Opinion L.A.

The best in Southern California opinion journalism,
Monday through Friday

« Previous Post | Opinion L.A. Home | Next Post »

A Titanic blow to Christian faith?

February 27, 2007 |  9:37 am

When I first heard (out of one ear cocked to the TV news) that “Titanic” director James Cameron had had produced a documentary about a purported “lost tomb of Jesus,” I visualized Leo DiCaprio standing on a mausoleum shouting, “I am the king of the Jews.” An Associated Press story about the documentary doesn’t incline me to take this ”bombshell” any more seriously, though I suppose I’ll watch the program.

At the center of this supposed “shock horror” story for Christians is the discovery in a Jerusalem suburb 27 years ago of ossuaries (bone boxes) labeled with the names of “Yeshua bar Yosef” (Jesus son of Joseph) and “Maria” (Mary). There is also an ossuary for “Yehuda bar Yeshua” (Judah, son of Jesus).) Apparently the documentary leaps, “Da Vinci Code” style, to the hypothesis that here we have a reference to the remains of a married Jesus, his wife  and his son. The Catholic League is suitably offended.

As a sometime religion writer, I am bracing myself for the same sort of theologically illiterate coverage that attended the “Da Vinci Code” sensation.

Two cautionary points:

1) Although you never would have known it from the nuns who taught me at Sacred Heart School in Pittsburgh, Yeshua (an Aramaic variation ofr Joshua) was a common name. Don’t take my word for it. In his classic study of Jesus, “A Marginal Jew,” the Catholic scripture scholar Father John Meier writes: “It is hard for Christians today to appreciate that Jesus of Nazareth did not stand out in his contemporaries’ minds because of his name.”

2) The notion that Jesus might have been married is not the conversation-stopper (or scandal to Christian faith) that it might seem. Meier concludes that “we cannot be absolutely sure whether or not Jesus was married,” but thinks the more probably hypothesis is that he was not and remained celibate for religious reasons.

As with “The Da Vinci Code,” it may be that public interest in Cameron’s documentary will steer viewers toward serious books about Jesus – or even a novel like “Gospel” by Wilton Barnhardt, an erudite and entertaining thriller that does double duty as a primer on the Bible, Christian doctrine and the history of heresy. James Cameron should consider adapting it as a film.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments
1.

Cameron's a Whore, and nobody is buying...........And good old Jonathen Eells can use his 3 Dollar words, but if you cover a Turd with sugar, it is still shit. God Bless.

2.

The inestimable value in Cameron's work is to keep a dialogue of rationality and critical introspection going, if not within, then at least epiphenomenal to the Christian community in the hopes that some daylight - some Enlightenment - will creep in at the edges.

3.

There are a lot of things we do not know.
Wait until the documentary.
Then they need to show us SOLID proof.
With no real proof of finding Jesus, I could say I found or saw him in my back yard.
I say read the Bible first!

George Vreeland Hill



Advertisement

About the Bloggers
Opinion L.A. is the work of the Los Angeles Times editorial board.



Recent Posts

Archives