Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

"I don't mean to be rude, but..."

Watching C-SPAN last night was painful, and I don’t mean because it bored me to death. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s testimony at yesterday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing provided the same entertainment value as the first round of American Idol, in which a self-deluded contestant puts in a lousy performance, the judges delightedly make an even bigger fool of him and the in-studio audience guffaws at every single gaffe.

The whole excruciating charade would have been easier to take had Gonzales shown remorse, anger or some other human emotion. But for most of the four hours he just floundered along impassively, rendering many committee members’ hard-hitting questions about as effective as punching a jellyfish that keeps stinging itself.

Take the infamous scene where Gonzales insisted he made a misstatement but clarified it with the reporter two days afterward. Minutes later, he admits a spokesperson made the clarification and Gonzales didn’t even know what was said.

I’d like to believe there’s a reason for all this well documented obfuscation. Heck, I’d even take some cunning, devious master plan on the part of the administration over the ineptitude demonstrated last night.

But frankly, I'd wager that if the Attorney General were asked, "Alberto, how could you have thought going for this was a good idea?" the best we'd get is, "I would say that that's a good question." 

 

Comments () | Archives (2)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Ken Shultz

"I’d like to believe there’s a reason for all this well documented obfuscation. Heck, I’d even take some cunning, devious master plan on the part of the administration over the ineptitude demonstrated last night."

It reminds me of my own assumptions about Saddam Hussein and his refusal to cooperate with weapons inspectors. I was one of those who assumed that he wouldn't risk being invaded and deposed like that unless he was guilty as sin.

Big mistake! Sociopath megalomaniacs don't think like the rest of us--who knew?

"But frankly, I'd wager that if the Attorney General were asked, "Alberto, how could you have thought going for this was a good idea?" the best we'd get is, "I would say that that's a good question."

...and in line with the old dictum about simple explanations and probabilities, the simplest explanation for Gonzales' actions is incompetence, isn't it?

I agree. ...if only there really had been a master plan! That's something I understand.

bkmur

Gonzales and the Henchmen keep on obfuscating like that, they'll go blind.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video


Categories


Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »

Archives
 


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.



In Case You Missed It...