't seem to be supported by the article, and S&W surely understand that the negligence defense does nothing to get Paul off the hook. To use the reductio ad absurdum libertarians are said to enjoy, suppose Paul actually became president: Presidential administrations are constantly acting on issues bound up in race. Would any person be willing to give the benefit of the doubt when a Paul appointee to the Justice Department or the Federal Election Commission makes even a valid argument against some race-based policy or dismisses claims about disenfranchising black voters? (That is, in the unlikely event a Paul Administration had an FEC at all.) Nevertheless, the piece allows the inference that the man who would save "the blacks" from unfair drug laws is guilty mainly of sins of omission:
The tenor of Paul's newsletters changed over the years. The ones published between Paul's return to private life after three full terms in congress (1985) and his Libertarian presidential bid (1988) notably lack inflammatory racial or anti-gay comments. The letters published between Paul's first run for president and his return to Congress in 1996 are another story—replete with claims that Martin Luther King "seduced underage girls and boys," that black protesters should gather "at a food stamp bureau or a crack house" rather than the Statue of Liberty, and that AIDS sufferers "enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick."
With more interesting ancient history about the Rothbard-Rockwell alliance and their libertarian version of the Southern Strategy. As with most libertarian movement history, the back story is an Illiad of breaks-with, fallings-out, mutual excommunications and hurt feelings, but the specific case is pretty straightforward. Whole article.
Related: Rockwell always feels like somebody's watching him and he's got no privacy.


zzzzz. Oh God.
'Negligence' implies someone has committed a tort. This was not negligence. Ron Paul let some other libertarians use his name on a newsletter. They abused that privilege. They owe him an apology, but he owes us nothing. Get over it.
Posted by: Grizzle | February 06, 2008 at 10:58 AM
From article:
"The half-life of Ron Paul's racist newsletters..."
Remember, when the politically correct use the term racist, they simply mean white Gentiles who discriminate.
It is a racial slur given selectively to white Gentiles. Racist = honky.
So, the translation of the quote would be: "The half-life of Ron Paul's honky newsletters"
Posted by: JoeMorgan | February 06, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Meanwhile, the last chance our country has to fix it's real problems (foreign policy, moentary policy, loss of civil liberties, and fiscal policy to name just a few) is slipping down the drain. Partly because of a media that has more power than all the other special intersts combined and exercises that power to its own interest. It's not illegal and shouldn't be but it really really sucks and most Americans are too tied up in Superbowls, V8 engines, houses, Brittany Spears and whatever else to even understand.
And this is news?
Posted by: Colin | February 06, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Wow breaking news. I'm sure this, along with your entire career's accomplishments are going to be carved in stone when America finally wins the two (so far) endless wars its fighting. Maybe that will be the same time your currency finally starts pulling away from the Thai Baht - and Americans aren't looked upon anymore as the most ignorant people on earth. Then again this is all a game to you and its really funny ... but not for long.
America is so pathetic. The world can smell your rot - and rags like the LA Times are like swarms of flies leading one to the carcass. A high school student with an Internet connection could (and probably does) write more compelling and meaningful news than you . But its not really your fault, its the boss that hired such inept talent that's to blame.
Keep up the good work ... You keep that glossy American finish as shiny as ever.
Posted by: Brian | February 06, 2008 at 12:00 PM
I'm with the other guy, asleep on this story. It's border line lame at this point. He's not a racist but a hero for the Constitution. Why do you people hate the light. He is exposing the out of control bureaucracy in government and all you want to do is ridicule the man. It's the lowest form of argument. The bottom line is he said he doesn't share the beliefs of the writings... The real story is how he's being tossed aside for candidates that have inferior ideas... wwwdotknowbeforeyouvotedotcom
Posted by: paul kerby | February 06, 2008 at 12:41 PM
If this story was taken to the point it should express more important thoughts:
the irony of the "honky-racist" story is that it started a defamation campaign against a man who argues in favor of "defamation rights" in order to save the freedom of speech !
The irony is also that libertarian philosophy is the democratic ideal expressed in terms of respect for the unique individual, and here we have a political critique addressed at somebody pretending to be another (Ron Paul) as it seems.
Posted by: Artisan | February 06, 2008 at 01:27 PM
What is it with you guys and his news letters why dont you boys check out McCain and spead your lies about him. I am so unhappy with how Ron has been screwed over by the MSM. He is so not a Racist.
Posted by: Gary A | February 06, 2008 at 01:45 PM
why is it that i have heard that mccain has refered to a certain ethnicity as gooks and nothing is being made of it in the press. all one has to do is look at RON PAUL'S platform and read up on what he represents to know the integrity of this man. he is the best person running and the only one who deserves AMERICA'S trust. just because the establishment doesn't want what is best for the country doesn't mean that the rest of us agree with them. when the masses are ignorant we all suffer and the mainstream media is doing all it can to keep AMERICA ignorant.
