In today's pages: Dead celebrities and dying art collections
The editorial board praises state legislators on their approach to healthcare, pollution, and the rights of celebrities:
Dying isn't so good for one's work ethic, but it doesn't stop the work from continuing to earn money. Copyrights last for 70 years after the death of the author, composer or artist. Patent royalties can be collected for up to 20 years, with or without the inventor's presence on Earth. And in California, individuals control the rights to their names, likenesses and voices for 70 years beyond their interment.
Courts originally recognized the latter, known as the right of publicity, as an extension of the right to privacy. The name and image of a celebrity had value, and that person deserved the chance to capitalize on it exclusively. That approach made sense, as long as the rights didn't trump free speech.
Columnist Jonah Goldberg notices that despite all the second anniversary Katrina remembrances in the media, no one mentioned all the media mess-ups during the disaster. CultureGrrl blogger Lee Rosenbaum explains why public art collections are dwindling. And Times blogger Peter Viles demonstrates how real estate bloggers and the anti-bailout opinions they express are ignored by politicians.
Readers react to the Los Angeles school board's decision to siphon kids' lunch funds to pay for healthcare for part-time cafeteria workers. School Board member Tamar Galatzan isn't a fan of the idea: "While it's a national tragedy that millions of Americans do not have health insurance, this is no way to address the problem."



California law already provides these rights for celebrities.
Senate Bill 771 benefits only one (1) company - Marilyn Monroe Estate, MMLLC, by back-dating the law to 7 decades.
MMLLC and CMG have made tens of millions off Marilyn - the court ruled that they improperly made these millions.
This law avoids the liability for asserting non-existent rights. It isn't about "protecting celebrities" at all.
Posted by: CA. agent | September 04, 2007 at 10:46 AM
The Estate of Marilyn Monroe, MMLLC (Anna Strasberg) are taking one more shot to try to reclaim what was never theirs to begin with. That is the Right of Publicity for Marilyn Monroe.
The proposed bill is flawed in numerous respects. Most notably, it would immediately make unlawful uses of a person's "portrait, name, voice, signature or picture" that are currently legal.
They attempted this in New York last month with an "identity theft" amendment - which the NY legislature was able to easily see through...
Posted by: N,Fitzpatrick | September 04, 2007 at 10:16 AM