Opinion L.A.

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

Scandal Roundup

Andrés Martinez in L.A. Observed:

The disgruntled news staff is cheering [Jim O'Shea] on as he leads the charge to storm the editorial page and bring it back into lockstep with newsroom, but pretty soon they will remember why those pictures of Dean are still up on their walls and what Jim's mission here really is. With any luck for him, the second floor witch hunt can prove so time-consuming he can get a delay on those firings. 

Read all of the above post, then Jim O'Shea's response to the troops:

I also want to correct some misinformation being published on blogs by Andres Martinez. I don't want to engage in mud-slinging with Andres. He is a good journalist and I feel bad for him, worse today, in fact, than yesterday. But I'm also not going to sit here like some silent lamb while he distorts my record and attacks this newspaper and my newsroom.
   
I am not in charge of the editorial board of this newspaper. The editor of the editorial page reports directly and independently to Publisher David Hiller. That is as it should be. I strongly believe in the principle that separate editors should be in charge of news and opinion. To suggest that I told David Hiller I didn't want the editorial board reporting to me on a "whim" is untrue. He is referring to part of a longer conversation with Nikki Finke, and to take my remarks out of context is unprofessional and sloppy. Moreover, no one in this newsroom is on a campaign to "storm the editorial page and bring it back into lockstep with the newsroom." It is true that we have journalists in the newsroom who don't agree with Andres' views on the ethical problems that led to his resignation. I count myself among them. But these are legitimate, genuine differences of opinion held by people with a passion for the news and this newspaper. To suggest otherwise is pitiful. He also attacked Sue Horton and Julie Marquis for having the audacity to alert the editorial pages to the important work of the staff in case it might make a good editorial. Sun and Julie did nothing wrong.
   
Lastly, Andres suggests I came to Los Angeles as some sort of agent of Tribune Company to quell an "uprising by the imperial subjects." To refer to the journalists at this newspaper in such a manner in an insult to hard-working people who happen to disagree with Andres. I came here because it was an honor to be selected to lead a great newspaper with an excellent staff in one of the most interesting cities in the world. I will stand on my record and credentials as a newsman and journalist. The suggestion that I make decisions simply to curry favor with the staff is also simply untrue. We face hard times.  If I have to make decisions that are unpopular with the staff but in the best long-term interest of this newspaper, I will not hesitate to do make them. That is what leadership is about.  I've said that openly from the day that I walked into this newsroom.
   
I believe in full disclosure.

Other stuff:

Kevin Drum dismisses Grazergate here and here.

Mickey Kaus agrees that the whole unfortunate business is a big nothing.

At Radar, John Cook takes a look into the glass house of Martinez' accusers.

The indispensable Patterico sniffs out a left-wing coup here, here and here.

Coverage from the Times of New York and Los Angeles.

And Nikki Finke puts a tremulous finger on the real infection: "Sanctimonious newsroom reporters and editors acting all holier-than-thou about journalism ethics, even though they never complained about the impropriety of their ousted editor Dean Baquet's behind-the-scenes cozying up to a Billionaire Boys Club of potential local buyers for the LA Times. An editorial editor who oversaw the opinion/Op-ed pages spiralling into irrelevancy, in part because Spring Street's 2nd floor now panders to neo-con and libertarian and other fringe ideologues whose main qualifications for being published there seem be that they're all palsy-walsy with each other." (There's plenty more of this one, but long ago I vowed before God to stop reading any text once I come to the phrase "palsy-walsy.")

At today's very moving funeral for Cathy Seipp, Allan Mayer started off his eulogy by noting his brouhaha with the Times and regretting that longtime Times-watcher Seipp "isn't around to enjoy the festivities."

 

Comments () | Archives (5)

The comments to this entry are closed.

bg mendell

I thought I was reading a Johnny Cochran summation.

Ken Shultz

"An editorial editor who oversaw the opinion/Op-ed pages spiralling into irrelevancy, in part because Spring Street's 2nd floor now panders to neo-con and libertarian and other fringe ideologues whose main qualifications for being published there seem be that they're all palsy-walsy with each other."

I think this may hit on something. I don't know anything about the intricacies of running a newspaper. I'm just a casual outside observer.

...but from the outside lookin' in, if there's one thing that's wrong with the LA Times that's plain for all to see, it's all the palsy-walsyness.

Jim Treacher

If the Finke loses her s***, you must omit!

Harry Lime

I was at the Seipp funeral. I thought Mayer's eulogy was one of the least appropriate ones I've come across -- he basically talked about himself for the first five minutes and his problems with the Times, and then brought Cathy in only at the end. One of the all-time self-involved, self-indulgent, self-serving eulogies.

Matt Welch

Harry -- I have a really hard time believing any true friend of Cathy Seipp wouldn't have the guts to use his/her real name, especially when talking about journalism & the L.A. Times. I also think your characterization of Mayer's eulogy is ridiculous.


Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video


Categories


Recent Posts
Reading Supreme Court tea leaves on 'Obamacare' |  March 27, 2012, 5:47 pm »
Candidates go PG-13 on the press |  March 27, 2012, 5:45 am »
Santorum's faulty premise on healthcare reform |  March 26, 2012, 5:20 pm »

Archives
 


About the Bloggers
The Opinion L.A. blog is the work of Los Angeles Times Editorial Board membersNicholas Goldberg, Robert Greene, Carla Hall, Jon Healey, Sandra Hernandez, Karin Klein, Michael McGough, Jim Newton and Dan Turner. Columnists Patt Morrison and Doyle McManus also write for the blog, as do Letters editor Paul Thornton, copy chief Paul Whitefield and senior web producer Alexandra Le Tellier.



In Case You Missed It...