Posted by: sherrie | February 06, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Is that it? Is that all you've got on Ron Paul? That he knows someone who - using his freedom of speech - wrote some things that 16 years later seem to be non-politically correct?
NOBODY, including the author of the smear, even claims that Ron Paul has EVER said anything like that. Despite being in Congress for 20 years, there is not one incident of him saying such. Surely there would be a video, or audio recording? The President of the Austin chapter of the NAACP, whom has known Dr Paul for 20 years, says that there's not a racist bone in his body, and that this is just a political beat-up. End of story.
The worst that Ron Paul is guilty of is that he won't throw a friend whom exercised his freedom of speech under the bus for the sake of political expediency. I actually WANT a President who would take such a position!
Meanwhile, you have Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Mike Huckabee featuring on Judicial Watch's Top Ten Most Corrupt Politicians for 2007 list!! (Guiliani is there, too). And McCain? Google "Keating Five"
And Romney's so damn plastic, he'll take any position that will allow him to buy the Presidency for the sake of his own ego. Can you imagine someone so plastic resisting the NWO forces channelled through the CFR? Not likely!
Ron Paul is the one that will save this country.
Posted by: lastnymleft | February 06, 2008 at 03:22 PM
Thank you!
This is just the kind of trash reporting that'll spark the Paul campaign and his supporters. I couldn't of asked for a more pathetic attempt -- and at a more apt time -- to undermine Paul and rouse his base.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Posted by: Jeffrey Bubb | February 06, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Whoever wrote this drivel needs to learn about investigative journalism. Ron Paul has never been nor is a racist. His old newsletters written by guest writers were not racist, but where politically edgy commentaries taken completely out of context by "The New Republic". Read the newsletters in full for yourself. They are written in a Howard Stern/Ann Coulter style. John McCain and Hillary Clinton have said things far more racist on record. Ron Paul is not even close. This is a tempest in a teapot. Please grow up.
Posted by: Abe | February 06, 2008 at 04:36 PM
If there really is a definition of what a "real libertarian" is, maybe it's someone who doesn't believe that politicians are the answer to our problems.
...even if that politician is Ron Paul.
Posted by: Ken Shultz | February 06, 2008 at 06:17 PM
Oh boy, here come the aPaulogists, no doubt brought in by some forum to flood the comments with drivel about defending the Constitution. Heaven forbid they actually *read the article*. Nobody is claiming to know who wrote the racist articles. The fact that this objectively racist filth appeared in Paul's own newsletter so frequently for so long should give any reasonable person some pause, regardless of who the actual author was. But hey, don't let me shut you up, I actually somewhat enjoy these excuses and backpedaling. I especially like lastnymleft's implication that such dreck could have been acceptable when it was written.
If Dr. Paul can't even keep tabs on what's being written under his own name, how do you expect him to lead a nation?
Posted by: Trevor | February 06, 2008 at 06:48 PM
keep kicking the dead horse. is this called "news". gimme a break.
Posted by: cpdiem | February 06, 2008 at 11:01 PM
From what little I've read in context, all of the racist comments are blown completely out of proportion. If you take a sentence out of the context of its paragraph or page you can take something that was meant to be shocking to create thought or illustrative of the views of someone else and turn it into something it was never meant to be. This was certainly true of the 2nd Kirchick hit piece, considering some of the things that he was referring to (but didn't go so far as to quote that time) were actually attributable to Abraham Lincoln, and were not even written in "the" newsletters but in another periodical that was advertised within the newsletters.
How do you smear someone with nearly impeccable credentials? You put him on pedestal that all the other candidates are spared from, and you twist the words of things that were in some way associated with, but not a product of the person in question. And this is precisely what has been done.
Posted by: Chad_Underdonk | February 07, 2008 at 06:54 AM
"Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran"
I wonder why foolishness like McCain's ill conceived "bomb Iran" comment and his reference to "gooks" aren't publicized. Ron Paul was nailed to the wall without even making racist statements that were attributed to him falsely. McCain is actually on tape making warmonger and racist remarks, but he gets a pass.
Thanks main stream media, you're really screwing the citizens. Free press, and this is what you do with it.
Posted by: James O | February 07, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Please mention McCain's use of the word 'Gooks' and his refusal to apologize for it, not Ron Paul's racism which he didn't write.
Thanks
Posted by: Matthew | February 07, 2008 at 09:17 AM
We will get a Business As Usual president this year because we choose to submit all lower-profile candidates (ones that the major opinion polls show to be statistically insignificant) to much, much, MUCH higher levels of scrutiny than the mainstream candidates. We will pay dearly for our stupidity.
Posted by: Darryl Schmitz | February 25, 2008 at 08:40 AM
Go Ron Paul!
Posted by: John-Ross Swanstone Cromer | March 07, 2008 at 06:34 AM