Now that we have your attention...
Our former editor's Daffy Duck routine has brought with it one benefit: We've been getting some better-than-usual traffic on this blog. So while we still have some eyeballs on us, I'd like to let all-y'all know about the many fabtrabulous new features we've been introducing at Opinion L.A. We have rolled out a variety of new online-only features, which we hope will begin to bridge the gap between "print" stuff and "online" stuff as the newsprint medium continues to wither and these here internets allow for even more and better news coverage.
You can start with our few-months-old Opinion Daily, a column that comes out each weekday, written by alternating members of the editorial board. Recent dailies of interest include Michael McGough's disambiguation of the political bedfellows in the Bong Hits For Jesus case; Andrés Martinez' moving tribute to Hal Rothman; Robert Greene's fascinating study of the future of direct democracy in the cellphone-voting age; and Sonni Efron's defense of economic sanctions.
Straight outta 1995, we've also brought online chat roaring back to life. Dig our recent chats with columnist Rosa Brooks and assistant editor Matt Welch, as well as the SRO blowout with columnist Jonah Goldberg. Look for more of the Opinion L.A. Chat in the weeks to come.
Dust-up is our almost-newest feature, a weeklong debate between experts, wonks, politicians, blowhards and other luminaries, on topics in the news and/or in our region. This week's dust-up focused on best ways to solve L.A.'s traffic crisis. In recent weeks, we've had debaters go at it on performance-enhancing drugs in sports; the Scooter Libby trial; and Gov. Schwarzenegger's health care initiative.
That health-care debate, by the way, brought a spirited rejoinder from Pacific Research Institute's John R. Graham, which we were happy to run. This brings us to yet another exciting new feature: Blowback, an opportunity for concerned readers to publish oped-length rebuttals to features that have appeared in the Times. Recent responses have come from the Venezuelan ambassador, a senior State Department official, and others. (Sorry, I just realized as I'm typing this that we don't have a Blowback archive: Will get to that asap!)
In old-fashioned "push" media, we'll be rolling out a daily email newsletter, within the next week I hope, that will keep you informed of what new stuff we've got going on at Opinion L.A.—including old media stuff, new media stuff, and an exciting blend of the two. Signup instructions will show up in this blog and at the Opinion front page, but if you'd like to get in early, email us at opinionla@latimes.com, and we'll set you up.
And of course, we still have all the old print stalwarts: editorials (those unsigned thingees that run on the left page of the print version and speak—more or less—for the board as an institution); opeds (signed columns written by people from oustide the Times opinion section); letters from our readers; the Sunday Current section; and our murderers' row of regular columnists.
I'd like to thank Andrés Martinez for his steadfast and enthusiastic support in guiding our new features and innovations through a work environment where change is frequently less than welcome. If not for Andrés, you would be looking at a much smaller catalogue of new features. I wish him the best, and hope that we can continue his ambition of making maximum use of new media to produce a better and more exciting Los Angeles Times. *
* I made a change to this last graf to eliminate some accurate but stylistically extraneous material. For the original version, see L.A. Observed and Patterico.








Okay, that was boring. Way to toss a wet blanket on the growing readership. Why are people turning to new media? Because we have an alternative, suddenly, to boring. For a minute there, we thought you were catchng on.
Posted by: Pascal Zeissner | March 24, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Yeah, Tim. This should be the best blog in LA for at least the next week. Go to town with it, dust everyone you can with it. Don't be that guy who says, "Hi, everyone! Thanks for linking, Metafilter!"
Rutten's column today was unique for being both massively dull and massively disingenuous. But I gues you don't remain a hack at the Times for so long by minding your scruples.
"Funny, but it isn't the publisher who was dating a Hollywood publicist." What a faux-sanctimonious chump. What rot, to see all this spilling out. of your newspaper, and then you guys turning around and saying, "But we don't have enough space for...[x]!"
Still, we're here, munching popcorn. Next!
Posted by: joseph mailander | March 24, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Current would have been a lot more interesting if you ran both issues back to back this week, given the fervor down there regarding what you pulled from view.
As a long time subscriber/reader just to the north a bit, Current was one of the most interesting parts of my Sunday edition. I'll miss Mr. Martinez at the helm. Having a guest editor seemed a fresh, novel idea and would have brought even more hipness to the section. Today's fell flat. As in Ouchfest.
You could have had Current PLUS Guest Current, if you were worried about stance overall.
ps: Book Review used to have great poems running weekly. Stuffing Editorial inside there might not cut it up here in Santa Barbara. It's going to get lost in there. More Mimi Pond, please?
Posted by: Adrienne | March 25, 2007 at 12:47 PM
So what's the deal ? Eh? I am one of the only blogs coming out of skid row and I am not listed on the right of this page. Alas!!!! Blogdowntown isn't even listed.
But it is good to see the most leaning left blog in Los Angeles MArtini Republic is up. I have a bit of a handicap when it comes to being a liberal , so I always have to read martini republic to see where I need to be on my left leaning issues.
Posted by: Don Garza | March 26, 2007 at 03:30 AM
we are being allowed to participate?
wow!!!!
I love it.
I am buying a subscription next month!!!
Posted by: Don Garza | March 26, 2007 at 11:39 AM
Garza, we shall fix this grievous oversight.
Posted by: Matt Welch | March 26, 2007 at 01:37 PM
You go, Don!
Posted by: e@v | March 26, 2007 at 11:43 PM